My philosophy of why it is the way it is

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

I have posted enough that my slant is known.

Whether I am right or wrong matters not. What I think effects nothing. It does not come from a place of hate or love. Nor is it to define good or evil. What is, is. It always has before and will continue. All I have is age and the knowledge discovered from it.

What is?
There are three genders.
There is male, female and fetus.

Which is most valuable?
The fetus. The baby. The child. The teenager. The young adult.

When I say that a woman has the nature of the devil it is meant as a literal statement.

How can I generalize?
Because, only woman can conceive and grow a fetus within their body. Only a person that can grow a fetus within their womb can have the nature of the devil. It isn’t something that a woman chooses. It is a necessity of life and survival.

I am not saying that they are THE devil. Only that they are a devil. It is not my fault that this word has a negative connotation. It doesn’t make the statement false or true. Actions make reality what it is. Actions of necessity.

My being a man has no bearing upon the truth of the statement. If I had never been born it would have no impact upon the reality.

Women have to have the nature of the devil. It is inherent in their survival. It isn’t about love or hate. It is about survival. Survival of the fetus.

How can a woman do two things at once?
She needs to acquire the resources needed for survival. Men. Men. Men.

With a man hauling the load a woman can do what is necessary for them. Woman do not do. They get others to do. It is their nature.

As my father said to me, “this statement is not an argument. It is the way it is”

So, to the young men out their. Understand one thing. Whether the statement is right or wrong matters not. You should treat every woman you meet as if she is a devil. Do not and you will find out the truth the hard way.

Peace brothers

[Anonymous 54]

I was thinking the other day about why women cant really love a man.
Back in cave man days( Im still there) a female needed the biggest ape that could bring her food.
If the big ape were to be inconpacitated she would need to go to anouther big ape.
An emotional bond would prevent this, and she would starve to death.

It is simpley a hard wired survivale tactick.

Not good or bad, unless you expect that they can love you.

They Cant.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DorkShit wrote:

What is, is.

I accept it another way. Shaking your fist at “female nature” is like shaking your fist at the sun for gamma rays. Or criticizing a kangaroo for hopping. Pointless and futile.

But we should also very consciously stay away from the “it is what it is” mentality, because that’s COMPLACENT. It also absolves the female of responsibility. She does something unacceptable,and then you just shrug your shoulders and say “well that’s just female nature. It is was it is.”

No. It is –>> WHAT YOU MAKE IT.

I won’t let her get away wth that “hell hath no fury” stuff. Like by nature of being born with a vagina, she now has license to behave like destructive c~~~. And this even BEFORE he has done anything wrong.

Absolutely unacceptable. And I don’t give a f~~~ that it’s “in her nature” to be that way. She is f~~~ing conscious and totally aware of what she is doing. And she is doing it ON PURPOSE – and millions women find it fun , lol and entertaining.

But even worse, they think it’s justifiable.

DorkShit wrote:

So, to the young men out their. Understand one thing. Whether the statement is right or wrong matters not.

It matters.

DorkShit wrote:

You should treat every woman you meet as if she is a devil.

You should treat every woman according her OWN behavior.

• When she behaves like a bitch, you treat her like a bitch.
• When she behaves like a angel, you treat her like angel as long as you understand that she can switch to bitch on a dime – even when it’s not justified.

That’s fair and reasonable.

Any woman who has a problem with that is just looking to get treated like an angel while trying to get away with behaving like a bitch.

That’s NOT reasonable.

Personally, I simply refuse to absolve women of their own actions and behavior and say “oh that’s just her nature. She was born that way”. Forget it.

This is my personal approach and it has served me very well. As a result I don’t need to “think of women” as anything at all. I place that responsibility where it belongs — >> on HER.
/forums/topic/dear-mgtow-brothers-i-feel-better-and-i-thank-you/#post-357753

You can’t justify treating women “like a devil”, and ignore to your own detriment. But you can always justify treating her according to her own behavior. You can even justify rubbing her own nose in it with the same enthusiasm that you can treat her well for the kindness and courtesy she extends to you (if any).

What she is is up to her.
Not how a man perceives her.

As a man, I am actually able to put myself in other people’s shoes. And if I were a woman and a man said he would treat me according to my own behavior, I would be THRILLED. Now the rest is up to her. Only an extreme bitch would have a problem with that.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 5]

Our large brains are the problem.
Our brain containers (skulls) are so large that women “run like girls” because of the over-exaggerated child birth process.

Also, our brains are so large and advanced we require extraordinary extended childhoods to develop compared to any other species. This leaves the female almost totally dependant on the male for the majority of her life for protection and resources.
This has led to women evolving characteristics that both physically attract and mentally control males for her benefit and the benefit of the offspring as well as evolving bodies suitable for birth and care of offspring.

