POLL: Which are you?

[EskimospyParticipant 841]

I’m C. I would date them and f~~~ them, but not so far as simping and white knighting to do those things. As for B, I can be an acquaintance to a woman, but not an actual friend. I find that friendships with women are one sided serving to benefit the woman only. I’m not ready to be an A, perhaps someday I will. D and E are totally out of the question for me.

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Anonymous wrote:

dyd, smart ass, I already went that route.

how you doin bro? you gonna make it through the day?

i hope things work out for the good, regarding your son. day by day i pray that whatever i taught my kids sticks, and they don’t fall apart and im not there to catch them. s~~~, i cant even tell them where i am if they need me. f~~~. they think im still in Kansas somewhere.

hold fast brother, your boy knows you love him in your case, to the ends of the earth.

Haha. Hey man im good thanks you? Well, i am ‘good’ when the old woman isnt up my ass and she wonders why im up all night and dont get much sleep? The night is the only time i get a f~~~ing break from her so i make the most of it.

The whole f~~~ing world revolves around her just like every other women.

She’s a cancer to my well being.

[AutoliteParticipant]

TaoTheMgtowWanderer wrote:

C) is about as far as i am willing to go for poontang,

I gotta respect your courage. It sounds like you’d be the type of guy who goes swimming with sharks with a bleeding dead chicken tied around your neck or get into a UFC cage fight with a congregation of bi-polar alligators…

[Freedom Not SlaveryParticipant 508]

I am currently a C for this.

[Professor ChaosParticipant 489]

A. Only interact with women when it’s necessary at work.

[JVBParticipant]

F – willing to date but no kids, marriage or cohabitation.

Peace is > piece.

[MTGMGTOWParticipant 235]

Somewhere between A and B, leaning toward A. I have to interact with women sometimes at work, so I don’t have the option of completely ignoring them.

In high school, I had a female friend who I played video games with and we gave each other s~~~ just like she was one of my guy friends. She was attractive, but I didnt feel anything for her and never felt like going beyond friends.

But it’s rare for a female “friend” to not use you as an emotional tampon or try to extract something else from you. So I don’t seek that kind of friendship anymore.

I've had to learn lessons the hard way more times than I should. I've been very fortunate to find MGTOW when I did. Swallowing the Red Pill saved my future.

[LightsOnParticipant 22]

Anonymous wrote:

I want to bang this hambeast on the front porch and make babies with her if I can safely maneuver down this trench and fire my love gun at the target just below the main port.. Lots of babies. Three or four, at least, and in four years, she can divorce me and I can go back to court again and again and again because the low pressure warm water fountain in the hallway is so f~~~ing refreshing.

Shades of Hunter S. Thompson. Belly laugh achieved, thank you.

I wish I could say I voted option A but I still have this sick compulsion to f~~~ them. However I would never be “friends” with them, nor would I “date” them per se, so I’m gonna go with None Of The Above.

[CombatRollParticipant 2594]

F) Stuck in the prison of marriage – digging my tunnel to freedom with a soup spoon.

[Anonymous 5]

PistolPete wrote:

A—-anything else opens the door to the manipulative illusion they offer. Anything but A is self delusion. Why can’t you just be friends? Would you pal around with a cobra? Would you shake hands/paws with a tiger? To be “friends” implies that BOTH parties have interests and virtues that compliment the other. And we know by definition women are narcissistic, shallow liars who are only interested in what benefits them—its a zero sum game. WHY would anyone participate in this arrangement.

There is an easy way to cure this peculiar delusion. Go watch the movie “Return of the night of the living dead” Half way through the flick they have a zombie woman tied down to a table and they question her…anytime I meet a woman I think back to the rotting corpse answering questions…and then look at the woman…think of the zombie…look at the woman….repeat until cured.

PistolPete wrote:

A—-anything else opens the door to the manipulative illusion they offer. Anything but A is self delusion. Why can’t you just be friends? Would you pal around with a cobra? Would you shake hands/paws with a tiger? To be “friends” implies that BOTH parties have interests and virtues that compliment the other. And we know by definition women are narcissistic, shallow liars who are only interested in what benefits them—its a zero sum game. WHY would anyone participate in this arrangement.

There is an easy way to cure this peculiar delusion. Go watch the movie “Return of the night of the living dead” Half way through the flick they have a zombie woman tied down to a table and they question her…anytime I meet a woman I think back to the rotting corpse answering questions…and then look at the woman…think of the zombie…look at the woman….repeat until cured.

Dude, it might be easy for you, to go Monk. But remember, there’s MGTOW’s in their early twenties, like myself. Yeah, try to monk mode in your early twenties…

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

CombatRoll wrote:

F) Stuck in the prison of marriage – digging my tunnel to freedom with a soup spoon.

Where are you?? A Seal 6 Extraction mission is in order!!!

