Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma

Topic by

Home Forums Political Corner Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma

This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 3 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #339785
    +3

    Anonymous
    24

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-31/

    “In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton’s Campaign chair, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.”

    The fix is always in, and the rabbit holes have no endings apparently.

    #339831
    +3
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8283

    So when Donald says the election is rigged, the news pundits should believe him.

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #339896
    +1
    Xenon
    xenon
    Participant
    2007

    Yes they should, but maybe not for the reasons he claims. I called Mr. Sanders defeat in the primary as well as his complete flip flop to backing the democratic ticket. He was merely a way to try and have younger voters back the party line.I am sure the fix will be in place for Hillary and as many fixes as she needs in the future. The democratic convention has done only one thing for me. Insured that I will never vote that ticket again. I think the fixes run much deeper than Mr. Trump is saying. All the way to the top.

    #339902
    +1
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22525

    Director Comey does not understand the bind he has put himself in. This is the worst action Comey could have done in dealing with reopening this investigation.

    Now, everyone is upset with him. The Obama Administration, and the Hillary Campaign are upset with him for reopening the investigation.

    The American people, and the FBI rank and file are upset for appointing this person to oversee the investigation.

    Also, by Comey doing this, he has turned the investigation into a scandal talking point that Trump can use against Clinton. Because anything that comes out of that investigation is now tainted.

    It has come out that Anthony Wiener was going to be the scapegoat to get the Clintons out of this current mess. But, the mess is to big now. And Comey has set himself up as a possible new scapegoat.

    If the Clinton Campaign rigs the election, Comey will be lucky to have a job. If Trump wins the election, Comey will be lucky to stay out of jail. Because after this fiasco, I doubt Obama is going to pardon Comey.

    This is an example of how trying to play both sides from the middle is not a good idea.

    #340044
    +1
    Big Boss
    Big Boss
    Participant
    4496

    Yes they should, but maybe not for the reasons he claims. I called Mr. Sanders defeat in the primary as well as his complete flip flop to backing the democratic ticket. He was merely a way to try and have younger voters back the party line.I am sure the fix will be in place for Hillary and as many fixes as she needs in the future. The democratic convention has done only one thing for me. Insured that I will never vote that ticket again. I think the fixes run much deeper than Mr. Trump is saying. All the way to the top.

    I suspected the fix was in against Bernie before the voting first happened. First was the fact that I had experience with behind the scenes political struggles of parties being a Ron Paul delegate in 08 and 12. I knew Bernie’s people were going to be shut out with the super delegate system that I suspected she consolidated to concede Obama’s victory over her.

    The biggest tell however was that ONLY around 3 democrats ran in a presidential election in which the incumbent party was leaving. Compare it to more than 9 people on the republican party. One was a facade candidate for hillary. Every other democrat potential candidate probably knew where the super delegates were aligned to.

    #340053

    Anonymous
    24

    Yes they should, but maybe not for the reasons he claims. I called Mr. Sanders defeat in the primary as well as his complete flip flop to backing the democratic ticket. He was merely a way to try and have younger voters back the party line.I am sure the fix will be in place for Hillary and as many fixes as she needs in the future. The democratic convention has done only one thing for me. Insured that I will never vote that ticket again. I think the fixes run much deeper than Mr. Trump is saying. All the way to the top.

    Yep, controlled dissent… It is sad when it becomes so obvious and yet so many still back this party. Being a Libertarian, I obviously don’t care much for either of the two ruling parties, but Trump > Clinton hands down, not even a second thought in light of all I know about the Clintons and all of the s~~~ going on that it took to get Hillary to where she is right now. Fascism in disguise is all it is if we are to be honest about it.

    And like Bigboss, I too witnessed the whole Ron Paul debacle, it was the same type of travesty that Sanders suffered, the difference being Paul did not shill for Romney after he got screwed by the establishment, which on both sides does their best to push through candidates that will not enact change once in office.

    Somehow Trump has muscled his way past that establishment resistance though, and that is huge. If he wins will much change? I doubt it, but at least there is a chance, with Hillary, no chance.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.