No Such Thing As A Marriage Contract

[Anonymous 6]

Why the “contract” of marriage is no contract at all.
A contract has requirements for both parties, which define “performance of contract”.
There are only requirements for the man in a marriage contract.

A contract has remedies for non-performance, and even penalties for breach of contract.
There are only remedies for the female, and penalties for the man.

Since 50% of marriages end in divorce and 75% are initiated by women:

When a woman divorces because unhappy or she found another c~~~ to ride, the former husband should be able to SUE HER for breach of contract. He can calculate the financial losses of what the dissolution of the marriage will cost him.

How’s that for a commitment my little darlings?

What would the divorce rate be if women were accountable for saying “f~~~ this” to a contract they signed up for? Why would any man with half a brain sign up for a contract with only protection and remedies for her and only requirements and penalties for him? That’s not a contract, that’s a man signing his rights, b~~~~ and life away to some woman who will likely either make him unhappy and whipped or worse, divorce his @$$ and make him downright miserable.

I always hear women demanding that former spouses and lovers “buck up” and “man up”. How about women become responsible for their part in dissolving relationships and contracts, and woman up, buck up and maybe shut the f*ck up once in a while too.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Sounds good on paper. Don’t try it in the real world.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

The “marriage contract” has become a fraudulent contract.

MARRIAGE IS FRAUD

And I just got sick and tired of women always bringing it up. It got so tedious I stopped trying to explain why marriage is fraud to them, that I wrote my OWN contract…. and when they mentioned “marriage”, I said “you mean marriage CONTRACT”, I said I was all for it, told them to sign it and handed them a PEN.

The Top item on it is :
#1 You will stop talking whenever I request it.

“OMG LOL!! Are you kidding?”

“How is that a problem. Consider all the s~~~ you expect from your husband and fiancee in order to make you “happy”. Not talking is actually asking NOTHING from you. It takes less effort than applying a lipstick. So if you’re not even interested in doing nothing to please your husband, then you are simply not marriageable.”

( runs out crying )

When you write your own marriage contract with your own terms and outline them as important to you, women f~~~ing hate it. Because they think a marriage contract is just about giving her whatever SHE wants, and your wants and needs are a non-consideration.

I don’t even argue against it anymore. I just wrote out my own marriage contract – outlying all the terms – and hand her a pen. They never dare mention it again.

#2 Divorce is unacceptable.

Next time a woman mentions “marriage” or asks why you’re “not married”, tell her “I don’t believe in divorce”. This response actually irritates them. They are the sex that happily flaunts the term “starter husband”, and I will be nobody’s “starter” husband.

She should AGREE that divorce is not acceptable — that’s what VOWS UNTIL DEATH are for — she should consider it noble and charming that I would only marry for life. But the women who are bothered by that response don’t want a marriage contract to STAY married to you. They want to be able to DIVORCE you.

By the time they get to “#3 you will greet me every day with a smile until you are dead“, they already realized they are not worth marrying in the first place and should probably shut their f~~~ing mouths about it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[narwhalParticipant]

If I could right my own marriage contract, it would be entirely different then KMs. It would have nothing to do with behavior at all, and entirely related to money. It really wouldn’t be too much different then a partnership.

1 – She and I (‘parties’) are still single legal entities but are also parties to the marriage, a completely separate legal entity. The parties would own are their own assets, while the marriage entity owns it’s own assets. All financial decisions of the marriage must be agreed upon by both parties.

For example, if I buy a house before marriage, I retain full ownership of it (unless I donate it to the marriage, which I am not obligated to do). Any profit from the sale of the home is entirely mine, regardless of when the sale occurs. On the other hand, any debts, such as student loan debt or credit card debt, are not automatically absorbed by the Marriage either. If she or I are sued or face other legal action, the action would be taken against the individual parties, not the marriage. Any medical bills are responsibility of the individual parties, not the marriage.

2 – All finances for a marriage entity will be maintained in an account(s) that tracks each parties financial contribution to the marriage during the life of the marriage. Neither party is required to make any financial contributions to the marriage.

3 – Upon divorce (dissolution of the marriage) the marriage entities assets are divided amongst the parties according to their individual contributions. If she only contributed 20% to the marriage, she will get 20% in the divorce. There is no financial incentive to divorce.

4 – Any children born during the marriage are not party to the marriage entity by default. Both parents must agree to childcare terms in a separate agreement before or upon the birth of the child. The agreement should define terms of child care if the parents are living together AND if the parents are living apart.

5 – There are no behavioral requirements of either party. Divorce can be initiated at any time by either party without providing a reason. The cost of divorce can be paid for by the marriage up to a set amount. After that point, each party must pay for their own legal expenses.

6- There are no gender requirements for members of the marriage. There is no limit to the number of people in the marriage either.

Given these stipulations, behavior shouldn’t be a problem. If she talks too much and is unbearable to live with you, you can divorce her and take with you what you brought in. If she doesn’t like that, her only option is to change her behavior. Both parties stand to gain through the marriage, assuming both parties are financially contributing.

