Oxygen says MGTOW #6 most dangerous anti-feminist sites

[Anonymous 11]

My dad bought me an acetylene cannon when I was a boy. It was my favorite toy.

Hydrogen was the most dangerous one I’ve ever handled. Even something inert like Nitrogen will shoot through cinder block walls just from the valve stem breaking off the tank.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

So we’re dangerous for not providing gene pool polluters (femtards) with free s~~~?

[RhettParticipant 637]

John Doe wrote:

Hitman wrote:

We’re dangerous? More like we’re protecting ourselves

Being a living male, will eventually be outlawed.

This would be funny if it wasn’t true

Single guys come home, look at what’s in the fridge, and go to bed. Married guys come home, look at what’s in bed, and go to the fridge.......But the best representative of MGTOW is…………… an empty chair,.

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

Even something inert like Nitrogen will shoot through cinder block walls just from the valve stem breaking off the tank.

My tanks are always kept chained in an upright position (it’s the law), even during transport they must be kept upright in case the valve sheers off, a flair up is much safer than a projectile compressed to 2000+ psi. A flair up will blast off all the ceiling tiles and knock down the florescent lighting, a projectile bottle will go through a man.

[AttonParticipant]

Funny thing is MGTOW has never been anti woman. It’s just been pro male which when you think about it to these retards is anti woman. I also find it rather funny they lump us in with conservatives the same people who support alimony.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Cap285Participant 6007]

1. I’ve seen that video. But I never know if they’re serious or joking because women aren’t funny .

2. ? That Kate thing again!

Why Keymaster, why??!

Fuck this planet.

[Anonymous 2]

Wow that whole text is dripping with misinformative bulls~~~. Not just on MGTOW, the entire piece is utter garbage.

[Anonymous 1]

Are they actually listed in any particular order? The article doesn’t suggest they are.

[CatsPawParticipant 423]

Of course MGTOW is dangerous, its teaching Men to think with their heads and not their dicks.
Its as dangerous as antibiotics to bacteria, but that does not mean we want the bacteria in the body.

To be honest, Feminism does more damage to women and itself with every move it makes. Its not like MGTOW needs to do anything about it.
Like a krogan warlord once said: I will inflict upon feminism the greatest insult an enemy can suffer: to be ignored. (Well not exactly but you get the point).

[shovelheadriderParticipant 2400]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

main stream Oxygen

that says were our country is if oxy is main stream.
Migtow is freeing their slaves.These are special slaves.Men slave pay for enslavement.Build house for them to live in. The many myths women have have perpetrated on men.Woman smell good? Take away man made extracts they smell like tuna.Read old testament.The sisters got rank for certain days back at the Oasis .
They look beautiful pregnant etc.Enter your myth here.Women do not want the truth about them out.Other women will tell you about how women are you bet they are p~~~ed after the pr about women put out.

[EskimospyParticipant 841]

Ok, I’ve read this mangina’s paragraph about MGTOW, describing what it is to the best of his knowledge but he never mentions why it’s so dangerous.
He also refers to the cost/benefit analysis as our “reason” for being MGTOW. So he simply dismisses it by referring to it as merely a so called reason as if the argument was fundamentally flawed, but doesn’t make a single attempt to form any argument against it, just dismisses it outright. I guess he can, if he ever learns go learn about the cost/benefit analysis the hard way.

[Anonymous 2]

Eskimospy wrote:

Ok, I’ve read this mangina’s paragraph about MGTOW, describing what it is to the best of his knowledge but he never mentions why it’s so dangerous.
He also refers to the cost/benefit analysis as our “reason” for being MGTOW. So he simply dismisses it by referring to it as merely a so called reason as if the argument was fundamentally flawed, but doesn’t make a single attempt to form any argument against it, just dismisses it outright. I guess he can, if he ever learns go learn about the cost/benefit analysis the hard way.

He doesn’t mention why it’s so dangerous or try to argue against the MGTOW stance of cost/benefit analysis for two reasons.

1. It’s not dangerous (unless you are pro-gynocentrism, which these people will obviously not admit to outright), and trying to give any reason why it is dangerous is going to sound idiotic. It would require him to outright say “MGTOW is dangerous because its stance is anti-gynocentrism. It does not follow the pro-female, anti-male script of feminism, and tells men not to take part in a system that is rigged against them.”

2. The cost/benefit analysis of MGTOW is spot-on, so trying to argue against it is, again, idiotic. What kind of evidence is he going to give that divorce courts and family courts are not gynocentric? Obviously, all the evidence shows that those courts are insanely gynocentric, and if he can’t use facts to back up his argument, then his only option is to outright dismiss it without providing evidence and hope the reader takes his word for it.

