Regulating prostitution

[….Participant 305]

Just wanted to share something with you guys I heard on the radio last night while scanning through the channels. I came across a program on CBC (it figures) discussing the regulation of prostitution in Nepal (I think it was Nepal don’t hold me to that…I had quite  a few beers in me at the time). The prostitute  they were interviewing said that while she still did not enjoy it, regulation had made things better for her. When asked how, she said she feels safer because now, if some men even drove by in a car and yelled s~~~ at them, all they would have to do is call the police and they would be arrested. Really? Arrested? Just for yelling s~~~ at them? I’d love to hear you guy’s take on this…can false paternity claims and financial compensation of whores there for s~~~ real and imagined be far behind?  Will regulation of this trade create a whole new class of “victims” with the ability to drag a man through a knothole based just on her say so?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Feminists want to destroy prostitution then pornography.

They will never succeed. First women are the ones that want to become prostitutes. Men don’t just invent them when their horny. My love for women is such that I am heartened that the last bastion of men spending money on pussy will be removed from men’s choices.

That is because too many men will choose to help support these women, I mean “feminists”, s~~~, I mean “prostitutes”.

I truly mean that because MGTOW makes it still tempting to pay these pieces of s~~~.

A few months ago I decided to weaken up and hire a girl. She did the typical up-sell. What we agreed on on the phone would only happen if I paid another 50.00 then when I agreed to that, it was now another 50.00 so I sent her on her way. These girls get really upset if you kick their obvious “perfect” selves out of your hotel room due to lack of any attractiveness as sexual partners.

So, I’m seeing this from the point of view of the many men who go to these women, are ripped off and have no venue for recourse. Unless prostitution is legal like many countries including Australia and Germany, even before the new law prostitutes are a dicey proposition.

Now feminists worldwide…FWW, is the new “party” I’m inventing for the world wide Hillary puppy pile:

Puppy pile, now used to mainly speak of lesbian orgies with a lot of licking involved…just like puppies.

A large pile of people of mixed sexes, cuddling and or heavy petting each other, usually with clothes on, but sometimes without. Not an orgy, usually done only by people who love and/or trust each other. Not always sexual, sometimes just a physical expression of love or endearment amongst multiple participants.

The new law catching on like fire in the feminist countries is trying to destroy prostitution by the new “prostitution is legal but being a john is illegal” law. It’s working every where it is being tried. Feminism is killing prostitution. It makes selling sex legal and buying sex illegal:

Simon Haggstrom, an officer in the prostitution unit of Stockholm police, is on the frontline of this push to stop men from paying for sex. “My job is to arrest as many men buying sex as possible and I think I have arrested about 700 men since 2007. [They] should know that they are taking a huge risk: they are considering going out into the central parts of Stockholm actually buying another human being. We will go after them.”

He says the number of prostitutes has dramatically decreased since the law was introduced, from 2,500 across Sweden in 1998 to about 1,000 today.

Sweden is held up as a model for European reform on prostitution law. Last week, France moved in the same direction, bringing in fines for people who pay for sex. Politicians and police officers from several countries have visited Stockholm, wanting to know what impact the law has had. But the debate is highly polarised. Many experts argue that only by regulating the sex trade and bringing it into the open, as has been done in Germany and the Netherlands, will women get the protection they need.

But porn will always exist. Even a small female figurine is sufficient visual stimulus for men to get aroused. This has been going on for at least 35,000 years as far as anthropologists have proven porn and porn figurines existed.

A little too zoftig for me.

But my point good luck getting men to stop using porn, I guess sexual privation has been a female tool for millenia and porn has been the used by 35,000 year old MGTOW’ers.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[….Participant 305]

Good reply as always  H.R.   I can’t help but wonder when we will hear the cries of “where are all the good Johns?”. Feminism has made most women more trouble than they are worth…now they want to do it with hookers. Like most females lapped up feminism, hookers will want to enjoy the same privileges but then wonder why the hell men stay away from them. Even when it hits them in the pocketbook…they still can’t figure it out.

[Smacktalk73Participant 296]

Prostitution laws, like all of the “victimless crime” laws, do NOT exist to stamp out prostitution or other victimless crimes.  It is very important to see the parasitic relationship between law enforcement/government, and the people committing these crimes.

