This topic contains 4 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by
Ho Lee Fuk, MGTOW! 3 years, 5 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Gentlemen,
I found this very interesting. Enjoy!
From http://judgybitch.com/2016/08/16/reblog-research-find-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/
Have a look there for the most impressive diagrams I have ever seen for this topic.
Legions of feminists will ferociously type smash the patriarchy! at their Internet rallies, calling out for the end of the male supremacy in all spheres of life. Yet, few of them acknowledge the fact that one of these spheres, the government (the institution granting them rights), is entirely funded by male taxpayers. Economically, women cost more to the state than they benefit. The government is literally paying women to be alive. As such, strong independent women are only that way because the state is transferring money from men to them. Feminists are not seriously against being dependent on men, they are just against men having the full control over their money.
Let’s explore a fiscal research report in New Zealand.
THE REAL GENDER GAP: THE TAX GAP
While the 77¢ for a dollar wage gap has been under the spotlight for the past years, the 200¢ for a dollar tax gap has, to my knowledge never been mentioned, at least not by our supreme feminist leaders Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau. A quick glimpse at the data reveals a massive difference in taxes paid by men and women.
taxbycapitaThe first thing that comes to mind is that half of women might be at home raising kids. However, the workforce participation rate gap between men and women doesn’t seem to exceed 10% in either age group. (see figure 4 in source)
The second thing that may come to mind as a confounding factor is that women spend more for children in education and health. Nope. No support for that either. Men and women spend approximately the same amount in both education and health (see figure 10 and 11 of the source).
IN NEARLY ALL AGE GROUPS, WOMEN RECEIVE MORE TAX THAN THEY GIVE
With the exception of the age group between 45-59 (a 15 year span) years old, women cost more to the state than the tax they provide. In contrast, men generate more tax revenue than they cost between 23 and 65 (a 43 year span). In the brief period in which women generate more or as much tax money than they consume, men outscore them by at least 3 times. pergroup.jpg
BY THE END OF HER LIFE, THE AVERAGE WOMAN WILL HAVE A NEGATIVE FISCAL IMPACT OF $150,000
By large, the cumulative tax money given to women outweighs the tax money generated by women. The short period of positive impact of women between 45 and 59 is countered by 65 other years in which their allocated tax expenditure is more than what they supply the state. cumul.jpg
Men, on the other hand, appear to have a positive cumulative net fiscal impact from approximately 40 until 80 years of age. For these particular taxes and public expenditures, the net fiscal incidence on men is approximately zero when cumulated over all ages. (p. 22)
Overall, the research suggests that male taxpayers are the only ones to ever have a positive contribution in taxes. Based on Figure 17, the closest that the average woman will come to having a positive fiscal incidence is when she is at minus $50,000 around 55 years of age. While feminists are demonizing men for benefiting from all liberties and rights they have constructed, they have oddly remained silent over the fact that anonymous male tax payers are paying women to exist. Read that sentence again.
The fact that feminists want a stronger government is not a coincidence. While historically, women had to choose a wealthy husband for resources, they can now stay single, be lesbians, marry a poor man, or use the sperm bank, and the state will still transfer male taxes to them. Interestingly, within 10 years of women’s suffrage, the government doubled their tax revenue and expenditure in the USA.
These findings show just how simplistic the notion of privilege is. While men make more on average, it allows women to have access to education, health, and services. The patriarchy is pretty generous after all :^)
"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

Anonymous42I found the answer to everything>>>>>>>
FOD clause for the win!

That is a good article, thanks for posting!
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
not by our supreme feminist leaders Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau.
You got that right,all one has to do is look at the general income tax form to see who gets the most credits
=breaks.If you are a single white male who is not seasonally or self employed ,you sir are screwed big time.
There is just no excuse for you to be single,there fore you pay the highest tax.
I am surprised the gay community is not challenging this
I know ‘ol Justin would bend over frontwards just to appease them and I’d gladly check off a box on my return that said Single-Gay if it meant lower rates + more credits.Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!
Nice article man. Makes me glad i left the western world (along with debts) and moved back to Asia, now running my own business not paying taxes to any government (It either goes to fund c~~~/SJW/cultural marxist bulls~~~ in the west or lines the corrupt pockets of politicians in the east so good either way). The only way to hurt both parties is to make sure they get none or as little of men’s money as possible.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
