Obama's new treason?

Topic by BlacqueJacqueShellacque

BlacqueJacqueShellacque

Home Forums Political Corner Obama's new treason?

This topic contains 5 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Cataphract  Cataphract 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #371192
    +5
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    Participant
    6890

    I am a Canadian but I mainly follow American politics. America, The Republic, is the world’s last hope for individual freedom. If anyone out there can elaborate on this story it will be much appreciated.

    https://conservativedailypost.com/obama-has-just-violated-u-s-code-2388-guilty-of-treasonous-war-crimes-against-america/?utm_source=Email&utm_campaign=15_December&utm_medium=Aweber

    #371208
    +5
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    it takes a canadian to inform me about this…
    i would laugh but that’s f~~~ed up on so many levels.
    where are Trump’s lawyers???
    this sabatoge has to be dealt with legally.

    #371238
    +5
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    Participant
    6890

    And the c~~~~~~~~~’s fake birth certificate …

    http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/investigators-find-source-for-obamas-online-birth-certification-image/

    Published four hours ago after a years worth of law enforcement investigation.

    #371277
    +5
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    Sorry guys it pains me to do this but no–its not a violation, it is s~~~ty politics but not a war crime and here is why:

    The statute states: “Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”

    According to the Article “Obama told military members that they have a “universal right to protest against authority,” and that they “can criticize our president without retribution.”

    Problem #1: The legislative history of 2388 (Yes I looked it up) suggests that the “war” must be a declared war, i.e. declared by congress, or a “police action”. I neither case some congressional action is required.

    Problem #2 Does “protest” or “criticism” constitute insubordination? It can be but is not necessarily. Is it disloyal, or incitement to disaffection? Again it can be but is not necessarily.

    I don’t believe as a legal matter this dog will hunt. And even if it did who exactly is going to prosecute Obama? Lorrette Lynch, his own Attorney General? Not likely. Sorry guys.

    #371300
    +2
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    Participant
    6890

    Thank you PistolPete. I hold on to my hopes that all of those who have been fraudulently running America will be brought to justice. I’ll keep reading.

    #371335
    +1
    Cataphract
    Cataphract
    Participant
    2656

    I guess he’s p~~~ed off that he had to eat his words when he said “I don’t think Donald Trump will be President”.

    Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.