The real exploitation in a prositute/John relationship is the cop who makes his/her living picking off the low-hanging fruit of lonely males and money-hungry females who walk into the trap set by the law.

There will ALWAYS be women who need money, and there will ALWAYS be men who need sex.  By making it illegal to directly exchange sex for money, you create permanent employment for a certain number of police, prosecutors, jailers, “counselors” and other folks who sell to the general public the idea that there is a “problem” they need to solve.

Same with drugs.  There will ALWAYS be miserable people trying to escape their terrible lives by smoking/shooting up/popping pills or whatever.  There will ALWAYS be enterprising people who need money who say “hey, let me get you something that will make you feel better” to those drug users.  The real exploitation is the drug enforcement person who entraps both the sellers and the buyers, and uses both sides to guarantee themselves permanent employment.

[Anonymous 42]

Hey Smacktalk73, You hit the nail right on the head! That’s why the “alleged” free country (U.S.A.), has the highest prison population IN. THE. WORLD.! And mostly MEN! Women are treated “special” and more times than not, they get a free pass!

[BigDParticipant 3024]

I’ve been all over the world, and the constant I see from country to country is prostitution.  Most places it’s illegal, but a blind eye is turned to it as long as it isn’t in the open.  The idea these women, and sometimes men, are forced into the life is bulls~~~.  Yes, many of these women come from poor backgrounds is true.  However, they are a small percentage compared to the women who do not go into prostitution.  At any given time these women can quit.

I have no respect for any organization that states they are going to stop the “white” slave trade.  Most of these organizations are bulls~~~ and are just trying to push an agenda on other people.

As far as regulating the trade.  I say no.  Here is why.  Everything a government of any kind touches it destroys.  I say you legalize it and let the market sort it out.  The buyer will purchase exactly what they want with the vast amount of options that will be out there.  Safety will come without regulation.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[MendokusaiParticipant 256]

There are “massage parlours” and escorts where you pay for “company” and anything else is BTWN two consenting adults.

This alarms the femnazi’s and traditionalists because it erodes the very fabric of modern society-men no longer wanting marriage or even a relations~~~.

There is no such thing as free love but some prefer to pay for it before -not after the fact.

In the words of Charlie Sheen- You don’t pay a hooker to stay,you pay her to leave!

F~~~ Yeah

[Jackson1888Participant 111]

In a perfect world with no STDs…I support Prostitution 1,000%. You have no f~~~ing idea. I would have a different women every weekend. I would not even give women a second thought after f~~~ing the prositutes. I’d just look through my catologue of Prostitutes and see what I could afford and that would be it.

If that were to happen though, and the whole world of males thought that way, you do realize that the entire system we are living under would fall apart? That’s what’s interesting about MGTOW, it has the potential to create an entirely new system if it become mainstream. Well, actually I shouldn’t say it has the POTENTIAL, it is 100% certain to create a new system.

 

The rest my time would be focused entirely on myself…

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

In some ways I think it would be beneficial to let the feminist f~~~s get the anti-john laws implemented everywhere. Eventually men would realize everything to do with bitches is risky. Sex with gash is simply not worth any f~~~ing thing at all. Risks of rape allegations, risks of incarceration from paying for it, risks of STD’s, loss of income and family when you marry gash, risk of harassment allegations by talking to them.

Those who are MGTOW understand these risks,  the next step is for the regular guys to realize the risks of pussy.

[Jackson1888Participant 111]

Jack: I personally am a sexless MGTOW…

How do you feel about sex generally? What if you were 18 years old knowing what you know now.

Because if I HAD to get laid and I was 18…knowing what I know now, I don’t think there would be any answer.

What advice would you give young dudes who have to get laid once…where would they go to get it???

I think they’d probably be better off having sex with a Goat then any women. (no STD’s) But maybe that’s extreme.

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Yeah, good questions Jackson. Experience and insight has given me the ability to assess pussy as generally worthless. But I have paid for it in the past, jerked off to porn etc. Mostly though, that was because I assumed pussy did have some value and I was missing out by not accessing it.

Then I realized how personally destructive it was to have this belief, and am able to now control those desires because I can see the fallacy behind them. I do wish I had found MGTOW when I was 18.

