New “Psychological Abuse” legislation in the U.K. neuters men.

[economistParticipant 225]

Hey there guys. Got another article for you, this one’s a little old but I hadn’t seen it before. If somebody has already called attention to this one please let me know.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-psychological-abuse-law-a6789271.html

Essentially an updated definition of domestic abuse has been signed into law in the U.K. we already know that domestic abuse laws are essentially one sided and that women are immune from most of them. Well, this new legislation covers “psychological abuse” which in the article is defined as:

Isolating a person from their friends and family
Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear and when they sleep
Repeatedly putting them down, such as telling them they are worthless
Enforcing rules and activity which humiliate, degrade or dehumanise the victim
Financial abuse
Threats to reveal or publish private information

Now don’t get me wrong, I think beating a woman is just as wrong as a woman beating you. But you have to understand that within a relationship, there are these things called “boundaries”. You know, don’t sleep with other people, don’t go out clubbing, etc. are very common ones. And it seems like in this context that if you told your girlfriend “I don’t want you to go out late at night to the bar with that guy, i’m uncomfortable with it.” She could go to the police and have you arrested as a domestic abuser. Considering women constantly play the abuse card on their ex-es, i’m sure this is going to see a huge attendant spike in men being turned in to the police in spite. What is the point of a relationship if even the idea of monogamy is now considered abusive, but only if a man expects it from a woman? This s~~~ is insane.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

economist wrote:

Isolating a person from their friends and family
Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear and when they sleep
Repeatedly putting them down, such as telling them they are worthless
Enforcing rules and activity which humiliate, degrade or dehumanise the victim
Financial abuse
Threats to reveal or publish private information

And women do this all the time. It is not just being falsely accused by a woman, but the hypocrisy of a woman that does this falsely accusing a man of doing being guilty of these actions towards the man she is falsely accusing.

Where a law states that if a man does this to a woman they go to jail, while a woman is allowed to do the same thing to a man all day long, without free of imprisonment.

You are going to see british men wash their hands of society, with them allowing the muslims to take over. With their reasoning being that either the women are going to be put into burkas, or the men are going to be put in prison.

I do not seen how men can function within a society under these laws. I just don’t see it.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

I know more women that emotionally abuse their husbands and bfs. But of course, I’m sure this like many laws don’t apply to women.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

I know more women that emotionally abuse their husbands and bfs.

From shaming to s~~~ testing, women are guilty of this entire list without even trying. They are taught to do this. And now they want to falsely accuse and jail men for what they are guilty of doing all the time.

And it is such a subjective law that it can literally apply to any action.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Even if you could have a woman charged for abuse, then what? You still lose in the divorce. Men won’t file charges if they are being abused. It’s a lose-lose. They’ll go on hating life or hang themselves. Or, as we’ve seen already, kill their spouse and even their kids and then hang themselves.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 54]

Any man that gets married is an utter fool.Youd think this would even wake the manginas up.Who are the morons that help pass this law? Dont they know that there wives will use it against them?

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Walk away and let it burn.

Live YOUR life and DON’T bring a child into this world.

You can’t fall off the floor.

[HitmanParticipant]

IF courts were fair, men could use this as well..
just dreaming out loud, sorry .
cold reality is the set up for the doomsday scenario.
thought-crime is next.
it all reeks of feminist control mechanisms being put into place ..
one brick at a time ..
they build the wall between the sexes and cry “where are all the good men ?
perhaps we fail to see the logic behind INSANITY .

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Anonymous wrote:

Any man that gets married is an utter fool.Youd think this would even wake the manginas up.Who are the morons that help pass this law? Dont they know that there wives will use it against them?

You think this is just going to apply to married couples. This will apply to boys and men in general. To boyfriends, to even basic association between men and women.

Eventually, it will trickle down to mothers jailing their own sons, after arguments, on the grounds the sons were being emotionally abusive to the mothers for disagreeing with them.

[Anonymous 2]

The way I see it such laws won’t affect much. If a woman does not behave in accordance to my will (and applies common sense) I end the relationship. As long as ending it isn’t illegal I don’t see the problem. Take it or leave it. Just don’t be married or buy a house together in the first place.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Anonymous wrote:

The way I see it such laws won’t affect much. If a woman does not behave in accordance to my will (and applies common sense) I end the relationship. As long as ending it isn’t illegal I don’t see the problem. Take it or leave it. Just don’t be married or buy a house together in the first place.

Of course it changes things. This is a thought crime. Previous accusations before this law, in theory, still required physical evidence of some sort to file a charge.

