Partner Violence PV

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

This is an interesting, albiet very long article.

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf

It contains 7 methods of feminist and scientific bias with an 8th method added at the end.
Method 1. Suppress Evidence
Method 2. Avoid Obtaining Data Inconsistent with the Patriarchal Dominance Theory
Method 3. Cite Only Studies That Show Male Perpetration
Method 4. Conclude That Results Support Feminist Beliefs When They Do Not
Method 5. Create “Evidence” by Citation
Method 6. Obstrnct Publication of Articles and Obstruct Funding Research That Might
Contradict the Idea that Male Dominance Is the Cause of PV
Method 7. Harass, Threalen, and Penalize Researchers Who Produce Evidence
That Contradicts Feminist Beliefs
Method 8: Playing with numbers

“”Suzanne Steinmetz made the mistake of publishing a book and articles (Steinmetz 1977,
1977-1978) which clearly showed about equal rates of perpetration by males and females.
Anger over this resulted in a bomb threat at her daughters’ wedding, and she was the object
of a letter writing campaign to deny her promotion and tenure at the University of
Delaware.””

“”The seven methods described above have created a climate of fear that has inhibited
research and publication on gender symmetry in PV and largely explain why an ideology
and treatment modality has persisted for 30 years.””

CDC Study: More Men than Women Victims of Partner Abuse

http://www.saveservices.org/2012/02/cdc-study-more-men-than-women-victims-of-partner-abuse/

This is interesting in part because it highlights how little help there is for male victims.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Keymaster,

That study needs to be archived.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

@Beastieboy666 the top link provided should have had a lot more articles but I see/read
only some information. I know it because I read it a few years ago and there is a lot missing.
Good find though.

This sort of information I fear will be deliberately erased if not saved in paper form or other means and
away from the websites where we currently can find it.
I have noticed that many studies and official Government data and statistics are starting to be harder to
find and with so many women working in those fields it’s not too hard to imagine that they being pro female
would destroy it. Modern version of book burning.

As JS suggests it should be archived.

Zero Tolerance

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

Dr. Sable wrote:

@Beastieboy666 the top link provided should have had a lot more articles but I see/read
only some information. I know it because I read it a few years ago and there is a lot missing.
Good find though.

You’r not kidding DS. The article starts on page 227 in the PDF. That’s a lot of missing pages that I haven’t been able to find so far. I also have no idea of the content or whether there are more pages after page 232.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[SlingshotParticipant 171]

There were a load of reference links at the bottom of the MenWeb site

National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey

[Author]

Posts