Preventing arguments by being indifferent

[Anonymous 18]

Inspired by the many cool posts by Stealthy MGTOW, I would like to ask members here about their take on avoiding arguments/confrontations with ‘them” and going stealth-mode.

One of my acquaintances was going on about nice guys and how they are just selfish assholes for not wanting to remain friends with a girl they once liked but since she didn’t reciprocate the feeling and f~~~ed bad boy Bronco instead. Her argument was that guy friend (with feelings for the girl) should stick it out and stay friends. Not being her friend just makes the guy a ‘f~~~er wearing a nice guy mask who wanted just to get in her pants’.

Suffice to say I could have used her logic to argue that the girl should let the guy friend f~~~ her for the sake of friendship and not use a ‘you are such a perfect guy, just not my type’ mask to use him as an emotional tampon for Bronco boy’s love itch and her hurt feels after the fact. But I didn’t.

I am thinking the more I am aware of the hypocrisy of the c~~~world, at times (only a matter of time) some oversized (both physical and prescription glass size wise) self-appointed scholar bitch would get on my nerves. But I would rather not give away the cards I hold. Every one of these stereotypical c~~~s feminazis mental issues feminists has only few generic retorts for every MGTOW philosophy: rape culture, misogyny, patriarchy, sprinkled with some shaming language. Nothing new, we all heard that s~~~.

What do some of you wiser fellas suggest about practicing indifference in the heat of the moment and avoiding any verbal argument?

(If it was any rational person I don’t mind debate but these feminists type argue with emotions instead of logic, and I rather not be subjected to some of her women’s studies fictional stories).

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Imagine these scenarios:

1) The guy friend decides to date one of that girl’s female friends. The female friend tells the girl her male friend is the best lover she’s ever had. She has sweet orgasms all night long. Then the self-righteous bitch gets jealous.

2) The girl one day gets introduced to a guy she has a crush on. They have a nice conversation and the guy casually mentions he has a girlfriend. At the end of the conversation, the guy she can’t have says, “I’m glad we met. I think we would be good friends.” The bitch walks away with smoke coming out of her ears and wishing she could run over his girlfriend with her car.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

“nice guy” should be able to get on with his life and find a girl who will reciprocate his feelings. the only one wearing a mask is friend girl who will dangle that carrot in front of nice guy’s face for as long as it suits her. no guy is obliged to be a back up plan. i would say that even if it lead to an argument not because it’s the smart thing to do but rather because women trying to say how a “real man” should behave is a pet peeve of mine. i don’t keep women friends so it’s not something i have to worry about.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 2]

The indifference angle is mine too. I care very little to explain what I know is true to people that will deny that very truth despite the proof being right in front of them. I checked out. It is no longer my problem. I leave that issue to blue pill men. My current squeeze is receptive to the Red Pill and likes unapologetic, “biological” men (as opposed to pussywhipped cultural ones).

[RedDawnParticipant 1391]

(If it was any rational person I don’t mind debate but these feminists type argue with emotions instead of logic, and I rather not be subjected to some of her women’s studies fictional stories).

If they were truly interested in equality they would be open to logical discussion; they are not.

Therefore you fight guerilla tactics with guerilla tactics or not at all. The war in Afghanistan is a prime example of how well fighting the problem head on works.

Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

[Anonymous 42]

“Preventing arguments by being indifferent” That belongs in a glass case! Every MGHOW should have that engraved or branded on ALL his neurotransmitters!

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I wouldn’t waste my time or energy arguing with a female. Scratch the surface and they are all feminists and want all the benefits feminism brings. Rock that boat and see how fast you get thrown to the sharks.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

I’m not one of those wiser guys, but the answer seems obvious to me. Never argue offline. Nobody cares what your opinion is and you will just p~~~ them off by sharing. Even if you try to remain calm, they’ll accuse you of being rude or mean just because you challenged their opinion. I’ll argue for a little bit online just in case there is someone else reading who might change their view based on my argument but that’s it. Trying to find a rational person to debate is like trying to find a NAWALT. They may be out there, but why waste time searching for them?

[MOWsince95Participant 1446]

Always ignore/be-indifferent-to them. It drives them up a f~~~ing wall. Plus there is no benefit to your trying to convince them that they are deluded, the chances of which due to the depth of their delusion are about 0% anyway.

And at the office, keep it totally shut. Was never one for religion but I heard a pastor once say …
. . . . . . . . . “A word unspoken you control. A word once spoken controls you.”
Very freakin’ wise statement, especially in this hyper-political bulls~~~ planet we are on today. Just keep it quiet and undermine the f~~~ out of it.

If you are MGTOW when you are young you have no heart.
If you're not MGTOW when you are 20 you have no brain.

[RoyDalParticipant]

MOWsince95 wrote:

Always ignore/be-indifferent-to them. It drives them up a f~~~ing wall. Plus there is no benefit to your trying to convince them that they are deluded, the chances of which due to the depth of their delusion are about 0% anyway.