Sexual dimorphism in humans is unlike other animals where the male develops unnatural mating characteristics to secure a mate, almost always disadvantaging him for survival purposes.
Look at the obvious gaudy colours of male birds that disadvantage them as targets, but virtually all males of every species are affected.

We know from skeletal evidence that the hunt was a dangerous and brutal process. It doesn’t take much imagination to confirm that any hunting expedition could quickly turn to horror.
We know from current documentaries that in tribal hunter gatherer communities men get manipulated and nagged into going out hunting. Women use a variety of pleading and shaming tactics to get them out.

If women stayed in romantic love it’d be almost impossible to send out a man into the hunt constantly, or send him off against potential rival killer tribes. In both cases there’s every possibility he’ll be maimed or killed.
For human evolution, love is only necessary to secure the female a mate. The moment the male is emotionally owned it’s a massive disadvantage and evolutionary suicide to stay in love for the female and offspring.

On the other hand, if men didn’t stay permanently under love’s magic spell, and only thought about their own survival, the human race would have died out long ago.

And then along came civilisation where women’s manipulative skills out trump men’s physical skills every time when it comes to rule making.
Where every state evolves into a gynocracy when leaving a partner is a financial windfall for a woman. Where a woman can still successfully harvest a man as a resource and not even have any interaction with him.
We have mountains of records of divorce property settlements, alimony and child support from the Summarians, the very first civilisation that used writing.
Women haven’t changed since then, nor have men, and every civilisation that’s followed, has followed the same gynocentric decay.

[Anonymous 54]

Cave Men got nagged.Thats gonna take a while to prosses! Hahh

[Greg HondaParticipant 6406]

@ KM and Trail,

Thats why I come here everyday. The shared insight and wisdom. I had just accepted that Hypergamy was in their nature and I shouldn’t blame them. Now I realise that just because its their nature at a primal level, it doesn’t mean they can’t rise above it and be better people. As a man my primal nature would lead me to hunt out and domminate females for my satisfaction and procreation, but society has evolved and I have to abide by the rules or suffer. I guess the fact that they rarely have to suffer consequences for their actions means they never needed to evolve beyond their primal instincs.

Every days a “School Day” here 🙂

It's Time to get Wise

[Anonymous 54]

@gh.Yes. We Men are expected to over come our instincts, rien ouselves in, for the good of society.
Women are completely free to go with them.
From everything from lieing, stealling, violence, Hell, even murder.

[Anonymous 5]

Yet ironically I am happier alone.

Nothing ironic about it.
It’s the upside of male disposability.
Males are disposable in just about all animal species, including mammals and especially primates.

For male disposability to work there has to be a supply of perfectly capable males to replace the disposed males. He has to be perfectly capable both physically, mentally and psychologically, or otherwise male disposabilty becomes a liability.

So males of every species evolve splendidly in isolation, at every level of existence.
In some cases they even live with the herd or group but here they’re mostly living on the fringes and in nearly all cases the group is a matriarchy.
The vast majority of male mammals live their whole lives in solitude, always ready and perfectly capable to replace disposed males. From genetic evidence only one in five human males reproduced from about 50,000 to 10,000 years ago.

Therefore, bask in the glory of your solitude, you’re genetically wired to enjoy and thrive in it.
It’s your ideal state.

On the other hand, women are genetically wired to survive and thrive in social interaction.
Social ostracism is an inhumane punishment for them.
Solitude for them is a long cruel death sentence.

[Anonymous 54]

Anonymous wrote:

Sausage Fingers wrote:

Yet ironically I am happier alone.

Nothing ironic about it.
It’s the upside of male disposability.
Males are disposable in just about all animal species, including mammals and especially primates.

For male disposability to work there has to be a supply of perfectly capable males to replace the disposed males. He has to be perfectly capable both physically, mentally and psychologically, or otherwise male disposabilty becomes a liability.

So males of every species evolve splendidly in isolation, at every level of existence.
In some cases they even live with the herd or group but here they’re mostly living on the fringes and in nearly all cases the group is a matriarchy.
The vast majority of males live their whole lives in solitude, always ready and perfectly capable to replace disposed males. From genetic evidence only one in five males reproduced from about 50,000 to 10,000 years ago.

Therefore, bask in the glory of your solitude, you’re genetically wired to enjoy and thrive in it.
It’s your ideal state.

On the other hand, women are genetically wired to survive and thrive in social interaction.
Social ostracism is an inhumane punishment for them.
Solitude for them is a long cruel death sentence.

Thanks! You make my love of solitude sound so normal!
I get tired of hearing on the news”The murderer was a loner”.
They dont mention the murderers with lots of friends that like to hang out!Hahah

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

Keymaster wrote:

Darksith wrote:

What is, is.

