Home › Forums › Blue Pill Hell › Playing Their Game Against Them
Tagged: IDGAF
This topic contains 10 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by
Trailboss 2 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
If you hear women make rude remarks about men:
“You’re anti-male.”
If a woman hits you:
“You touched me inappropriately. I feel violated. I’m calling security.”
During your divorce hearing:
“Your Honor, I was accustomed to a certain lifestyle when I was married to her, and now she’s taking those benefits away from me. I want financial compensation.”
"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)
I just tell them…”Thanks but no thanks; I am saving myself for a woman who will have the means to support me in the lifestyle that I deserve…”
and I walk away….

Anonymous12MGTOW is passive resistance. Gandhi got rid of the English via passive resistance. We don’t have to engage the enemy directly. In fact we win by disengaging. That goes for arguing with Leftard’s as well or anyone really.
Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals. Personal goals I mean not MGTOW as a group.
Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.
Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.
If you hear women make rude remarks about men:
“You’re anti-male.”
If a woman hits you:
“You touched me inappropriately. I feel violated. I’m calling security.”
During your divorce hearing:
“Your Honor, I was accustomed to a certain lifestyle when I was married to her, and now she’s taking those benefits away from me. I want financial compensation.”
Good luck with that. You’d get the court room laughing though. 🙂
Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals. Personal goals I mean not MGTOW as a group.
Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.
Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.
Good call, Morlock.
Avoid the courts by not marrying or co-habitation. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.
Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.
Well said, Morlock.
First step in avoiding a trap is to know of its existence.
Don't chase tail. Turn yours around, walk away, and live free!
War it is.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
”Thanks but no thanks; I am saving myself for a woman who will have the means to support me in the lifestyle that I deserve…”
Glorious. I can just imagine the looks on their faces. Hell, I’m gonna try this one.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
Good luck with that. You’d get the court room laughing though
That’s fine. If that kind of financial restitution is ridiculous, then no one should be subject to it. I rest my case.
"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)
MGTOW is passive resistance. We don’t have to engage the enemy directly. In fact, we win by disengaging. That goes for arguing with Leftard’s as well or anyone really. Engaging the enemy just distracts us from our true purpose and goals; personal goals, I mean.
Avoid the courts by not marrying/co-habiting. Avoid the harassment suits by not engaging with women at all. Don’t date.
Just don’t do it and focus on what makes you happy what you want from life. We win by being happy.
Amen to this. Morlock is spot-on. Just dis-engage from women and gynco-centric organisations/systems. The system and women both need to be starved, otherwise they will just continue and get worse.
Living well is the best revenge…..Live well, my Brothers! #MANOUT!
An educated, armed populace cannot be enslaved.

This thread inspired me to look up:
” Should we pray for the Devil? ”
The overall first 2 Google search results made the argument via biblical references of the various scriptures points to the answers being no.

My feeling, is that it “Feels” wrong not to do so.
It seems wrong to not give anyone like the devil or fallen angels sympathy and therefore prayers with hopes that they can be saved.But I think the response to the question (that honestly seems to be posed from the same person or Webmaster on all the sites 🙂 points out that the Devil can not be changed, and neither can any of the fallen angels.
Not big on the bible, or religion. However, the question on analysis explains much more about the situation us lads are knee deep in then meets the eye.
These post stands out to that reasoning:


Under any other situation, or circumstance that requires action, if men saw a problem they would go out and fix it. It would be close to unanimous.
Women are the only “issue” that with consistency, lead to a Black Hole that no matter what you throw in gets sucked, consumed, and spat out over and over again.
The VERY notion that a woman gives your life substance must have been thought up with the word incorporeal in mind. Women somehow define any and all logic.
Yet we somehow keep feeding the fire, and getting burned then are outraged when this happens? Yet many of us repeat the very same actions that we disparage others to do so.

Again. I bring up a male Human empathetic argument- that even the devil should be forgiven. But if god in his wisdom refuses to do so in his own accounts in the bible? This must mean something.
So then it lead me to this study on Empathy, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published in 1995. The research study was lead by C. Daniel Batson. (No idea what the “C” stands for. Maybe he had Aussie parents? )
The light switched on after 2 days of having this thread up:
Then, everyone heard the same interview, which was from a (not real) “very brave, bright 10-year-old” named Sheri Summers. Her painful illness was explained in detail, and after they heard about it the subjects were asked whether they would move Sheri up the wait list, past the other terminally ill kids who were viewed as higher priority, who would have to wait longer to enjoy the Quality Life Foundation’s offerings as a result. “The effect was strong,” writes the Yale University psychologist Paul Bloom, describing the experiment in his new book Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. “Three-quarters of the subjects in the high-empathy condition wanted to move her up, as compared to one-third in the low-empathy condition. Empathy’s effects, then, weren’t in the direction of increasing an interest in justice. Rather, they increased special concern for the target of the empathy, despite the cost to others.”
-Paul Bloom from his many books such as mastery of Male Orgasam and Sex is for F~~s,
+You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
