Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Protest against equality by women?
This topic contains 6 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by
Ciagha 4 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Feminazi’s at it again, this time they are protesting that a man got elected to a position of manager of womens issues, if he was elected legally according to internal policy/guidelines (which he was) then what is the problem?
Petition launched to remove man elected to role of women’s officer for University of Tasmania student union
Students are petitioning against the election of a man to the position of women’s officer for the Tasmanian University Union (TUU), urging the union to replace him with a woman.
The union held by-elections earlier this year when James Ritchie was elected to the position of women’s officer for the Student Representative Council.
A petition started by University of Tasmania (UTAS) Women’s Collective on the website change.org has attracted 700 signatures in the space of 24 hours.
The petition states that Mr Ritchie “was elected to the role of women’s officer unconstitutionally and unethically and yet the TUU staff refuses to disqualify his candidacy”.
Lucy Haas, who sits on the executive committee of UTAS’ Women’s Collective, told 936 ABC Hobart’s Sarah Gillman that Mr Ritchie should stand down from the role.
“The aim that we have with this petition is to ask for James Ritchie to do the honourable thing and stand down as a lot of the UTAS student population believe that him taking the role of women’s officer is not correct,” she said.
The TUU’s requirements for the position does not include a preferred gender identification for the role, stating only that “an interest in higher education and student issues would be advantageous”.
But Women’s Collective said the state’s Anti-Discrimination Commissioner issued a ruling in 2000 ruling that the women’s officer must “identify” as a woman on the grounds that “the role exists to advocate for women who experience oppression in relation to men”.
The current state Anti-Discrimination Officer, Robin Banks, said she could see no legal reason why that job would need to be filled by a woman.
“There isn’t a current exemption in place and it means that it’s a matter for the electorate, in this case the students of UTAS, to determine who they elect to that role,” she said.
“I think it’s potentially really exciting that a man is concerned about women’s issues and wants to help women to represent those issues to the powers that be.”
“I guess the question is: is that the most effective way to do it? Are there things about the role that a woman would be better suited to do?”
However, she said there were cases in which a man would have difficulties in providing adequate representation for the women he represents.
“Where we have students from a range of cultural backgrounds there may be women students who may not speak to a man about issues that they face on campus to do with their gender,” she said.
“It would be pretty odd for men to think that they could be well represented by a woman if there was a men’s role.
“People with a disability generally want to be represented by people with the same lived experience that they have.”
Young Liberals accused of using women’s issues a ‘plaything’
Tasmania’s Young Labor president Adam Clarke accused the Young Liberal-dominated representative council of playing politics with the position.
“This whole nonsense around the women’s officer position at the northern UTAS campus has come about because the Young Liberals see it as their plaything,” Mr Clarke said in a statement.
“It’s very sad and troubling to see how the youth of the liberal movement view women’s rights.”
Mr Ritchie was one of two candidates to run for the position of women’s officer.
The other was a woman but Ms Haas said it was difficult to explain why Mr Ritchie was elected over a woman.
“From having discussion on social media a lot of people have said that during the election process which was held online that they were unable to access the site or it wasn’t working correctly,” she said.
“Other people have said that they weren’t even aware that the by-election was occurring.”
The University of Queensland Union women’s officer, Amy Jelacic, replied to the petition, saying the appointment of a man to the position was extremely disappointing.
“It is an embarrassment for TUU and for the student union community around Australia, and I trust it will be rectified as soon as possible,” she said.
“This incident is a poor reflection on the TUU returning officer, on Mr Ritchie, and on all others who enabled this farce to occur.”
I thought women wanted equality?
Obviously not they just want control of everything such as we have been learning day in and day out.
“It’s very sad and troubling to see how the youth of the
liberal movementview women’s rights.”uhh what? you mean were not doing a good enough job on viewing women’s rights already? my F~~~ what’s next: a f~~~ing beeper that goes off if a man is waking to porn, and gets a “pervert fine” IDK…what more do they want?
Like any of them have actually experienced oppression.
Why is it these f~~~ nuts miss the rather glaringly obvious fact that by wanting to remove or deny a person from taking a position that person was elected to do in a fair and democratic election based solely on that persons gender they are acting in a rather oppressive way.
Admittedly after seeing his acceptance speech i will concede it could have been better……
MrDextro:
What more to they want? Well, how about a world based on the social structure of ants and bees, where males exist only to produce sperm and then are essentially discarded once they’ve done their duty.
Here’s what they want. They say it all the time, they don’t try to hide it. It’s just that men are such pussy beggers they don’t see the world that is being built against them and their sons. Of course excluding the men and boys who have been through the feminist re-education camps.
At least three further requirements supplement the strategies of environmentalists if we are to create and preserve a less violent world. I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. . . .
From a large MGTOW post with a lot of details:
/forums/search/the+final+plan/
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

Anonymous42Hey HR, great you’re back, the place seemed a little empty without you, I enjoy your posts….
A person democratically elected into a role and they still complain. Only 2 possible options and they voted for the man, a 50/50 and they still fail.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