The evidence for this law is the woman’s “feelings”. It is all emotion, nothing tangible that can be defended against in a court of law.

[economistParticipant 225]

Inxentas, except that by being in the relationship, you have already committed the original sin. When you end the relationship because she disagrees with you, you are guilty of emotional abuse by trying to prevent her from doing what she wants. At that point it is up to you to prove in a court of law that you didn’t hurt her feelings… Good luck with that.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Go on a date; go to jail.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 25]

The law was brought in under pressure from Women’s Aid. Women’s Aid is an illegal cartel and they know it full well. This is to do with jobs for the girls. Women’s Aid sell training to the police and social services etc. The message from Women’s Aid is, it’s all men, it’s all men.

The CEO of Women’s Aid is likely to be going to jail in the next 5-10 years over this as well as other prominent feminists.

Reputable organisations like the British Psychological Society are already pushing back:

http://www.bps.org.uk/news/women-more-aggressive-partners-men

This is going to turn into one hell of a fight and it’s women against women. Most of the researchers at the British Psychological Society are females (who have had male relatives affected by this issue).

This is going to be a real cat fight and turn nasty. My money is on feminists at Women’s Aid and the criminal injustice system going to jail over this. They are training the police etc to target men and that is putting the lives of men and children at risk and also falsely sending men to jail. The police lie, any man in the UK in a relations~~~ better make sure he is constantly recording with a digital voice recorder. And if she calls the police, record them too. They lie.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Effective household final planning could be a violation.

You know denying her money to spend on the latest fad vs saving for retirement is a violation of the law.

Any man that marries these days is a fool.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

Don’t worry they’ll push it more.
Get ready for “having a XY chromosome” abuse laws being passed in the near future.

[Anonymous 3]

Isolating a person from their friends and family
Controlling what they do, where they go, who they can see, what they wear and when they sleep
Repeatedly putting them down, such as telling them they are worthless
Enforcing rules and activity which humiliate, degrade or dehumanise the victim
Financial abuse
Threats to reveal or publish private information

The most terrifying about this law is the wording. It can be expanded to arbitrary length, to jail people for arbitrary reasons, if they dislike someone. Just they need a lawyer with the jargon to convince the judge.

And, a relationship in general, violates this law:

-a relationship of any type does take a lot of time (especially children), so that it (somewhat) isolates people from friends and family,
-in relationship one spends time together, meaning that while that time is past, I cannot weld the broken garbage container, or lace a bike wheel on the kitchen table 🙂 while drinking champagne 🙂 , etc. So a relationship tells me what to do. (cause, girls only do boyish stuff like this on Discovery channel maybe max once a year)
-a relationship might cost a lot of money. Like fancy dinners (I just like to microwave something simple, and hope it doesn’t blow up), makeup (better the girl buys & pays them, I dont know that stuff, but sexy behaviour is the best makeup) and gifts (who the hell can guess what she wants… and i dont like to get gifts too)

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

As allways, women get a pussy pass in everything.

Just wait for the muslim invasion of europe and men backlash.

Women are going to have a really bad awakening.

[OracleSummonParticipant 179]

hellraider wrote:

As allways, women get a pussy pass in everything.

Just wait for the muslim invasion of europe and men backlash.

Women are going to have a really bad awakening.

It is frustrating that favors are bent in favor of women.

Women may have a bad awakening, but will they really blame themselves? As if. This invasion happened because we were not “real men” and took precaution to avoid it from happening.

Are some women against these things? Yes, but I doubt they can be fully trusted. There is something to gain and that thing is servitude from men in monogamous relationships.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Anonymous wrote:

The police lie, any man in the UK in a relations~~~ better make sure he is constantly recording with a digital voice recorder. And if she calls the police, record them too.

Nope. Recording women would fall under the “Threats to reveal or publish private information” part of that law. And you would still go to jail over this law.

They have created a law that a man has not legal way to fight. And when civil due process is removed, there will be on uncivil discourse. It is just a question of when.

I am with ILiveAgain on this one. Walk away and let it burn.

There is no way to save western civilization. To make people have worked for too long to tear it down. Just make sure it does not fall on you.

And one other note. When the collapse fully hits, do not allow yourself to be taken alive. Reserve at least one bullet, or another quick way to leave this life without a way to keep you alive.

If these monsters capture they will torture and rape you to make an example of you. With you crime being a western man and in their eyes that will make you responsible for all the pain that you captors are truly guilty of creating.

[Author]

Posts