Unless you are simply pro-gynocentrism and want to see gynocentrism stay alive, then there is no valid argument against men refusing to take part in a gynocentric system. Of course, anybody who is pro-gynocentrism is highly unlikely to come out and say it, so their only resort is to completely dismiss the MGTOW stance without providing any evidence as to why the MGTOW stance lacks any credibility, because the truth is that it’s their own argument that lacks credibility.

[Anonymous 5]

I makes me wonder if they even bother to look into our “meanings” or if you will “independent choices”. (for the words I think I can use.. respectfully – to be honest am still to heart feel mgtow is beyond just a “site”. What I have learned here.. it dosent matter if they close this site down- once you know. Your sheilds are up and you know you can finally be happy.”

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Anonymous wrote:

it doesn’t matter if they close this site down

Sites like this (MGTOW) are Hydras. Kill one head, three more grow back.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Masculine_ManParticipant 2735]

Like a beta-cuck, he is trying to impress his slave owners so maybe one day he may be rewarded with sex. He will eventually learn the hard way. Continue to dismiss these claims and live your life for you. Spend your money for you. Buy stuff that makes you and ONLY you happy.

If it costs you your peace of mind, then it is too expensive.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

This guy makes a list of dangerous anti-feminist groups, and on the list is mgtow, gamergate and a few others I have never even heard of. He accuses all on his list of being guilty of various levels of violence against women.

Mgtow is #6. Gamergate (whatever the hell that is) is #1 on his list.

Let me open up a can of reality and sprinkle a little on this article… just to see how it holds up.

Radical Islam openly practices female genital mutilation, views and treats women as property at best and slave-commodities at worst, denies women the option to vote, drive a car, hold political power, choose their own wardrobe, sign legal contracts, sentences them to death by stoning for having sex before marriage… etc etc etc. If radical Islam represents 1% of that 1.5 billion member religion, then there are about 15 million people roaming the planet who believe that it is their sacred duty to God to practice all of the above, and to impose it on every part of the world. They are unconstrained by national borders, and they are willing to die, if necessary, to advance these goals. While he mentioned in his article that bomb threats were one of the things that some on this list have engaged in to disrupt feminist events, he failed to mention that when rad’ islam makes a threat, it’s pretty likely to be a real bomb.

That’s what a real war on women looks like.

And that didn’t even make his list.

As for mgtow: It’s difficult to defend the position that a man is dangerous when he isn’t even present. And when a man goes his own way, GOES is the operative word. The past tense of that word is: GONE. Any threat he might have been… is GONE with him.

As others have already pointed out, ideas are dangerous. They spread quickly, are difficult to detect and difficult to stamp out. The danger of mgtow for feminism is the idea of it. The idea of men GONE. Carpenters that house them, farmers that feed them, cops and soldiers that protect them, boyfriends and husbands (and ex-husbands) that do all of these things…

All GONE.

For every man who accepts and practices the idea of mgtow, there is somewhere a woman whose options come down to just two choices: 1: get off the sofa, take the responsibility and assume the risk and effort necessary to provide for your own immediate survival, or 2: Starve shivering in the dark.

The real danger to feminism is the spread of the idea that men have another option besides being the disposable provider of all that a woman requires to survive. Because while it’s easy for feminism to sell the idea that men are disposable, the back up plan for no more men is too terrifying to them to even mention.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Men discovering a place where they can find some peace of mind and support…. dangerous?

Early feminism was a place for women who were genuinely abused…were they so ‘dangerous’ to men at that time?

No.

The
major difference between true feminism and the manosphere is that feminists got listened to in their times of need…..while we are getting laughed and hated for it.

No, the very few verbal outbursts in youtube and the minute level of mgtow trolls (that could be perfectly managed by internet police) does not count as propagation of violence.

But I don’t need to play their games and prove that I’m not bad.

We’ll see in ten years from now… how many dangers and destruction mgtow will avert from the lives of men. We’ll see how many lives mgtow will save. I’ll leave that to the scholars of the future.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[EtrangereParticipant 706]

I don’t even know what the f~~~ that means….gender binary. Someone wake me up when the real world comes back.

[Anonymous 18]

Etrangere wrote:

I don’t even know what the f~~~ that means….gender binary.

0’s and 1’s. You stick 1 in to a 0. 1 being a penis. 0 being a vagina.

Any deviation of the binary includes confused sexes with purple or red hair and with cannon holes in their ears with tetanus-laden metal works obtained from the junkyard hanging from their earlobes.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Hitman wrote:

What do men do when they feel so defeated by feminism

We wouldn’t know, It’s never happened.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Author]

Posts