Playing Their Game Against Them

Topic by FunInTheSun

FunInTheSun

Home Forums Blue Pill Hell Playing Their Game Against Them

Tagged: 

This topic contains 10 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Trailboss  Trailboss 2 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #688627
    +8
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8283

    If you hear women make rude remarks about men:

    “You’re anti-male.”

    If a woman hits you:

    “You touched me inappropriately. I feel violated. I’m calling security.”

    During your divorce hearing:

    “Your Honor, I was accustomed to a certain lifestyle when I was married to her, and now she’s taking those benefits away from me. I want financial compensation.”

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #688634
    +10
    RealityBites
    RealityBites
    Participant
    2198

    I just tell them…”Thanks but no thanks; I am saving myself for a woman who will have the means to support me in the lifestyle that I deserve…”

    and I walk away….

    #688635
    +14

    Anonymous
    12

    MGTOW is passive resistance. Gandhi got rid of the English via passive resistance. We don’t have to engage the enemy directly. In fact we win by disengaging. That goes for arguing with Leftard’s as well or anyone really.

    Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals. Personal goals I mean not MGTOW as a group.

    Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.

    Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.

    #688652
    +2
    ForeverDone
    ForeverDone
    Participant
    2928

    If you hear women make rude remarks about men:

    “You’re anti-male.”

    If a woman hits you:

    “You touched me inappropriately. I feel violated. I’m calling security.”

    During your divorce hearing:

    “Your Honor, I was accustomed to a certain lifestyle when I was married to her, and now she’s taking those benefits away from me. I want financial compensation.”

    Good luck with that. You’d get the court room laughing though. 🙂

    #688658
    +1
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals. Personal goals I mean not MGTOW as a group.

    Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.

    Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.

    Good call, Morlock.

    #688669
    +1
    Old Buck
    Old Buck
    Participant
    3596

    Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.

    Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.

    Well said, Morlock.

    First step in avoiding a trap is to know of its existence.

    Don't chase tail. Turn yours around, walk away, and live free!

    #688680
    +1
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    War it is.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #688718
    +3

    ”Thanks but no thanks; I am saving myself for a woman who will have the means to support me in the lifestyle that I deserve…”

    Glorious. I can just imagine the looks on their faces. Hell, I’m gonna try this one.

    Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

    #688733
    +2
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8283

    Good luck with that. You’d get the court room laughing though

    That’s fine. If that kind of financial restitution is ridiculous, then no one should be subject to it. I rest my case.

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #688780
    +2
    Sjt1975
    sjt1975
    Participant
    2536

    MGTOW is passive resistance. We don’t have to engage the enemy directly. In fact, we win by disengaging. That goes for arguing with Leftard’s as well or anyone really. Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals; personal goals, I mean.

    Avoid the courts by not marrying/co-habiting. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.

    Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.

    Amen to this. Morlock is spot-on. Just dis-engage from women and gynco-centric organisations/systems. The system and women both need to be starved, otherwise they will just continue and get worse.

    #688993
    +1
    Trailboss
    Trailboss
    Participant
    1844

    Living well is the best revenge…..Live well, my Brothers! #MANOUT!

    An educated, armed populace cannot be enslaved.

    #690581
    IMickey503
    iMickey503
    Participant
    12465

    This sort of fits the narative.. Na, its just funny..

    This thread inspired me to look up:

    ” Should we pray for the Devil? ”

    The overall first 2 Google search results made the argument via biblical references of the various scriptures points to the answers being no.

    Well.. I just got this from the INTERNET..... :-)

    My feeling, is that it “Feels” wrong not to do so.
    It seems wrong to not give anyone like the devil or fallen angels sympathy and therefore prayers with hopes that they can be saved.

    But I think the response to the question (that honestly seems to be posed from the same person or Webmaster on all the sites 🙂 points out that the Devil can not be changed, and neither can any of the fallen angels.

    Not big on the bible, or religion. However, the question on analysis explains much more about the situation us lads are knee deep in then meets the eye.

    These post stands out to that reasoning:

    Old F~~~ Says: ITZ A TRAP!!!

    TurboNintendoPOWER Says: Systemz needs to Starvz

    Under any other situation, or circumstance that requires action, if men saw a problem they would go out and fix it. It would be close to unanimous.

    Women are the only “issue” that with consistency, lead to a Black Hole that no matter what you throw in gets sucked, consumed, and spat out over and over again.

    The VERY notion that a woman gives your life substance must have been thought up with the word incorporeal in mind. Women somehow define any and all logic.

    Yet we somehow keep feeding the fire, and getting burned then are outraged when this happens? Yet many of us repeat the very same actions that we disparage others to do so.
    lies to tell the truth? Hmmm..

    Again. I bring up a male Human empathetic argument- that even the devil should be forgiven. But if god in his wisdom refuses to do so in his own accounts in the bible? This must mean something.

    So then it lead me to this study on Empathy, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published in 1995. The research study was lead by C. Daniel Batson. (No idea what the “C” stands for. Maybe he had Aussie parents? )

    The light switched on after 2 days of having this thread up:

    Then, everyone heard the same interview, which was from a (not real) “very brave, bright 10-year-old” named Sheri Summers. Her painful illness was explained in detail, and after they heard about it the subjects were asked whether they would move Sheri up the wait list, past the other terminally ill kids who were viewed as higher priority, who would have to wait longer to enjoy the Quality Life Foundation’s offerings as a result. “The effect was strong,” writes the Yale University psychologist Paul Bloom, describing the experiment in his new book Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. “Three-quarters of the subjects in the high-empathy condition wanted to move her up, as compared to one-third in the low-empathy condition. Empathy’s effects, then, weren’t in the direction of increasing an interest in justice. Rather, they increased special concern for the target of the empathy, despite the cost to others.”

    -Paul Bloom from his many books such as mastery of Male Orgasam and Sex is for F~~s,
    Empathy. That s~~~ is Dank yo!+

    You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.