New Prostitution Economy

[shovelheadriderParticipant 2400]

Is replacing old Prostitution Economy (marriage)
Guys are no longer interested in turning over the control of their dicks and assets to women, that used to look good used love to f~~~(said that until legal papers were signed)
Men grew a pair and say if not in words in actions
if your so strong and independent do it yourself
what is it for me.
I would rather have money in bank than my dick hooptie aka post wall pussy
Honey you can suck a dick or dig a ditch it is an micro aggression to beg men for things that a strong independent women can get herself
http://www.vanityfair.com/style/2016/07/welcome-to-the-new-prostitution-economy

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Its the ultimate end game when women have turned marriage into a financial contract rather than the moral and social agreement that it used to be. That 700 dollars an hour for some sweet young pussy is a discount compared to the cost per lay for a successful middle aged man to get divorced and have to fork over most of his s~~~ to the ex.

The best part is the more women that get into this game the more the price will get driven down and they’ll ruin it for each other, just like they devalued a wife so much by abusing divorce laws that an ever increasing number of men are refusing to marry.

[EyeswideopenParticipant 2930]

While there are plenty of mangina’s and pussy begging simps, I am finding among the newer generation (<30) of financially upward motivated professionals, are walking away from marriage. It’s a slow process, but picking up speed as society heads down the slippery slope.

They have seen firsthand through their parents and grandparents the devastation that divorce can yield.

Especially, when housing can be floated solo by this social-economic group. They are twigging into the simple economics of the situation – I can keep all my s~~~, have maximum freedom, and sample as smorgasbord of pussy.

I believe in the future, marriage/cohabitation, will almost exclusively be the domain of poverty/lower-middle class as a means of survival, and special interest groups like the LGBT community as a social statement. Unfortunately, nanny government will increase taxes to keep the welfare state going as women, through poor reproductive choices, will need a perpetual handout.

Paid sex-professionals, will always be victim of simple economics – supply and demand with a relative modifier for desirability. As more men walk away, supply will increase and the relative cost will come down.

- Marriage is described as an institution. You would have to be crazy to be commited to it. -"If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal. Not people or things" Albert Einstein

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Feminism doesn’t understand the concept of irony. They encourage whorish behaviors, then blame the “Patriarchy” for thinking of women only as whores.
Prostitution would not exist unless there was some desire for it on BOTH sides.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

SHR this is a great article thanks for posting.

Best hamstering in the article:

I ask her why she’s seeking an arrangement. “I want to start a handbag line,” she says. “I have all these great designs and ideas. And I just don’t see how I could ever get together the capital. So an investor would really help.”

Sure you will sweetheart.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

And the more females that do it the lower the cost. Men win.

Supply and demand.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[bob__Participant 946]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

And the more females that do it the lower the cost. Men win.

Supply and demand.

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

[TaxGuyParticipant]

On top of prostitution being cheaper, think about what will happen when birth control is as easy for a man as it is for a woman. What guy is going to forget to take that pill if he is sexually active? Giving men a say in reproductive rights will be a monumental game changer. Right now if a guy has sex he is agreeing to put his entire future in a woman’s hands. Once male contraception is out there a guy can lie just as much as a woman when they are getting in the sack.

Order the good wine

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Miranda is 22 and has the wavy bobbed hair and clipped mid-Atlantic accent of a 1930s movie star; she grew up in a Texas suburb. “I’ve learned how to look like this, talk like this,” she says. “I work hard at being this,”

Because being a sperm toilet for fat cats is much harder than going to college.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

bob__ wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

And the more females that do it the lower the cost. Men win.

Supply and demand.

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

A post wall meat hole for $300 a month vs life time alimony.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[bob__Participant 946]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

bob__ wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

And the more females that do it the lower the cost. Men win.

Supply and demand.

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

A post wall meat hole for $300 a month vs life time alimony.

The more females that want to get married the lower the cost?

[shovelheadriderParticipant 2400]

bob__ wrote:

Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

married guys don’t get to have a pussy fund.A fund that he could buy the young fine mofo when he wants set aside or spend this fund on anything he wants.
Men do not stand up to women and admit that the main reason he picked her was that she the one that he thought liked to f~~~ him and she has done a horrible job in being his woman.
It is all about the contract.She does not have to f~~~ him.She can take him to court and the Judge says.”Bailiff whack his pee pee” Cheech and Chong

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

bob__ wrote:

Jan.Sobieski wrote:

And the more females that do it the lower the cost. Men win.

