one topic. LAYDEEZ = PARASITES

[experiencedParticipant]

Just came across this.
Unbelievable and proud of it.
I don’t think anyone here will ask either of them out.

View post on imgur.com

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Buller100Participant 2189]

It’s common in UK, tragic way to live…

[TorchemParticipant 453]

Same here in OZ. I got fair amount of single mums living in my area with their kids nicely spaced out so don’t have to look for work, sponge off the system and collect child support.

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

We had this topic yesterday.

/forums/topic/reason-number-89893415700-to-not-date-single-mothers/

Can it be merged. KM?
I know it is difficult to keep up with it all!

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[AscendedParticipant 698]

I call human scum on this.

"We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."

[narwhalParticipant]

The problem is there are only 4 answers to this problem, and none of them are good.

1 – Cut or lower benefits to remove incentive. The child will suffer from this.

2 – Remove the child from mom. Child suffers.

3 – Forced birth control. I don’t like giving government this much power.

4 – Forced abortion. I really don’t like giving the government this much power.

I suppose shaming and MGTOW will help the situation tremendously, but shaming is heading in the wrong direction, and MGTOW has a long way to go before it has a significant impact in this area.

Ok. Then do it.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

narwhal wrote:

Cut or lower benefits to remove incentive. The child will suffer from this.

the child wont happen.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Option 1, cut ALL BENEFITS for single mothers.

This ideia of giving money to the “poor” aka lazy, stupid and uneducated people is ridiculous.

Why is the white, middle class men paying for the children of the poor?
So we can have more and more of this parasites in the social system?

The lazy females get pregnant and get tax benefits and money.
The stupid males steal and destroy.

why are we paying these weeds to reproduce? They are a plague on society.

Its the middle class, aka the middle class men that brunts the weight of society.
Its the middle class that should get money for having kids, not this human c~~~roaches.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Strong and independent

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant 591]

narwhal wrote:

1 – Cut or lower benefits to remove incentive. The child will suffer from this.

2 – Remove the child from mom. Child suffers.

The child is already screwed, it was born to a single mother

[BeerParticipant 11832]

narwhal wrote:

3 – Forced birth control. I don’t like giving government this much power.

I don’t get why this is bad…you want assistance…get one of those implants that lasts for 3 years or whatever and if you are off assistance for a year and can prove you won’t be back on it in the near future, they’ll remove it early…otherwise you don’t need any more f~~~ing kids when you can’t even take care of what you have.

I’m not a huge fan of big government myself, but I’d rather have some c~~~ be told no than the government dig a little deeper into my wallet.

[Author]

Posts