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

For those that are (C), what’s good boundaries? Like only bang her at HER place, NEVER your place? We don’t want these bitches ever knowing where we live, right? How much time will you spend on chick before move on if don’t hit gold?

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I make the decision between these choices one woman at a time, as I meet them. 90% of the women I meet inspire me to A. about 9% inspire me to B. About 0.9%, or around 1 in 100, I would risk C. I really consider D – cohabitation and E – marriage to be essentially the same. As soon as you meet the common law period in your area, the risks are indistinguishable.

In my life of about half century, I have met one E.

After a couple years as a C, I married her.

I would be several years closer to retirement if I would have made her an A the first day I met her…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Anonymous 0]

Anonymous wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

A—-anything else opens the door to the manipulative illusion they offer. Anything but A is self delusion. Why can’t you just be friends? Would you pal around with a cobra? Would you shake hands/paws with a tiger? To be “friends” implies that BOTH parties have interests and virtues that compliment the other. And we know by definition women are narcissistic, shallow liars who are only interested in what benefits them—its a zero sum game. WHY would anyone participate in this arrangement.

There is an easy way to cure this peculiar delusion. Go watch the movie “Return of the night of the living dead” Half way through the flick they have a zombie woman tied down to a table and they question her…anytime I meet a woman I think back to the rotting corpse answering questions…and then look at the woman…think of the zombie…look at the woman….repeat until cured.

PistolPete wrote:

A—-anything else opens the door to the manipulative illusion they offer. Anything but A is self delusion. Why can’t you just be friends? Would you pal around with a cobra? Would you shake hands/paws with a tiger? To be “friends” implies that BOTH parties have interests and virtues that compliment the other. And we know by definition women are narcissistic, shallow liars who are only interested in what benefits them—its a zero sum game. WHY would anyone participate in this arrangement.

There is an easy way to cure this peculiar delusion. Go watch the movie “Return of the night of the living dead” Half way through the flick they have a zombie woman tied down to a table and they question her…anytime I meet a woman I think back to the rotting corpse answering questions…and then look at the woman…think of the zombie…look at the woman….repeat until cured.

Dude, it might be easy for you, to go Monk. But remember, there’s MGTOW’s in their early twenties, like myself. Yeah, try to monk mode in your early twenties…

I am monking as best I can in my early twenties. It is quite sucessful. You CAN do it if you want to inspite of urges and desires. I at one point became numb to women, I felt only apathy. After enough red pills and enough of the gynocentric, hypergamous, experiences all I see in women is a black hole that will take everything from you from your freedom to your happiness. Its repulsive and makes going monk easier, not that it is easy. It also has to do with the value you place on those urges and desires.

Each man has his own values, and monking is not for everyone either. Its your own way make it work for you. Dont feel monking is the endall way to go. There is no right way to GYOW. MGTOW has no pillars since it is at the descretion of the beholder.

Age has nothing to do with deciding to go monk or keeping to it.

I have also fallen off the wagon at one point while attempting to go monk. So even if you go monk there is no gaurantee you wont end up goofing up now and then. Im sure Ill goof again too.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Is “going monk” same as (A)?

[IntellectualSaviorParticipant 1238]

I am currently a (B) but I want to be an (A). I can’t just remove female friends out of my life but I keep my distance with them.

When I have a pen in my hands, it's lethal.

[hmskl’dParticipant 6406]

surfdude12 wrote:

hmskl’d 12:02 wrote:

Hello, and yes .. it’s simply the fact that I no longer desire or even need (B). Right now, a female friendship would be a chore, extra demands on my time .. and I don’t need that.
(A) will suffice as I see that the friendship is not necessary. I do not desire the added burden of female friendship. I interact with females as necessary to run errands, purchase clothing, buy groceries, have my teeth checked or accept deliveries from Fed-Ex or UPS .. other than that I see no need. Have a great day.

what about getting a massage? would you get female to do it or not risk it? I’d prefer female but don’t want risk of that s~~~ either if she made something up

Skilled Fem-Bot masseuse will do just fine.

[OldBillParticipant]

Replace “friendship” with “acquaintance” and I’m a B tending towards A.

Of course this “ranking” system is just as silly as the “Five Levels of MGTOW” which have been floating around for years.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Age has nothing to do with deciding to go monk or keeping to it.

Of course it does. At the age that I’m now it’s no sacrifice at all. I miss sex to a slight degree but I’m certainly not losing any sleep over it.

In my twenties I couldn’t even imagine giving up sex…

[narwhalParticipant]

I don’t think your options really tell the full picture. I have a couple low level women friends, so perhaps that means I’m B. I also would date, but the chase of that turning into sex or any sort of level where she could get something out of me is very low. Maybe that’s a C.

Putting it another way, A is the lowest risk, but I wouldn’t say that B is necessarily a lower risk then C. I keep both my friendships and dating at a rather shallow level to keep the risks low.

Ok. Then do it.

[Author]

Posts