My experiment with Seeking Arrangement

[RedPillBonerParticipant 541]

So my 1 month experiment on the site Seeking Arrangement is over. In that month I did not meet one girl for any kind of an exchange. From the get go it did not sit well with me and I don’t know how men do it.

Most of the profiles are college girls that want to be “pampered” and “be your arm candy”.

I had a few brief conversations and almost met a young attractive girl for coffee. That is until she said she wanted 500 dollars allowance just for the meeting. Yea not gonna happen.

At first I thought I would be okay with paying for sex but I’m not. There’s something about a broad having to be paid to f~~~ them that just doesn’t turn me on.

There are lots of single mothers that want monthly “allowance”. Upwards of 3-4K a month for sex a few times a week. Who the f~~~ pays that?

Must be nice to be a c~~~. Just go on some website and next thing you know you are making 40K a year tax free, just from one guy. Just to put on a fake smile and f~~~ them once in a while.

F~~~ing pathetic.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I wonder what the sugar baby success rate is?

I think many PhD thesis in economic’s will be write about these trends.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

You should have told her you pay 500 for with blowjob and anal added on.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Give them nothing.
Porn and fleshlight work well.
I had to laugh about the single mothers wanting 3000 to 4000 month allowance. Still laughing. (Maybe offer them a quart of ice cream instead).
Wealthy guys hiring sugar babies don’t stay wealthy long. Damn. I can’t believe a man would hire a sugar baby.
I can’t wait for VR porn to come out. Women will really be worthless at that point

[Mr_OptionsParticipant 298]

I’ve seen that site. You have to be a upgraded member to message or email them for $70.00 per month. Not even worth it if it was free. Desperate c~~~s get free messages I believe.

A man without a woman is like a fish without a hook.

[Clockwork PenguinParticipant 50]

No disrespect intended but, I really don’t see how this is an issue.

When it comes to social networking and dating in the online field, it’s a pretty common assessment that us guys are nothing more than wallets with legs and women are nothing but (pardon my Marine Corps terminology) Walking Mattresses.

If your looking for a less skewed assessment, you’d have to go out and get your statistics by meeting and interacting with women in public or on the street. The simple fact that your utilizing an online source as your medium already puts a mask/filter on the type/nature of women you’ll be finding (and the type of men seeking them, for that matter). Yet even still, meeting said women on the street would still be a somewhat skewed assessment as your local environment would skew the results as well. Being a suit sporting business owner engaging in some meet and greets with women from a low class (“hood”) environment, sure, the women would mostly likely assume that they could sling there pussy at you in exchange for pulling there sorry asses out of the metaphorical gutter, rather than having to work to elevate there status on there own.

Personally, I don’t see why you even bother. If your looking to toss out a few bucks to get your dick wet, based on the numerical figures you’ve shown here, it seems that prostitutes would be a much better financial investment. And what’s even better is, said prostitutes would grab there s~~~ and get the f~~~ out of your house after you got your nut off. However, even that’s not required. If getting your dick wet is the end goal your seeking, I’m curious as to what the ingrained disconnect is, that has you convinced that a money for flesh transaction needs to occur. Only time I’m willing to spend cash for meat, is if I’m visiting my local butcher.

[RedPillBonerParticipant 541]

Clockwork Penguin wrote:

No disrespect intended but, I really don’t see how this is an issue.

When it comes to social networking and dating in the online field, it’s a pretty common assessment that us guys are nothing more than wallets with legs and women are nothing but (pardon my Marine Corps terminology) Walking Mattresses.

If your looking for a less skewed assessment, you’d have to go out and get your statistics by meeting and interacting with women in public or on the street. The simple fact that your utilizing an online source as your medium already puts a mask/filter on the type/nature of women you’ll be finding (and the type of men seeking them, for that matter). Yet even still, meeting said women on the street would still be a somewhat skewed assessment as your local environment would skew the results as well. Being a suit sporting business owner engaging in some meet and greets with women from a low class (“hood”) environment, sure, the women would mostly likely assume that they could sling there pussy at you in exchange for pulling there sorry asses out of the metaphorical gutter, rather than having to work to elevate there status on there own.

Personally, I don’t see why you even bother. If your looking to toss out a few bucks to get your dick wet, based on the numerical figures you’ve shown here, it seems that prostitutes would be a much better financial investment. And what’s even better is, said prostitutes would grab there s~~~ and get the f~~~ out of your house after you got your nut off. However, even that’s not required. If getting your dick wet is the end goal your seeking, I’m curious as to what the ingrained disconnect is, that has you convinced that a money for flesh transaction needs to occur. Only time I’m willing to spend cash for meat, is if I’m visiting my local butcher.

[/quote

It’s not an issue. I tried the site and shared my observation and opinion. No more no less. Don’t make it more than it is.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

RedPillBoner wrote:

There are lots of single mothers that want monthly “allowance”. Upwards of 3-4K a month for sex a few times a week.

Nah. Once they get you locked into 3-4K a month, the sex stops.

Who the f~~~ pays that?

Idiots who get locked in.

No marriage. No procreation. No cohabitation. No exceptions.

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

Almost sounds like it could degenerate into paying to be a cuck !

And those prices ? That is crazy !

I can set you up far cheaper by asking some Truckers I know. At those rates, no wonder I know a guy to flies out to Nevada every 3-4 months, it’s cheaper !

Besides, why pay thousands when women are a dime a dozen ?

Frank V.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

RedPillBoner wrote:

Most of the profiles are college girls that want to be “pampered” and “be your arm candy”

Most of the profiles are fat trailer park women in Alabama posting pictures of pretty college women.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Author]

Posts