Home › Forums › Philosophy › Ontological Argument Against Conformity
Tagged: freedom
This topic contains 24 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by
NoMore 1 year, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts

Anonymous38Exactly Morlock. Wisdom simplifies. I don’t trust obfuscation.
OP, what’s your central thesis then?
Oftentimes, at martial arts dojos, someone’s off to the side, doing a lot of arm curls.
Oftentimes, at free weight gyms, someone’s off to the side, practicing a martial arts movement.
Usually it may be best to ignore them in that respectively, when among other lifters, their arms are relatively weak. Or, among martial artists, their form and execution…lacking.Inferior and not wanting to improve or superior and wanting to show off have always been hallmarks of a true champion?
Wisdom vs. Smerts
Tuna.
"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

Anonymous38Truth seekers seek to simplify. Trouble makers to obfuscate.
SJWs abhor simple arguments because they cannot risk offending, using a generalisation and it also leaves their ‘argument’ very easy to pick apart. So they obfuscate. That way they can always claim you missed their point.
If I have to roll my scroll wheel more than two or three times to read a post, it’s just not worth it.
However, I confess fault that after reading the title of the thread, I still clicked. My curiosity controlled me.
The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.
This is truly a thesis. It reads like one and will probably pass muster. This isn’t a dig at you, as I’ve had to write many a verbose verbiage volumes to make the grade.
In fact, I would point out that your linguistic style and verbosity are an example of the Crystal Palace. The social construct of philosophical discussion expects certain vagueries, obfuscations, and baroque-ness.
My thesis on an Ontological Argument Against Conformity would be a brief,
“Because f~~~ you, that’s why.”
No sources or citations. Just let them mull that over in their heads.
A co-worker recently told me, "If you want to see who someone really is, divorce them." I have found out how true this is. When your wife drops the façade of being the caring partner, you will witness all of the greed, hate, and spite that she has masked. It is truly breathtaking!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