If you want to have a traditional marriage where the woman doesn’t work that can be arranged. The woman should stipulate childcare payments from the father during the times where when she is not working or in the case of divorce. This would be part of the child contract, not the marriage. She could contribute the money to the marriage or retain it herself as she wishes.

Ok. Then do it.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

narwhal wrote:

If I could write my own marriage contract

You CAN.

That’s the beauty of it all.

If every man did, no women will badger him for a wedding again. Have your marriage contracts ready, gents. Put all of your terms wants and needs on it and make them GOOD! Then when she brings up “marriage”…. say “oh you mean a marriage contract?? GREAT IDEA!” ….. and happily shove it in her face with a pen.

🙂

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

Keymaster wrote:

You CAN.

Who cares?

There is no way in hell the “you will have sex with me every day” will be respected and upheld by any court of law.

You can put anything in the contract, but that doesn’t mean a court will respect it; that is true of every contract, not just marriage ones.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Rockmaninoff wrote:

There is no way in hell the “you will have sex with me every day” will be respected and upheld by any court of law.

You’re missing the point. You can put ANYTHING ON IT that you need to be happy…. and it doesn’t even need to be ridiculous! She will run screaming away from that s~~~.

There isn’t a woman within 20000 miles of you who would be willing to stop talking and f~~~ off if you don’t want her around, just because it makes you “happy”. That makes her unmarriageble on the spot.

This isn’t to get her to actually SIGN.
It’s to get her to never mention it again.

Rockmaninoff wrote:

court

A marriage contract is a fraudulent contract – by law – and NO man should ever sign a marriage contract with a woman who hates him enough to actually let him go through with it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

She will run screaming away from that s~~~.

Or she will readily agree to all your terms in the happy knowledge that such a marriage contract would be immediately thrown out by the gynocentric divorce courts and replaced with the boilerplate “she gets all your stuff” contract. Go along with it, sign on the dotted line, even on a paper you composed, and you’re still f~~~ed.

No marriage. No terms. No exceptions. Ever.

[narwhalParticipant]

I meant an actual legal contract, if it could be actual legally upheld in court. I would not bother with one now since it would be meaningless. Although it is fun to think on it, and agree that most women would run, despite the fact that what I wrote is gender neutral and equal…exactly what they claim to want.

I don’t see the need in scaring her off when a simple No will do just fine. If it comes to her questioning why, I don’t need to create my own requirements, I simply need to briefly explain why the marriage contract is absolutely unacceptable.

Ok. Then do it.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

narwhal wrote:

I don’t see the need in scaring her off when a simple No will do just fine

When in all of history did you ever tell a woman “no” and she just accepted it.

Please tell me how.

narwhal wrote:

I simply need to briefly explain why the marriage contract is absolutely unacceptable.

Good answer, but some of of them will still pretend to not understand why , and then they sucker you into their depressing frame, and you just spent your evening explaining s~~~ to women who can’t WAIT to say “YOU”RE JUST BITTER!!”

They don’t stand a chance.

The main reason for this is mostly because when the topic comes up, and depending on the setting, you have a few choices based on what kind of mushroom cloud you want to leave behind.

When someone says “marriage” you can say:

• “Marriage is for gays”.
• “I don’t believe in divorce”.

… or you can get all excited about it, make the conversation FUN and talk about your marriage contract which you drafted is just waiting to be signed!! And they get all curious and ask!! And then I tell them the #1 top item is “you will shut the f~~~ up and stop talking whenever I request it”.

Any woman who has a problem with that (and they all do) outs herself as totally unworthy of being anybody’s bride.

I’m telling you, it’s a laugh riot.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 54]

Don’t sign a bad contract.Have a lawyer go over it with you first.He (Yes HE)will tell you it’s a bad deal don’t sign it.

[foghornleghornParticipant 3449]

Never sign a contract where the terms have to do with your life and freedom. That is in essence what a marriage contract is for a man – the signing over your life and freedom for sex (which is not even guaranteed).

[Red_Pill_SouljaParticipant 221]

Guys, I was trying to explain to my friend that he shouldn’t get married because its a bad deal for the man.

His response was that here in the UK, if you get married your kids get 700,000 tax free inheritance compared to 325,000 if not married. I’ve not heard this argument come up for before and did not have a response.

Is there a counter argument?

[FreedomParticipant 295]

The absolute best thing you can do for your kids is spring for a good education, and put them in the best college you can afford (so they will make connections with tomorrow’s entrepreneurs).

Their inheritance is something they get after YOU die, by which time (ideally) they will already be raising kids of their own. At that stage in their life, the money won’t bump them up to a new income bracket or anything…it will just help them pay off a few debts.

But the foundation in their education will give them the best chance of doing better for themselves right from the get-go.

And you can do all that without being married.

It is wise to fear dangerous commitments.

[Author]

Posts