Post Sex Accusation Trend

[BDParticipant 1146]

Hello Gentlemen,

There seems to be a recent trend with post sex accusations originating from women….

Donald Trump’s ex accused him of being too aggressive, then we have Bill Cosby, Tiger’s mistresses, Monica Lewinski,  etc etc… endless examples…

This could be a very dangerous situation for the PUAs of Mgtow….. The public always assumes guilt without even a charge or a trial….

And then there are the lawsuits, because with women it is always about money or revenge.

How do we really even prevent this? Do we need pre and post sex contracts to state that nothing happened?

All I can really say is what the f~~~…..

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/report-reveals-donald-trumps-ex-wife-once-accused-him-of-rape-his-lawyer-says-you-cant-rape-your-spouse

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[HitmanParticipant]

seems the power trip never ends .. i understand no means no , but DAMN ,  raping your spouse ? oxymoron , no ? been married three times and was up front ,pussy on demand !the rare ” no ” i could handle , but a rape charge ? wtf ?

[BestoftherestParticipant 285]

The sad fact is the social definition of rape has changed, not the legal definition, causing women like this to throw out slander to get money to be shut up.  I doubt any one was raped in the real sense of the word, rather they had two glasses of wine with their husband and had sex.  Fast forward to today and they can claim, under the social definition, it was rape and people will shout down at the man ruining his name further. These are vindictive women and if it isn’t a claim to get money that its to slander the man just cause. After all most of these males money comes from sponsers, have a rape claim coming from a wife will drive sponsors away.

 

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln

[KeymasterKeymaster]

How the f~~~ can there be “rape” in a marriage. A marriage contract is a VIP pass to backstage vagina. Anal is still for sale, but vagina is guaranteed. A Ivana accuses her husband of “rape” decades after the fact? What’s next. Is it molestation when a fireman rescues a child from a burning orphanage?

You bet! Are you sitting down?

20-year old feminist Cassidy Boon speaks of a “traumatic experience”
A man saved me from drowning, but now I am suing him for rape because he touched me.
http://www.thestatelyharold.com/#!A-man-saved-me-from-drowning-but-now-I-am-suing-him-for-rape-because-he-touched-me/cmbz/557480280cf219f1772c9214

Post sex accusation? There doesn’t even need to be any sex involved! And that’s how bats~~~ crazy women are.
But when she does spread her legs, it’s not “rape” either.

Let’s take one example in the Cosby case:

In the case of Janice Dickenson…. she’s a f~~~ing train wreck.

But she also used to f~~~ Jack Nicholson. Are we REALLY to believe that Jack Nicholson bought her flowers first? Here she is saying QUOTE: “How I seduced some of the most famous – and slimy – men in Hollywood, by I’m A Celebrity wildcat Janice Dickinson”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-494599/How-I-seduced-famous–slimy–men-Hollywood-Im-A-Celebrity-wildcat-Janice-Dickinson.html

She doesn’t have a case. She’s a f~~~ing disaster with ZERO credibility. According to her own headline, she seduced THEM. Just another example of how these women had best shut their f~~~ing cake holes if they are going to try and make a man look bad. “I’ve been up all night, f~~~ing Jack Nicholson. “, she says. End quote. She didn’t say “I was up all night f~~~ing”. She had to throw his name in – even after he told her NOT to. You don’t have to be a sex expert to know that the female doesn’t do “the f~~~ing” anyway. And in her twisted mind, all the men she set out to screw and “seduce” were all slimy anyway. Before she screws them – she already hates them! And are we really to believe this proud starf~~~er was mounted by Bill Cosby (exemplary TV Dad of all time) against her will?

Janice Dickinson on meeting Steven Spielberg:
“I couldn’t remember meeting him – I must have been really drunk.
The alcohol-induced blackouts that I was starting to suffer from didn’t help my recall.”

If you can’t even remember meeting Stephen Spielberg, then why are you pretending to remember sex you initiated as some kind of thing you didn’t want to happen? Self-inflicted alcohol-induced blackouts and she expects someone to believe her when she cries “rape” 20 years after the fact?

F~~~ off.

There’s some first class comedy right there.

