no content, just links to news articles

[Daryll55Participant 2953]

I will just post this; (you can form your own conclusions)

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2019/04/12/p-g-ad-chief-calls-for-new-digital-platforms.html?ana=yahoo&yptr=yahoo

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2018/04/20/p-g-resumes-advertising-on-youtube-after-1-year.html

Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)

[AposematicParticipant 2671]

My conclusion that militant lesbian producer shut down $2 billion in advertisibg…nice!

Afinogyny.. from the Greek Afino {to abandon/ to set down/ to leave /to allow/ to let } + Gyny {Women} MGHOW’s philosophy to not engage women without “hating them”. Narcorca =Narcissistic Orca typically spouting to a bathroom mirror taking an arms length selfie ; Wallinate describes post wall females whose SMV is terminally negligible New Years resolution "To not make women happy" . Instadestitue: yet another Neologism for Men that cohabit with women that decide to pull the handle of intervention orders.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Youtube advertising, and internet advertising in general, is largely a waste of money anyways.

That being said, I find it amusing that she was so concerned about protecting P&G brands when I can’t think of a single one by name that I buy. Certainly not gillette.

[Anonymous 3]

The two articles, Orwellian in nature, say the same: the brand is complaining about the free nature of the internet and what people make of their advertising.

Their wet dream is that they can say whatever they want without any commentary. Their goal is that no voice is allowed to contradict their message. Their end is that they have full control of the medium.

And they are close to it.

As if there is another reason necessary to boycott these mother.fu.ckers… they provide another one.

Another thing that is patent is the impact of the backslash. Under the newspeak wording and the calls for digital tyranny, they recognize that they have been hurt. I am happy for it and believe should go further.

[Daryll55Participant 2953]

Anonymous wrote:

Their wet dream is that they can say whatever they want without any commentary. Their goal is that no voice is allowed to contradict their message. Their end is that they have full control of the medium

Yeah I gpt the “Orwellian” vibe too when I read a little into the articles.
Seems TV as an advertising medium is OUT Internet s IN. Corporations need CONTROL of the medium in order to supress any dissent. Google is CO-OPERATING with these companies because it is BIG MONEY. Cencorship or Freedom on the internet; either way there is bound to be manipulation.
Alex Jones and shadow banning is UST THE BEGINNING.

(for the record;I didn’t support Alex Jones, but believe he has the right to free speech.)

Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Anonymous wrote:

Their wet dream is that they can say whatever they want without any commentary. Their goal is that no voice is allowed to contradict their message. Their end is that they have full control of the medium.

And they are close to it.

They are only close to it on platforms that people are walking away from.

Daryll55 wrote:

Seems TV as an advertising medium is OUT Internet s IN.

Pretty much, though it’s not so much that the internet is “in” as it’s all that’s left.

Advertising in general has seen a rapid decline in returns for advertising dollars spent across all mediums. Now this downward trend is the norm, people over time develop a natural resistance to advertising requiring advertisers to constantly up their game, but over the past decade or so it’s completely collapsed.

Why?

Because people simply do not trust the media the advertisements are on. When intelligent people (the sort who tend to have money to spend) find out that CNN has been lying to them for years about muh russiagate (and literally everything else), they stop trusting CNN. That distrust spreads to anything advertised on CNN by association. And that’s for whatever audience CNN still manages to retain; most viewers simply walk away, never to see the advertisements the advertisers paid to run on CNN.

There’s more to it than this, but it all boils down to the fact that advertising on television is largely a waste of money. So where are advertisers going to go? Newspapers? Print is dead. The radio? Radio audiences only buy certain products and are already notoriously difficult to advertise to (mostly because most of the radio audience listens at work – which means the radio audience has jobs).

The internet is really the only option left, and it’s a bad option. You can’t put adblockers on the radio, but you can on a web browser.

P&G aren’t advertising on the internet again because they now feel safe enough to control the content. They’re advertising on the internet because they literally have nowhere else to go.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Tsk Tsk. I guess men don’t forget.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Author]

Posts