Gentlemen
How did I find myself here on MGTOW.com? A happy accident, I guess.
You see until yesterday I had no idea what MGTOW or Red Pill was and clueless about “game” too. However, here on extended vacation in Thailand I had noticed the high number of young women sporting tattoos. I’m not talking about a little unicorn on the ankle here, I’m talking ugly black ink monstrosities covering the whole arm or back. Gross! I decided to try to understand the phenomenon so googled it. ( I’ll write another post on this topic later ) One of the results was posted on “Return of Kings”. That was my first taste of the red pill, but in truth it was a familiar taste, it had been on my lips for some time, red pill just gave it a name.
So I read more, and more and more, until I found an article entitled “Why “Men Going Their Own Way” Is No Way For Men To Go” The article stated that MGTOW were a bunch of sad internet nerd losers, 40 year old virgins forced into MGTOW by a lifetime of rejection by women. It didn’t sound so attractive so why did I decide to investigate further? Well, it had struck me that red pill has at its heart a fundamental paradox, that is to say that for all its talk of asserting masculine values and the quest to achieve Alpha status red pill is actually about pleasing women, giving women what they actually want instead of what they tell us they want. Red pill is just as much a system of female control as blue pill. So the only true way to express ones masculinity, if you truly and sincerely don’t give a flying f~~~ about what women think, want, need or crave is MGTOW.
I am not a misogynist, I am not a homosexual, I have had my share of women and was married once ( and yes, I divorced her ). I am a feminist in that I believe men and women should be treated equally under the law, unfortunately in too many instances the law has swung in favour of women. I do not believe women are evil, although some do evil things. I have had my share of knocks but then again I have given as good as I got.
It’s just that women bore me and I have come to a juncture in my life when I no longer feel the need to carry the excess baggage a woman represents any longer. I have always been “other”. I have always seen through and rejected blue pill BS. I have always traveled my own path, its just that in the past women have been welcome to come along for the ride. Now they are not.
Thank you.
“I am a feminist in that I believe men and women should be treated equally under the law, unfortunately in too many instances the law has swung in favour of women.”
If you believe men and women should be treated equally under the law you’re an anti-feminist egalitarian, because feminists are actually asking for (and more and more often, obtaining) gendered laws and policies – just some little examples:
* Duluth Model and Convention of Istanbul (men are always perpetrators, women are always victims, whe it comes at domestic violence – Convention of Istanbul even explicitly allows discrimination against men)
* Brazilian law about femicide (men who harm their female partners are sentenced more than women who harm their male partner – inequality sanctioned by the law)
* Canadian policy about refugees: single heterosexual males are rejected – discrimination on the basis of sex and sexual orientation and marital status.
* Divorce laws – no need frther words.
* Cohabitation laws – no need further words.
* Tampon tax – reduced taxes for tampons for women but NOT for diapers for children and for incontinent people – this is not just only discrimination based on sex but also based on age (since 50% children and incontinent people are females).
* Yes-means-yes laws, outlawing most heterosexual acts and destroying due process (because the accused have to prove HE obtained consent).
* New UK law about coercion within domestic abuse: using male pronouns instead of gender-neutral pronouns – VERY telling.
* Swedish model about sex work (applied even in Canada): it criminalize the buyer but not the seller, even worse, even if it’s gender-neutral worded it’s applied just only against men, not against the very few women who pays gigolos – the version adopeted by Norway it’s even more sexist: it punishes men who buy sex abroad but it doesn’t apply against the many women in their 50s who practice female sexual tourism in places like Ceylon, Kenya, Jamaica, because those “fake relationships” lasting a week and paid through gifts are considered “relationships”.
I consider MGTOW a very egalitarian movement, not by itself, but considering the wider context of our society and the likely outcomes of MGTOW:
* MGTOW totally destroys the traditional idea of male gender role “protector and provider” – MGTOW is FAR more efficient than everything else at destroying the traditional idea of male gender role “protector and provider” because it’s a new way that suits men due is the result of men’s thought and men’s instincts (I believe most men are natural-born MGTOWs and our society suppress their instinct).
* There are plenty, and more and more, “women-only spaces”, and spaces reserved to men are almost extinct. This is a “men-only space”. Substantive equality.
* It takes away the main advantage women always had on men: soft power through pussy power. MGTOW levels the playfield.
* It takes away the new advantage women have on men: the chance to destroy a man with a divorce or a false accusation of domestic violence. Again, MGTOW levels the playfield.
* MGTOW will be good for worthy women, too, on the long run: not relying on men will encourage women to grow up – most them are unwillingly to do it. It doesn’t matter, since MGTOW is growing more and more, women will have to count just only on themselves, more and more. At the end of the process we are starting, and that will take at least two generations, women will be better off, as adult human beings instead of eternal victims. The price to pay will be high for both sides, but I guess will be higher for women, because being MGTOW keep men out of most s~~~ that is going to happen (when more gendered polcies will be implemented you’ll see: I’m pretty sure that at a certain point the 4th feminist wave will even go straight towards a reduction of the percentage of males through designer babies, and there will be manginas supporting them in hope that will raise the value of men).
I said it as someone who took a Gender Studies course (a course, not a degree – my degree is History) in Lund, Sweden.
I know all the flaws and the lies within the feminist theory, and I know feminist theory much better than at least 95% of self-professed feminists.
Welcome.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Eric Lauder 4 years ago.
