My nephew finds out his father is not his father

[Anonymous 3]

Father?

Did you mean “parent 1”?

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Untamed wrote:

His “father” could sue Child Support Enforcement and/or reclaim all the money he paid in C.S. It’s a very long shot but there’s not much else he can do.

He can try. Any judge will throw the case out because, while he was paying, the kid knew him as ” father” (in loco parentis) and feelings are more important. That and they already spent the money so at this point what difference does it make?

Situation sucks and it’s sadly at least 30% of the paternal relationships.

They can still have a rock solid paternal relationship based on Mutual deception, where the boy can learn from the man’s mistakes.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[SwimcatParticipant 3598]

It’s too late. The women is dead. There’s nothing can be done. Let it go.

[MonkParticipant 17038]

Anonymous wrote:

All through human history Female Nature has never changed. They trace bloodlines through the Mother because Paternity fraud has always been a problem.

Exactly. The ancients knew. That’s why Judaism is matrilineal.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

iMickey503 wrote:

What worries me is that as children, they are going to be made fun of that they did not have a mom.

Trust me. That is NOT going to happen. On the contrary, they will be envied for knowing their fathers is and benefiting from that relationship. That’s if there is any contact at all. I suspect that as men disconnect from women for reproduction, education will divide into two groups. The wretched spawn of deadbeat single mothers will fill the public schools to bursting, which will become even more like mere holding facilities instead of educational institutions. At the same time single fathers will be sending their children to private academies. The children of single fathers and the spawn of single mothers will rarely meet.

If DNA testing does follow through with being Mandatory?

That will NEVER happen. Female voters will not permit their child meal ticket scam to be jeopardized by facts like DNA results. Instead women are pushing hard for DNA testing to be made illegal without the woman’s consent and inadmissible in court.

It’s better to cut women out of your reproductive plans entirely, even if that means abandoning your reproductive plans.

Swimcat wrote:

It’s too late. The women is dead.

Her genes are alive.

There’s nothing can be done.

No. There is something that can be done. And should be done. He needs a vasectomy. He can’t kill his cheating whore of a mother, but he can still kill her genetic line. And free himself in the process.

[narwhalParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

That will NEVER happen. Female voters will not permit their child meal ticket scam to be jeopardized by facts like DNA results. Instead women are pushing hard for DNA testing to be made illegal without the woman’s consent and inadmissible in court.

I disagree on this. Women will gladly turn on other women if they fear they’ll lose their own meal tickets. Women were more than happy to support Trump for this reason. The reason mandatory DNA testing isn’t happening now is because it’s just not public news. But that can change. I imagine it probably will as a side effect of women wanting to know if the child has any defects and should be aborted.

I am normally against government intervention, but this is exactly the place where government is supposed to intervene. As pointed out, DNA testing prevents harm to men and children. Men can not safely question and ask for a DNA test without causing harm to their relationship with the mother, but government absolutely can. A DNA test should be required at birth (or beforehand) and for any child custody case if not already done. at birth.

Ok. Then do it.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Monk wrote:

Wizard’s Pupil wrote:

All through human history Female Nature has never changed. They trace bloodlines through the Mother because Paternity fraud has always been a problem.

Exactly. The ancients knew. That’s why Judaism is matrilineal.

There is one African society where the women have more than one husband and there is no presumption of paternity. The father figure in the child’s life in that tribe is the mother’s brother.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

sidecar wrote:

It’s better to cut women out of your reproductive plans entirely, even if that means abandoning your reproductive plans.

I’ve already told my oldest son that if he wants child(ren) of his own, that he should utilize a legal surrogate.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

narwhal wrote:

Women will gladly turn on other women if they fear they’ll lose their own meal tickets.

But how will DNA testing save women from losing their meal tickets? If it’s determined a man isn’t the biological father of a child, it’s more difficult for a woman to use that child to take his stuff. Female voters won’t tolerate that.

narwhal wrote:

As pointed out, DNA testing prevents harm to men and children.

The government, and women voters who support it, doesn’t give a f~~~ about harming men or children.

Government claims of “looking out for the children” is just newspeak for “maximizing the wealth transfer to women”.

[Author]

Posts