And at the office, keep it totally shut. Was never one for religion but I heard a pastor once say …
. . . . . . . . . “A word unspoken you control. A word once spoken controls you.”
Very freakin’ wise statement, especially in this hyper-political bulls~~~ planet we are on today. Just keep it quiet and undermine the f~~~ out of it.

Yep, you nailed it.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[UntamedParticipant]

I actually agree with them and leave them in disaray. I’ll keep it going looking to see how long she talks until she realises I’m just nodding away thinking of something else and then crack up! Her venomous retorts afterwards are my rewards! Funny thing is they keep coming back for more. I don’t get it.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Anonymous 25]

They are just trying to satisfy their own need for attention. Either that or causing an argument to induce context blindness to make you easy to manipulate.

Ignoring them nips that in the bud. Simplest most effective strategy is indifference. Walk off. No eye contact, no words, no acknowledgement, nothing.

Reinforced behaviours recur. Failure to reinforce leads to extinction of the behaviour. Plus it’s safer and you get to enjoy your own life nut job free.

[OldBillParticipant]

Polite, terse, dismissive. That’s all you need to remember. Polite, terse, dismissive.

She asks “What do you think of yadda yadda yadda yakkity smakkity…”

You answer “I have no opinion on that subject.”

She asks “Why?”

You answer “My reasons are my own and I will not share them with you. Good bye.”

And you walk away.

Do not engage them. Do not act as their emotional tampons. Their “opinions” are merely cries for attention. Any answer other than a non-answer is the wrong one.

Go your own way.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[roninParticipant 341]

Untamed wrote:

I actually agree with them and leave them in disaray. I’ll keep it going looking to see how long she talks until she realises I’m just nodding away thinking of something else and then crack up! Her venomous retorts afterwards are my rewards! Funny thing is they keep coming back for more. I don’t get it.

That’s exactly what I always do, and when they show me their rage, I say “I agree with you, that’s what you want, don’t you?”. Then I laugh when their rage grows even higher, and they keep coming for more because they feel that they didn’t “win” the argument and want to destroy my opinions completely, but I do the same strategy again and again, it’s hilarious.

We are at the dawn of a New Era. We are the Vanguard.-Greg Honda.

[Anonymous 29]

Anonymous wrote:

Inspired by the many cool posts by Stealthy MGTOW, I would like to ask members here about their take on avoiding arguments/confrontations with ‘them”

Speaking for myself, I never pass up a chance for an argument with them, knowing full fell that I know exactly how to rub their noses into s~~~ they spew. . . . . 99% of feminists are only parroting what they heard or read about, without actually understanding most of it. Watching them squirm and fiddle, totally unable to get out of a mind block caused by their ignorance is worth it.

Anonymous wrote:

going stealth-mode.

Too old.
Too independent.
Too much money.
Too much ” I just don’t give a s~~~”

[LowKeyParticipant 702]

I look at them like they’re stupid and walk away.

Don't let defeat, defeat you; Let defeat be your greatest teacher.

[stopmockingmanParticipant 441]

Anonymous wrote:

Not being her friend just makes the guy a ‘f~~~er wearing a nice guy mask who wanted just to get in her pants’.

Be my friend baby suck my c~~~- proper response, here.
Yeah.

[MemberParticipant 323]

I think there is a lot of truth in the observation that men and women can’t just be friends. If you aren’t screwing them really what is the point of keeping most women around? They are not worth the effort if they don’t put out on a regular basis. No other reason to put up with the bitching, lies, deceptive practices, poor spending habits, unreliable nature………on second thought just avoid them. It always ends up badly for guys……

[Anonymous 3]

If there was a point to arguing with people there would be no MGTOW. We would have defeated feminism with logic and reason 30 years ago instead.

Dale Carnegie is right, even though he didn’t write specifically about feminism.

One thing that I think MGTOW need to understand, and I’ve sort of mentioned this a few times, is that as an MGTOW you are more than likely superior to the average person. Your rightful place is as a noble, formerly a Lord or a slaveowner. You don’t answer to them, they are supposed to answer to you. It is a fool’s errand to respect and discuss things with inferior intellects. They can not reason, for if they could, they would never have believed in the garbage they are arguing in the first place.

The elites have forced feminism, crony capitalism, greed and avarice onto the public because it benefits them, and they are evil. The general public accepts it and promotes it because they are idiots. You are here because you aren’t an elite but you’re not an idiot either. You’re stuck in between. Since we can’t beat the elites, and we can’t escape the commoners, our best course of action is to just ghost. That way the elites don’t see us as a threat, and the commoners don’t get it into their stupid heads to pester us. Easier said than done, but the alternative is overthrowing the elites and taking over ourselves, and that’s not going to happen.

[Author]

Posts