Even amongst 18 year old dudes there are variances in sexual drives. And in todays gynocentric environment  young men are taught they are all rapists, worthless, encouraged to be manginas, held back in a gynocentric educational system, taught to be ashamed of masculinity. It is very difficult for me to conceive of an existence like that.

Good news is, guys just have to google s~~~ to get some alternate views, find some allies and support like this site, and others that challenge all the f~~~ed up feminist lies they have been polluted with. We are already seeing the drastic drop in marriage rates in the US for young men, they are realizing the risks of that institution. It is only another small step to see the risks of any association with pussy, for example the new rape laws being implemented.

 

[Anonymous 42]

Jackson1888 wrote:

I think they’d probably be better off having sex with a Goat then any women. (no STD’s) But maybe that’s extreme.

Be careful jack, don’t encourage these young guys, they just might try it, then post it here, not a good thing, KeyMaster has enough to do without us getting out of hand.

[USMC0331Participant 40]

I think prostitutes and strippers are the worst kind of bitches personally. If you think straight up paying for sex is a good way to avoid drama go ask Warren Sapp how well that has worked out for him. I could give a damn if they legalize prostitution, I have no interest in paying for pussy. You run the same risks with working girls as you do the sluts you can find anywhere else so why pay for it? I guess your attitude toward sex changes when you get older and you realize it isn’t really worth the trouble most of the time. I’m in my 40’s and I’m no monk or anything, but I don’t waste money and time chasing pussy any more.

[Solid SnakeParticipant 255]

Its legal in some states here in Australia, here in Victoria for example:

<u>Licensed (Commercial) Brothels</u> Brothels are regulated by local council planning. This means the place you work from must meet the requirements of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and have a planning permit issued by the Council. Councils primarily monitor compliance with planning requirements.

Currently brothels are limited to 6 rooms (Prostitution Control Act 1994). Some older brothels, established before June 1995, are larger.

You have the right to refuse to see a client if you think the situation is unsafe or you think the client may be violent. You can’t be fined or punished in any way (Sex Work Regulations 2006).

You must be provided with a free supply of condoms and lubricants at no charge in a legal brothel (Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008).

The proprietor of a brothel must provide clean linen and showers and baths with a continuous and adequate supply of hot and cold water for the use of you and your clients (Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008).

Unless your own client has just used it, you are not required to clean or disinfect a bath or shower in a brothel. If you do clean or disinfect the bath or shower your client just used – you must be provided with protective clothing. Apart from this circumstance you are not required to clean any bath, shower, toilet or spa unless you are employed as a cleaner (Sex Work Regulations 2006).

You should never have to pay a bond or a fine in a legal brothel. Contact Jobwatch (see the services directory) for legal advice if you told you have to pay a bond or a fine.

http://www.scarletalliance.org.au/laws/vic/

A little bit of a breakdown on the laws, they have mandatory STD testing in there too.

Its cleaner going to a licensed brothel then picking up some girl from a nightclub and taking her home.

They’re better off legalising it, regulating it and then they can tax it (tax on pussy except it goes to the Government not your ex wife LOL) and make sure its all above board, the girls are clean and everyone is safe.

[FitzBonesParticipant 304]

I guess sexual privation has been a female tool for millenia

 

@H.R.PufnStuf

Yep and will continue to be used as a weapon against men. Men, as a general rule, have sexual needs above and beyond that of women. By them regulating when/how our needs are sated, they have control over us. Its all about women using sex to control men. It doesnt work so well when we have the option available to go out and buy some when we need it; suddenly they cant use it to control us and they dont like it, so they try to stop it.

"If you can fill the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run,"

[Anonymous 42]

The one regulation I’d like to see (if possible) is latex dipping of the prostitute from head to toe, like a big rubber boot. When she’s done she can peal and re-dip for the next guy. Other than that, I wouldn’t touch her with someone else’s dick!

     

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Smacktalk73 wrote:

By making it illegal to directly exchange sex for money, you create permanent employment for a certain number of police, prosecutors, jailers, “counselors”

Not to mention wedding planners, preachers, justices of the peace, divorce lawyers, judges…

What is marriage any more if not the direct exchange of sex for money?  And it’s a big business, both at the beginning and the end.  And the marriage industry knows competition when it sees it.

[Author]

Posts