Pathologizing Masculinity Is About Disarming Americans

[LurchParticipant 3866]

If masculinity is declared a mental illness, then I’m buying shares in PVC pipe manufactures. Since there is going to be an explosion in demand for PVC pipes and end caps, when men start burying their guns in their backyards before the feminazi gestapo turns up, enacts their “Red Flag” laws and takes the guns away.

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

In Russia, homicide rate is the three times higher. People kill each other simply with kitchen knifes (the local weapon of choice).
At the moment when three dozen Americans get killed at the same place due to shooting, ninety Russians get killed in different places without firearms used against them!
Use it in your public argues. The USA simply needs to tighten gun control.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

The irony is that feminism is the mental illness. It didn’t arise from evolutionary preferences, but simply a sick society in its last stages…

Hard times create strong men.
Strong men create good times.
Good times create weak men.
Weak men create hard times.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

This goes way beyond disarming and banning masculinity. Those behind this are beyond the standard control-freak psychopath. Such psychopaths welcome masculinity and femininity in the general public because he or she finds it easier to mimic members of the crowd when there are clearly define roles.

No. This is by a group that is so shallow, so thin-skinned, so slavishly devoted to group-think that they shun all outside consideration. This is by a group that like a fish tale gone horribly wrong, each generation of their group lies about how outsiders seek to destroy them, with the false accusations against outsiders growing more and more grim with each retelling, all so those of the group stay loyal to the group, with this reaching the point the group seeks a level beyond complete obedience in enslaving the rest of humanity. An impossible standard where even a hint, or sign of disagree, or even a misspoken word is considered a life-or-death threat to the group that must be immediately destroy. Even an acknowledgement or compliment by an outsider is seen as a threat to be destroyed. And even if the outsides are completely loyal to the group, the group will still consider the outsiders a threat for if the outsiders are allowed to live they may have children whom will threaten the group, so the group destroys even the loyal outsiders before the next generation of outsiders is created.

To this end, members of of this group always view themselves as right and view themselves as always the victim in any situation. They always have an excuse and they refuse to take responsibility for their actions. To this end, if an outsider even points out how a member of this group is wrong, the member of the group will immediately consider himself or herself to be the victim and that he or she must the destroy the outsider for a mere disagreement for fear the outsider may someday decide to destroy the group because of mere disagreement.

When encountering a group whose members consider themselves always right and always the victim, there is no constructive way to deal with such a group. But, MGTOW found a solution. That solution is to walk away and ignore such groups.

It is hard to justify victim ideology from people whom ignore the people claiming to be the victim. It is baseless to claim that to ignore someone is to be a threat to that someone.

And by ignoring the group, none of the tactics by

Minimalism and ghosting solve countering the societal pressures by the group to instigate a confrontation, leaving the group with no real tactics that would not be overt and against their clandestine believes.

And by forcing the group into not being able to do anything, the group is forced to have their one tactics of identity politics turn inward and damage the group, while on the edges of the group, members are being red-pilled and see how they have been slaves to the group for so long.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22543]

Lurch wrote:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rIU0uuw2fqA?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
If masculinity is declared a mental illness, then I’m buying shares in PVC pipe manufactures. Since there is going to be an explosion in demand for PVC pipes and end caps, when men start burying their guns in their backyards before the feminazi gestapo turns up, enacts their “Red Flag” laws and takes the guns away.

Not Americans.

American MEN.

They dont care if women carry, they want them to carry and shoot more men.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[SkelatorParticipant 1261]

Yeah giving women firearms is really gonna solve problems. Women are so hot tempered they can’t control themselves, just imagine that being strapped 24/7. They will be shooting each other over parking spots and coupons.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22543]

Skelator wrote:

Yeah giving women firearms is really gonna solve problems. Women are so hot tempered they can’t control themselves, just imagine that being strapped 24/7. They will be shooting each other over parking spots and coupons.