I accept it another way. Shaking your fist at “female nature” is like shaking your fist at the sun for gamma rays. Or criticizing a kangaroo for hopping. Pointless and futile.

But we should also very consciously stay away from the “it is what it is” mentality, because that’s COMPLACENT. It also absolves the female of responsibility. She does something unacceptable,and then you just shrug your shoulders and say “well that’s just female nature. It is was it is.”

No. It is –>> WHAT YOU MAKE IT.

I won’t let her get away wth that “hell hath no fury” stuff. Like by nature of being born with a vagina, she now has license to behave like destructive c~~~. And this even BEFORE he has done anything wrong.

Absolutely unacceptable. And I don’t give a f~~~ that it’s “in her nature” to be that way. She is f~~~ing conscious and totally aware of what she is doing. And she is doing it ON PURPOSE – and millions women find it fun , lol and entertaining.

But even worse, they think it’s justifiable.

Darksith wrote:

So, to the young men out their. Understand one thing. Whether the statement is right or wrong matters not.

It matters.

Darksith wrote:

You should treat every woman you meet as if she is a devil.

You should treat every woman according her OWN behavior.

• When she behaves like a bitch, you treat her like a bitch.
• When she behaves like a angel, you treat her like angel as long as you understand that she can switch to bitch on a dime – even when it’s not justified.

That’s fair and reasonable.

Any woman who has a problem with that is just looking to get treated like an angel while trying to get away with behaving like a bitch.

That’s NOT reasonable.

Personally, I simply refuse to absolve women of their own actions and behavior and say “oh that’s just her nature. She was born that way”. Forget it.

This is my personal approach and it has served me very well. As a result I don’t need to “think of women” as anything at all. I place that responsibility where it belongs — >> on HER.
/forums/topic/dear-mgtow-brothers-i-feel-better-and-i-thank-you/#post-357753

You can’t justify treating women “like a devil”, and ignore to your own detriment. But you can always justify treating her according to her own behavior. You can even justify rubbing her own nose in it with the same enthusiasm that you can treat her well for the kindness and courtesy she extends to you (if any).

What she is is up to her.
Not how a man perceives her.

As a man, I am actually able to put myself in other people’s shoes. And if I were a woman and a man said he would treat me according to my own behavior, I would be THRILLED. Now the rest is up to her. Only an extreme bitch would have a problem with that.

My narrative is from the perspective of an old man told to a young boy regarding a wife, marriage and the procreation of a child.

You can think you can make it into what you want. But, it is not about you.

A rock is what a rock is.
The sun is what the sun is.
Ignore their nature. It changes nothing about their nature.

I am not talking about an individual woman. I am not talking about accountability of a specific action.

I am merely hovering at fifty thousand feet and describing what is.

Don’t believe me, then marry a woman and impregnate her. Then watch. I am not talking about a cost versus benefit analysis. I am only talking about the nature of what is.

Peace brothers

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

In the past women nature does not matter much because there is no government to f~~~ things up.

If the women does not behave like an angel the man can just kick her out. She actually have to be responsible for herself, she have to put a minimum standard to prevent the man from kicking her out. Or acquire resources herself.

Don’t be naive and think she is married to you, she is actually married to URGGA the mightiest barbarian with nukes and guns. URGGA just f~~~ up all male slaves to provide resource to him and her.

Women are free to have a family without making the men signing the slave contract, why they don’t do that? Men are naive indeed to thing the marriage contract is making the love for him official. In truth, it is making the love for URGGA the barbarian with nukes official and roping in another slave as a tribute for URGGA to rule and enslave.

When you marry, you have an unofficial police station and tax office in the house. The house does not belong to you anymore.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DorkShit wrote:

I am merely hovering at fifty thousand feet and describing what is. Don’t believe me, then marry a woman and impregnate her. Then watch. I am not talking about a cost versus benefit analysis. I am only talking about the nature of what is.

Believe me when I tell you I understood what you meant. Some hand grenades are duds. They don’t *ALL* explode in your face. But you still have to a handle it like a grenade. I get it.

But @GregHonda encapsulated it…..

Greg Honda wrote:

Now I realise that just because its their nature at a primal level, it doesn’t mean they can’t rise above it and be better people. As a man my primal nature would lead me to hunt out and domminate females for my satisfaction and procreation, but society has evolved and I have to abide by the rules or suffer.

Bang on b~~~~ accurate.

Women can vote. Therefore they can think. A woman is not a hand grenade. She can choose to explode – or not. And because she can choose, I will hold her personally responsible for her s~~~ty second class behavior. It’s not “her nature” anymore. It’s a CHOICE.

( This isn’t a moral issue. It’s also a LEGAL issue. )

Greg Honda wrote:

Thats why I come here everyday. Every days a “School Day” here

God if I only learned this in school. Would have come in far more useful than MacBeth.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts