One woman ALREADY Imagining Sexbots Replacing MEN

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22521]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Have fun guys, the feminazis are getting out of mind for that

Since the time of slave-owning societies, a powerful misogynistic myth has led men to believe they originate and can exist outside of relations with woman. This myth is perpetuated in the Judaea-Christian-Islamic traditions of the monotheist God, who created the universe and man with no female participation. In these myths, Eve was born of Adam’s rib.

Enter the age of robots and AI, where mortal men reenact the fantasy of God and appoint themselves as the creators of a new life force. Through the fantasy of sex robots in the form of women, they believe that can exist without woman, and that her existence is incidental to his.

This egocentric misogynistic myth is reproduced over and over again, in the Enlightenment as the Libertine, the symbol of the free individual who inspired the cult of pornographic sadism. This patriarchial myth was turned again in the 20th century by Ayn Rand’s “Objectivism”. Rand attacked the concept and practice of altruism and interdependence with others. Rand’s theory of objectivism proposed that “man is an end in himself,” that his own happiness is, can, and must be met regardless of others.

Sex robots offer men a new way to engage in the fantasy of female annihilation and imagine they can use robots and AI to turn men into ends in themselves. But this myth is born from a distortion of the Real and if left unchallenged will result in the end of humanity.

TRANSLATION:

“OH MY GOD! I’M GOING TO LOSE ALL MY FEMALE PRIVILEGES! NO MORE PEDESTAL! NO MORE CHIVALRY! NO MORE PUSSY PASS!
BLUE PILLED CUCKS MUST BAN THIS DISGRACE!
IT’S SO UNFFFAAAAAIIIIRRRR!!!!!!”

Source -FEMINAZI CAMPAIGN AGAINST SEX ROBOTS:
“Man as an end in himself” – the Libertine, the culture of sadism, porn and sex robots – keynote lecture

Since these are the women wh have proclaimed decades ago they need no men, that they like seeing men die, that they are not concerned about women lying about false rape and destroying innocent mens lives, and that plenty of them actively hate men and want nothing to do with us, sexbots are actually the safest option for men versus modern feminist women. And basically all women.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22521]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Monk wrote:

From article: … and will result in the end of humanity.

DoublePlusGood.

There’s a chance it could actually result in the end of women: trials for artificial womb for human use are expected to begin in 2021 – it’ll be used for pregnancy complication cases, to carry the child during the last weeks when there are troubles.
Combine that with:
Advanced sex robots, something that we’ll see in the next 20 years.
More and more men becoming MGTOW / MGTOW-like / partially MGTOW, mainly due more and more misandric laws (affirmative consent will be mandatory in Sweden from July 2018).

It wont be the end of women or men, and both sides know it.

What it will do is make women 100% optional.

Plenty of betas and manginas and cucks and simps will be there for women. What this does is make women optional so that men can have kids and have them legally be 100% his, and have kids without ever involving a woman at all.

Cell technology can change a sperm cell to an egg cell so the dna will not ever need to be from a woman. Men will have the ability to choose a gender for their kids. Women will only be able to have girls if they use their own egg dna.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22521]

sidecar wrote:

Male sexbots aren’t going to be buying any drinks or dinners. Or paying child support. Or alimony.

Consider for a moment the women who would actually be in the market for a male sexbot. With that in mind, I’m all in favor of male sexbots. Thing is, women actually aren’t. Not really. Because women don’t actually want men. They want men’s money. Women want men to spend money on them. Women don’t want to spend money on ersatz men.

A small but growing minority of women already buy sex dolls. They make up 5-6% of sex doll customers right now.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

It isn’t the end of women, it’s the end of the feminine monopoly on sex.
I foresee the end of prostitution, of divorce-rape and the end of feminism.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Skeptisk wrote:

It isn’t the end of women, it’s the end of the feminine monopoly on sex.
I foresee the end of prostitution, of divorce-rape and the end of feminism.

That would be the end of women as we know, rather than the end of women.
Prostitution is going to disappear for sure, and marriage contract too, since they’re basically the same. Therefore even divorce rape is going to disappear.
It’ll be interesting to see what will happen to cohabitation:
Will they going to the authoritarian route (cohabitation = marriage contract when it come to rights and DUTIES)?
Will they going to the wise route (cohabitation = no duties nor rights, total freedom)?
Men as whole proved to be quite dumb, so if they’ll choose the authoritarian route I guess that they’ll be able to scam and screw a good portion of another generation of men. But after that it would be the end.
In the second case they would be able to build something, a sort of informal and free social institution, that could actually survive.
I bet on the first option: they cannot think on the long run.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[~BSParticipant 3266]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

sidecar wrote:

Male sexbots aren’t going to be buying any drinks or dinners. Or paying child support. Or alimony.

Consider for a moment the women who would actually be in the market for a male sexbot. With that in mind, I’m all in favor of male sexbots. Thing is, women actually aren’t. Not really. Because women don’t actually want men. They want men’s money. Women want men to spend money on them. Women don’t want to spend money on ersatz men.

A small but growing minority of women already buy sex dolls. They make up 5-6% of sex doll customers right now.

it’s not even a big deal, women have been stuffing anything and everything into their holes, sex doll aint no different. Since it’s not a robot (yet), I can’t see how the doll would be better than their standard dildo, cause it’s not mechanical and doesnt do the thrusting.

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

IRuleMe wrote:

If you’re gonna f~~~ a sex doll, you might as well f~~~ a dead corpse. It’s basically the same thing. I’m starting to wonder about some of you guys. F~~~ing an inanimate object…

Necrophilia: perfect for when you want to crack open a cold one.

Heard that women on average pretty much just lay back and starfish when they have sex, so in that case, a sex doll will be a step up as they will be better looking, free of STDs and no bitching to deal with.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

A small but growing minority of women already buy sex dolls. They make up 5-6% of sex doll customers right now.

Yes, but like I said, consider who those women are.

They also buy a lot of cat food.

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

Funny that the first paragraph in the article lamented that it might “render men incapable of engaging in real human relationships.”.
Ironically, they don’t imply it would “render women incapable” of anything if they have robots.

They can only make it into a weakness for men, and I’m sure a great empowerment tool for women.

It’s so laughable at how much they project.

Edit: Just read the whole article. What a f~~~ing man-hating hit piece!
Just imagine if the gender roles were reversed in this article!

[TaxGuyParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

A small but growing minority of women already buy sex dolls. They make up 5-6% of sex doll customers right now.

Yes, but like I said, consider who those women are.

They also buy a lot of cat food.

Also, I doubt that 5-6% number includes vibrators. Include those and the numbers are probably inverse.

Order the good wine

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

First primitive sex bot.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

The fact is that Male bots will need AI that is years away, in order to stroke her ego and validate her idiotic thoughts 24/7…if after 150,000 years men haven’t figured it out, then this AI is a long way off.

Sovereignty above all else.

[GrumpyParticipant]

IRuleMe wrote:

If you’re gonna f~~~ a sex doll, you might as well f~~~ a dead corpse. It’s basically the same thing. I’m starting to wonder about some of you guys. F~~~ing an inanimate object…

I read that and burst out laughing, because the thought of women “who just lay there” came into the equation.
Inanimate objects ….

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Cataphract wrote:

El C~~~o Punto wrote:

If you’re gonna f~~~ a sex doll, you might as well f~~~ a dead corpse. It’s basically the same thing. I’m starting to wonder about some of you guys. F~~~ing an inanimate object…

Necrophilia: perfect for when you want to crack open a cold one.

Heard that women on average pretty much just lay back and starfish when they have sex, so in that case, a sex doll will be a step up as they will be better looking, free of STDs and no bitching to deal with.

This made me laugh out loud! Thanks!! 😀

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Knights Templar Rising wrote:

The fact is that Male bots will need AI

Naw. Male bots will need to come with a wallet and unlimited line of credit before they will truly gain universal appeal for women.

[StealthParticipant 5339]

“Watching John with the machine, it was suddenly so clear. The terminator, would never stop. It would never leave him, and it would never hurt him, never shout at him, or get drunk and hit him, or say it was too busy to spend time with him. It would always be there. And it would die, to protect him. Of all the would-be fathers who came and went over the years, this thing, this machine, was the only one who measured up. In an insane world, it was the sanest choice.”

— Sarah Conner, Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Author]

Posts