If Cosby ever needs a defense against her…. have him call me.
Christ, even Justin Bieber could win this argument. While drunk.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MOWsince95Participant 1446]

Given the s~~~-biased court system in the country, Keymaster, I have no doubt that Dickenson could win. Should she? Hell no … but she very well could.

And the MSM gangbang of Cosby going on is disgusting, but that being said the lesson for every guy is to beware in every possible way – there is no woman on the planet (excluding your moms) who gives a s~~~ about you or your welfare and betterment. It’s all what can they make you do or how much skin they can rip off your torso with her salty claws. 95% of the time if s~~~ goes to court the male will lose, so you just have to avoid these messes and rent whatever services you need.

If you are MGTOW when you are young you have no heart.
If you're not MGTOW when you are 20 you have no brain.

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

Based on canadian law; as of 2012 or so; you can not consent if under the influence of any substance(s).

So, technically… signing a sex agreement would do diddly squat, as she can always be like, “i was drunk” or, “i had a few too many beers” or whatever… on top of it; there is no definition of how much the substance has to effect you; so, even a chick with a hangover can pull out the rape card; heck, technically a chick on f~~~ing birth control could pull out the rape card; as the birth control gave her a mood swing!

Also based on canadian law… consent can be withdrawn after the deed; in case it was caused by “peer  pressure” or any form of extortion… and there is NO TIME LIMIT! When this new law/bill was coming into effect… there were so many damn women spouting out s~~~ like, “i didn’t consent to having sex with my husband on this one night 10 years ago… he raped me… plz give me money”

Best to stay away from Canadian girls 😛

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

20-year old feminist Cassidy Boon speaks of a “traumatic experience”

A man saved me from drowning, but now I am suing him for rape because he touched me.

http://www.thestatelyharold.com/#!A-man-saved-me-from-drowning-but-now-I-am-suing-him-for-rape-because-he-touched-me/cmbz/557480280cf219f1772c9214

My blood was BOILING reading this. However, if you scroll down to the bottom of the page, and click on the black section where it says The Stately Harold, it says next to it:

“This is satire”.

Its in black on black text. I however do NOT think this is funny. And why they made it so difficult to see that it says its satire is f~~~ing weird. I only saw it because someone mentioned it in the comments section. They said that site is a satirical site. I dont think its funny, and what’s worse some dumb chick might read it, take it seriously, and change her views because of it. I take some solace in knowing its not real though.

 

Resident cynic.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

MOWsince95 wrote:

Given the s~~~-biased court system in the country, Keymaster, I have no doubt that Dickenson could win. Should she? Hell no … but she very well could.

Win or lose, she loses. Because every beautiful woman dies twice.

She can’t make an easy living with her looks anymore and will never be a celebrated front page model ever again.
Nature ensures justice is served on bitches like this. She will be living out her own personal version of hell. Alone.

… and then she will get to do it all over again.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

@ancientwisdom

Ancientwisdom wrote:

“This is satire”.

Yeah I get that. But I also started out being “satirical” myself.

Or did I??? Depends on how you perceive it.

Is it REALLY satire??

A sane person would look at the Trump story and the Janice Dickson Cosby/rape story and label THAT “satire”. They must be f~~~ing joking.
The REALITY of what’s going on out there is the satire.

It’s disgraceful. There is something sick and wrong with the world when “he saved my life so I will now accuse him of rape because he touched me” is “satire” at all. It’s not even fit for print. And some c~~~ who thought she was being “funny” got a paycheck for that.

Who thinks s~~~ like that UP?
Nothing but a bunch of hocus-pocus silly tricks and nonsense.

It’s all in their perceptions.
It’s all in their perceptions.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[felixParticipant 406]

Keymaster wrote:

Yeah I get that. But I also started out being “satirical” myself.

A little off topic with the satirical thingy.  When I took the red pill test a couple of times I got sent back to square one because I selected the funniest response.  Of course the last question with the Disney ‘special people’ movie.  I am like, “WTF how do I know” so I just picked one and got a pass, then I realized it was probably all of them. LOL

more throttle ..... less brakes.....

