Psychotic Perceptual Migration

Topic by InTheCountry

InTheCountry

Home Forums MGTOW Central Psychotic Perceptual Migration

This topic contains 3 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Monk  Monk 6 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #905218
    +2
    InTheCountry
    InTheCountry
    Participant
    199

    Let’s talk about psychotic perceptual migration.

    A psychotic perceptual migration is when someone creates a new reality in their mind that is designed to fit with their preferred emotional state and story of events. The purpose is to alleviate guilt, responsibility and accountability. An example would be if I were to lie to someone about who I was and upon being found out, create a new reality that suggests that the person who found me out is actually a stalker who won’t leave me alone with phone calls accusing me of creating a false self to exploit someone’s trust.

    A psychotic perceptual migration can happen moment to moment with women. These realities are constantly being created by their subconscious to alter the boundaries of perception to suit their preferred emotional state and outcome. If for example you were being targeted with deception and gaslighting to a degree that wore down your resolve leading you to express irritation, the woman will perform a psychotic perceptual migration and enter into a new reality where the very expression of your irritation or anger has no basis and is itself evidence of mental instability “over there.” It is a method of escaping awareness of one’s own agency so that one can believe that they have nothing to do with the consequences of their actions. In other words, I can do whatever I want and however you react is completely disconnected from whatever I have done.

    For example, a person suddenly erupting into anger accusing you of manipulation and deceit when you have never met them before, would be sufficient enough for you to come to the conclusion that they are mentally unwell. However, what if you were a con-artist that conned someone into a position of trust in order to exploit them and then they were to express anger? Then, when the anger expresses itself, perform a psychotic perceptual migration and then convince yourself that this person is mentally unwell and that is the true reason for their apparent baseless expression. This self-mental trickery is a way of always seeing the other person as the root of the problem. When a woman performs a psychotic perceptual migration, the new reality she creates, once entered, is from her perspective the reality that has always existed. Somehow, biologically, they are able to bypass the activation of conscience that torments the mind for perverting the perception of reality and agency with self-deception. In their mind, there is no lying, it is simply the truth. This is why they are so dangerous.

    Now, for some that may have a shred of conscience, there is still a work-around in order to put the conscience into silence. This is done by creating belief consensus in a mini-collective. For example, if I stole from Peter and it bothers me subconsciously that I knew that I did, I could call up ten of my sounding board “friends” and explain to them that I was stolen from. Then, I would take the emotional state of being “upset because I knew I stole,” and parlay that into the new reality, which is the one where I was stolen from. Then, by hijacking the emotional state from the true reality and performing a mental sleight of hand, I can then trick myself into believing that “I am upset because I am stolen from.” It is using the truth of an emotional state, such as “I am upset or sad,” and then connecting that emotional state to another created false reality. This way, it is “partly true.” The broadcasting of the emotional state enhances the ability to sell the lie to the listeners and create the needed consensus to solidify the lie. Creating false consensus and agreement is a tool to help one deceive themselves. “If they all believe it too, then I feel better about believing it myself.” The part of it that is true, is the emotional state, being sad or upset. Then, if I hijack that emotion and tether it to another false reality, I create the illusion of “true” to myself. This is advanced deception and only able to be executed by those without a conscience. The social consensus of telling my false friends and allies the story as I wish to see it helps cement my belief in it in order to alleviate and divert the torment of the conscience for wrong doing. People’s beliefs seem more real if they have numbers to back them up in circles of social consensus confirmation. Women use this consensus maneuver in conjunction with hijacking emotional states to create a new reality in order to excuse themselves from responsibility, accountability and agency. This is the process of psychotic perceptual migration.

    #905222
    +2
    InTheCountry
    InTheCountry
    Participant
    199

    The consensus maneuver as a tool of self deception is using a biological reality, which is the sense of “reality” created by tribal agreement. If the tribe or group agrees, it feels more real. The most successful tools for deception are ones that use naturally occurring biologically rooted social phenomena. The key to achieving a perceptual migration successfully is to drive it home with a sense of “it feels so.” A consensus is the fastest way to create that feeling, which is the glue that holds the perception in place.

    #905223
    +2
    InTheCountry
    InTheCountry
    Participant
    199

    In other words, the biologically rooted social phenomenon of being agreeable to women as a form of emotional and physical protection, is the very thing they use to alter tribal perception and create new realities to excuse themselves from responsibility and agency.

    #905280
    +3
    Monk
    Monk
    Participant
    16995

    A long winded way of saying that reality is whatever she says it is, and that she creates these realities in order to avoid accountability.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.