Racist / Feminist Political Group in Colorado Against White Men In Office

Topic by Y_

Y_

Home Forums Political Corner Racist / Feminist Political Group in Colorado Against White Men In Office

This topic contains 10 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 2 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #436914
    +2
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    White Men Should Stop Running For Office, Colorado Group Says

    Believe this s~~~? Racism / feminism at its best.

    The Can You Not PAC plans to discourage straight white men from running for office in Colorado’s diverse districts. They hope that will clear the lane for female, minority and LGBTQ candidates.

    Democratic activists Jack Teter and Kyle Huelsman registered the organization last year. At that time they’ve raised $120 from six donations. (WOW!!)

    “It’s the counterbalance to the classic intervention where people ask, ‘Have you thought about ever running for office?’, ” says Huelsman. “We want to ask, ‘Have you ever thought about not running for office?’ ”

    In the short term, the pair plans to focus on Colorado districts that have large blocs of minority voters but tend to elect “traditional” candidates. That includes Aurora and parts of Denver.

    Read the s~~~ here. And beware of hair-loss guys. There are none dumber anywhere else ….

    http://www.cpr.org/news/story/white-men-should-stop-running-office-says-colorado-group

    If you just ate do not open this link.
    http://canyounot.org/

    #436936
    +6
    Thisistheguy123
    thisistheguy123
    Participant
    2063

    Yea, and then everywhere will end up like Sweden.

    I can’t believe these are the problems people have, if you want to beat the white man, then beat him fair and square.
    …Run against him and win

    But no, that won’t happen because he has a higher IQ than these people and will work hard as well as not have a shady past that the media can exploit

    #436940
    +5

    Anonymous
    42

    And they say there’s a war on women?

    I’m their no.1 enemy based on the way light reflects off my skin? How sane is that???

    That’s some Hitler’s Nazi s~~~ in a different time and being worn by a different race!

    Same EVIL, different time, different place…

    #436951
    +3
    Solid
    Solid
    Participant
    7520

    Lets fight against racism, by being racists !

    Basically is that my conclusion reading this. This is not only the lack of logic, but also, lack of brain. Seriously, 120$ ? Any MGTOW movement will get far more money than 1000 times that, why ? Millenals and other s~~~ kind of people have no money, they just suck money from tax payers, thats the truth !

    Feminism for example depends on patriarchy money ! Irony ? No, just fat lazy females that claim how strong and independent they are, but need obviously, someone working to pay for they MC Donalds.

    #436988
    +2
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    In the article we have another example of the left creating new-words for their convenience: i.e.
    “dis/empower and dis/incline people” I think the word the lefty dip-s~~~ is looking for is: disenfranchisement. Yes I know WAY to many syllables for the average lefty to handle—so their goal is to disenfranchise straight white men—wonder what the reaction would be if a group had a goal to disenfranchise blacks—or women—-or gays.

    #437007
    +2
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22521

    n the article we have another example of the left creating new-words for their convenience: i.e.
    “dis/empower and dis/incline people” I think the word the lefty dip-s~~~ is looking for is: disenfranchisement. Yes I know WAY to many syllables for the average lefty to handle—so their goal is to disenfranchise straight white men—wonder what the reaction would be if a group had a goal to disenfranchise blacks—or women—-or gays.

    These progressive fascists have been disenfranchising and oppressing poor and middle-class white men for over fifty years.

    A major backlash has built up by those white men for fifty years of abuse and bigotry against them. The white men are actually enjoying watching as these progressives are having mental breakdown at the prospect of a president the white men voted for may cut the government check to these progressives.

    #437081
    +2
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    A major backlash has built up by those white men for fifty years of abuse and bigotry against them. The white men are actually enjoying watching as these progressives are having mental breakdown at the prospect of a president the white men voted for may cut the government check to these progressives.

    Very true—I suspect their level of hysteria is driven in part by their erroneous belief that white, straight, blue collar guys had been marginalized over the last 30 years—they were wrong.

    #437086
    +3
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22521

    Very true—I suspect their level of hysteria is driven in part by their erroneous belief that white, straight, blue collar guys had been marginalized over the last 30 years—they were wrong.

    White men have been marginalized and oppressed over the last fifty years. And some of the progressives are going crazy because their victims may have the chance to bring some political payback towards them.

    By law, white men are never given the benefit of the doubt in a “he said, she said” situation. By law, white men are the last to be considered for a job and the first to be fired from a job. By law, white men are denied scholarships while women and minorities are offered scholarships. By law, schools and colleges given academic favoritism to women and minorities over white men.

    All the progressives talk about the “glass ceiling” at the top dealing with women.

    Well, President Trump won the election due to white men by the tens of millions being blocked from opportunities by the “glass ceiling” at the bottom known as “affirmative action”.

    #438543
    +1

    Anonymous
    22

    Why does race matter so much to liberals, ‘minorities’ and women?

    #438555
    +1
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    Why does race matter so much to liberals, ‘minorities’ and women?

    I believe in equality for all people and the truth – that is why I am responding with my take. If I get hung for it so be it.

    ‘Cause without the advantages the groups you mention wouldn’t be able to get anywhere on the same footing. Maybe these are needed against discrimination in specific instances – but should not be applied now in most cases.

    Usually a white man does very well against the competition – everything else being equal.

    Yes there have been good people in any society but as a race the whites do things in a way no other group can or have been able to compete with. This is a fact – not racism.

    If you go over the world the only things that worked – and worked well – was put in place by white men over the last five hundred years,

    Oh – I am not including the ancient civilisations but looking at those you can come to a similar conclusion.

    See how f~~~ed up society has become since the non-white racists use skin colour as a weapon? Just put everyone on the same playing field and see what happens. They KNOW what will happen.

    #438569
    +1

    Anonymous
    22

    Yes there have been good people in any society but as a race the whites do things in a way no other group can or have been able to compete with. This is a fact – not racism.

    Have to agree with this. And racist is just a shaming word so no worries.

    Japanese is not a race but I’d say they are also very intelligent people. If the white race did not exist, they’d probably be the ones the western elite wants to introduce to multiculturalism. They’re probably next on the list.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.