Supply and demand.

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

Getting married IS cheap. Its getting DIVORCED that will cost you 50% of your stuff and a huge chunk of your future earnings. And given that half of marriages end in divorce and most marriages produce more stress and misery than happiness, you have to factor those costs into the equation and it turns out that just paying market rate for the services you want is more efficient.

Pay a restaurant $25 a day and you’ll have better food than any modern wife can cook, pay a housekeeper $80 every week and you’ll have a cleaner house than any modern wife will provide, pay a hooker $300 whenver the need arises and youll have better (and more varied) sex than any modern wife will give you… and you can live for half the cost with 100% less bitching, whining, nagging and cheating and, in the end, keep all your stuff and never spend a day in divorce court or a dollar on a lawyer.

WAY cheaper.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

bob__ wrote:

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

Because the government got involved and the government f~~~s pretty much everything up.

[bob__Participant 946]

I’d rather just pay once for a fembot that I can use over and over again.

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

bob__ wrote:

That doesn’t make sense. Why isn’t it cheap to just get married then?

The contract.

[Anonymous 24]

I think Jan meant that the more women that get into prostitution, the more it would drive down the cost, which certainly makes sense.

Now on the topic of marriage as prostitution, I grew up with this one girl from elementary school all the way to college, and she was stunningly beautiful. I knew in the third grade that she was going to marry a very wealthy man. And guess what, she did, billionaire wealthy. On top of that this man and his forefathers made their money in some very shady ways, I cannot go into detail, but lets just say that if I ever saw her again I would have a hard time not saying WHAT THE F~~~!

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

emphasis on “new”. Marriage has always been a contract. A man had a part to play and so did women. Now women no longer want to play that part but they want men to keep playing theirs. They want men to take care of them, make money, shower them with compliments ect. You can either formalize the prostitution with a marriage agreement or you can call it what it is, prostitution.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[EyeswideopenParticipant 2930]

Stargazer wrote:

Getting married IS cheap. Its getting DIVORCED that will cost you 50% of your stuff and a huge chunk of your future earnings.

You are correct. Supply and demand with regards to marriage has nothing to do with free market forces. The law has overruled those forces with draconian divorce laws. If free market forces were allowed to rein in the marriage contract there would be penalties for breech of said contract – mostly against the female. Let your looks go, stop having sex, become a bitch, walk – all these would be a material breech of her duties and result in a penalty to the offender. No fault divorce essentially what socialism is to capitalism.

Stargazer wrote:

Pay a restaurant $25 a day and you’ll have better food than any modern wife can cook, pay a housekeeper $80 every week and you’ll have a cleaner house than any modern wife will provide, pay a hooker $300 whenver the need arises and youll have better (and more varied) sex than any modern wife will give you… and you can live for half the cost with 100% less bitching, whining, nagging and cheating and, in the end, keep all your stuff and never spend a day in divorce court or a dollar on a lawyer.

Lets do some quick math with what is outlined above. Assuming a 30 day month and sex once a month – which most marriages and LTR degrade too – 25×30 + 80×4+ 300 = 1370/month. Plus your living like a king with guaranteed satisfaction. Any component does not perform; fire it at no penalty and seek services elsewhere. Marriage does not make economic sense.

- Marriage is described as an institution. You would have to be crazy to be commited to it. -"If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal. Not people or things" Albert Einstein

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Eyeswideopen wrote:

Lets do some quick math with what is outlined above. Assuming a 30 day month and sex once a month – which most marriages and LTR degrade too – 25×30 + 80×4+ 300 = 1370/month. Plus your living like a king with guaranteed satisfaction.

Hear hear. And if you cook for yourself at home, youll save even more and eat even better. Clean your own house, or at least everything but the bathroom, and you’ll enjoy the satisfaction of ownership and curation. Handle your own business sexually for the most part, catch some free tail now and then when you do and splurge on exactly the size, shape, color and style of woman you want when you buy professionally and you’ll never want for physical release.

And then when a random woman slides up next to you at the bar and offers to let you buy her a drink, you can look her dead in the eyes and calmly say “There is no reason for me to purchase you a drink unless you are bringing something extraordinary to the table.” then watch her wither up and blow away like a vampire in the sunlight.

The power to say that and mean it is priceless.

[Author]

Posts