All you need to know is look at women cops. they pull their guns more often because they are weaker and intimidated more than men. They have more oopsie fire accidents, like shooting their gun while other officers are cuffing s guy on the ground. They shoot homeless men for saying something back to them. They go to their apartment complex and break into the wrong apartment thinking its theirs even though its on a different floor, and shoot and murder the guy who is having his apartment broken into by her.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[JB BooksParticipant 3182]

If the feminazis got their way, one of the first things they’d do is shred the Constitution. Then, after the system inevitably began to fail, the right would take over without any Constitutional restrictions. At that point, the liberals would pay – Big Time.

We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Good. I can’t wait till its open season. What are they going to do when real criminals get on the stage? The cops are worthless. THey go play hide and go f~~~ yourself when their is real danger. And hell, the Public that knows is already armed to the teeth.

You want to know why I Like these laws? It gives the Enforcement a false sense of security. Just wait till they come after the WRONG PERSON.

Its going to be like HELL ON EARTH. THey are not going to use guns. Its going to be MUCH WORSE.

I REALLY enjoy watching the spectacle unfold. Right now, crime in Calicuckistan is starting to reach new heights. People are just taking out officers one by one. More cops are getting ambushed each and every day. Like it or not, the Criminals are winning. And they are doing a great job! So screw it! Many of them got a bone to pick. And no one is giving a s~~~. The Politicians are SAFE at home where they belong. And they just keep making it worse. I’m glad.

Best part is? THey keep HIRING the same criminals they are trying to prevent. Love it.

I hope that they have a MAJOR disaster coming up. And they get it on film where men who are armed just walk away. And all the while CHeering on this sort of thing.

All those permits only make it so that they KNOW you have a firearm. What if its something else? Something that will take out a spread of 100 in an area? What happens then?

Like it or not, GAS can subdue multiple people. And then its free day at the Good WILL!

The MORE they push. THE MORE ITS GETS WORSE!

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[narwhalParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

This goes way beyond disarming and banning masculinity. Those behind this are beyond the standard control-freak psychopath. Such psychopaths welcome masculinity and femininity in the general public because he or she finds it easier to mimic members of the crowd when there are clearly define roles.

Kind of off topic, but this got me thinking about feminism for a slightly different point of view. Feminism originally started because women want to break away from their defined roles and take on new roles. Essentially, they wanted to take on more masculine roles. Those roles primarily being centered around bringing in income (not necessarily working), taking leadership roles, and experiencing past times/hobbies that were generally thought of (reserved for) men.

So given that, it seems odd that feminism is now trying to ban masculinity (or more accurately aspect of masculinity), the very thing they used to want to become. It might be better to say that feminism has adopted all the masculinity that they can, and now want to eliminate that which they can not assimilate. Better still, it’s not about eliminating, so much as it is about control. They don’t want all masculinity they can’t assimilate to be gone entirely, they just want it tamed and available at their command.

Take a different angle, what if there was a parallel philosophy (or whatever) called masculinism. That would be about men who want to break away from their traditionally defined roles and take on new roles. First off, women would shame the hell out of any man who wanted to live his life within traditionally defined female roles. Men would too, at least if the man was adopting all female roles. The reality is that men do take on female roles. Men will cook and clean and take care of children and all these things. They don’t try and be feminine while doing it though, they just do them and do they well. They don’t look to change what the feminine roles are, look for a pass to do take on these roles with lower expectations, they just do. There is no need for masculinism because men do not need to have the rules changed to favor them, or someone get out of the way in order for them to achieve whatever it is they want to achieve. Men don’t want to be treated special for being a man in a woman’s role, they only want to do the job well. They also do not expect a pass on performing traditional male roles just because they are also doing something traditionally female. Can you imagine a male teacher complaining that his wife won’t help out and mow the lawn?

I get that femimisn had a really purpose at a point in time, in that society prevented women from doing what they could do. But it’s also telling that it has never gone away, and that there has never been a need for masculinism.

Ok. Then do it.

[Author]

Posts