[KeymasterKeymaster]

@felix oh you’re talking about the quiz http://mgtow.com/quiz

Now that’s a great example! We had fun making that.
It’s tricky because it very difficult to know if it’s satire – or if it’s reality presented as satire – or just brutal truth.

Good eye.

A blue pill person will take the quiz and leave infuriated.

A red pill person will take it and want to take it again. Quite the lolz.

The disney movie “the Incredibles” is the correct answer. The core debate of the film is the idea that nobody is “special” and everyone is “equal”. In one scene, the boy is chatting with his mom who is telling him he can’t be special, or exceptional. He has to “fit in”.

Then she sighs and gives him the cliché that “Everyone is special”.

To which the boy responds: “…. which is just another way of saying NOBODY is”.

Drives the point home, that people who pound their fists on the table for “equality”, will never get to bitch about not being the winner in a race. And the point of the question is to make the participant understand “equality is bulls~~~ and it’s bad for you”.

A red-pill person will understand and appreciate that.
“Everyone is special” is for non-thinkers who are complacent and lazy.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[InvisibleManParticipant 134]

Well now women are accusing other women of these types of things. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-28/prisoner-star-maggie-kirkpatrick-charged-with-child-sex-offences/6652464

[BDParticipant 1146]

Keymaster wrote:

And in her twisted mind, all the men she set out to screw and “seduce” were all slimy anyway. Before she screws them – she already hates them! And are we really to believe this proud starf~~~er was mounted by Bill Cosby (exemplary TV Dad of all time) against her will? Janice Dickinson on meeting Steven Spielberg: “I couldn’t remember meeting him – I must have been really drunk. The alcohol-induced blackouts that I was starting to suffer from didn’t help my recall.” If you can’t even remember meeting Stephen Spielberg, then why are you pretending to remember sex you initiated as some kind of thing you didn’t want to happen? Self-inflicted alcohol-induced blackouts and she expects someone to believe her when she cries “rape” 20 years after the fact? F~~~ off.

Thank you KeyMaster, another epic post from you, I still think you should put your posts together and sell them as a book… I wasn’t sure about wording it properly for this thread, but you definitely got the point across that I was reaching for.

Bestoftherest wrote:

The sad fact is the social definition of rape has changed, not the legal definition, causing women like this to throw out slander to get money to be shut up.

That’s interesting, I guess I agree, and the social agenda is to assume that any MAN that is accused is guilty. Women really have nothing to lose here…

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

BD wrote:

Hello Gentlemen, There seems to be a recent trend with post sex accusations originating from women….

Yes I’ve seen this new trend.

BD wrote:

The public always assumes guilt without even a charge or a trial…. 

Of course they do because they are f~~~ing stupid. They run around like a herd of Angry Rhinos and trample anyone that they don’t like(guilty or innocent). I hope that they burn in hell for it(assuming that hell actually exists).

BD wrote:

And then there are the lawsuits, because with women it is always about money or revenge. 

I’m pretty sure that it’s just about the money because this is a Capitalist Society. We are the victims of social injustice so I don’t know what the hell women need revenge for anyway.

BD wrote:

How do we really even prevent this?

We can solve this by video taping every sexual encounter that we have(no contract necessary). It’s solvable and I am a problem solver. What can I say? Vote J.D Silvernail for president(just kidding).

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[RoyDalParticipant]

How do we really even prevent this? Do we need pre and post sex contracts to state that nothing happened?

A written and witnessed contract should help. That makes sense. But, we are dealing with a modern day witch hunt. Nothing will save the accused once the mob turns on him.

Avoid contact with the non-professionals, or risk getting tied to a stake in the middle of a bonfire. That’s pretty much it.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RoyDalParticipant]

News: Don’t Change the Law, Change the Language – Turd Flinging Monkey

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

A problem PUAs have, is that they can’t keep walking away.  So long as you have some way where you need a woman, you aren’t going to have as much power as you need to do what you need to do.  So, expect for feminists to end up pushing in this area.  PUAs get held up by feminists as proof that men objectify women just for sex, and get Blue Pill men to agree with them on this.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Solution suggested by the police to protect themselves from this bulls~~~:

Body Cam’s

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Author]

Posts