My Child Is Not My Priority – Pussy Is.

[Anonymous 6]

This is the epitome of what we talk about here on this site. Men putting pussy above anything else. Yes, your child is your responsibility. That’s why its YOUR child. I cannot stand people like this who don’t have the common sense God gave a monkey to know right from wrong. These people don’t deserve the right to breed and definitely should not be putting pussy on a higher pedestal than raising your own child.

Thoughts??

[BigDParticipant 3024]

@venom

Sorry brother, I couldn’t watch all of it. Seems like they are just trying to justify bad behavior by showing even more bad behavior.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[Anonymous 6]

Yep they were. Can’t roll with that s~~~, but i thought i could at least bring the question to the forum

[Anonymous 3]

Its sad that a man would even think that way

[Anonymous 1]

These are not Men. They are perpetual juveniles. Really, sad to see how pussy has become the ONLY priority for so many. They will be 70 years old with no wisdom accumulated, still obsessed with getting that next piece of ass. What a pathetic waste of a life.

[HydroParticipant 164]

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, your child is your responsibility. That’s why its YOUR child

I disagree completely.

You own your body, the fruits of your labor, your money and possessions. No one has the right to steal your property.

Likewise, a child is not yours unless you agree it is yours. No one has the right to declare/dictate that some child is “yours” just because they say so. You do not have any legitimate responsibilities or obligations to anything you did not agree and consent to. To suggest that any other principle determines your responsibilities is a violation of your liberty and your sovereignty. Violating your liberty and your sovereignty is what tyrants do.

That’s what’s really going on here. Some group of manginas, feminists, politicians, tradcons, judges or whatever declare that a child is “yours” based on some animal husbandry standard, or whose sperm it was, or some other bulls~~~ that they dreamed up. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. It is a lie they conjured up to further their own self-interest and simultaneously deny and violate your liberty and your sovereignty. It’s the same old bulls~~~ to keep men yoked on the plantation. Don’t buy into it.

[WraithParticipant 97]

Hydro wrote:

Likewise, a child is not yours unless you agree it is yours. No one has the right to declare/dictate that some child is “yours” just because they say so. You do not have any legitimate responsibilities or obligations to anything you did not agree and consent to. To suggest that any other principle determines your responsibilities is a violation of your liberty and your sovereignty. Violating your liberty and your sovereignty is what tyrants do.

Children don’t ask to be born, with the exception of “sperm jacking” the contributing DNA originators are responsible for the end result of their interaction, condoms, abstinence and a vasectomy are real world options.

[HermitParticipant]

Wraith wrote:

Hydro wrote:

Likewise, a child is not yours unless you agree it is yours. No one has the right to declare/dictate that some child is “yours” just because they say so. You do not have any legitimate responsibilities or obligations to anything you did not agree and consent to. To suggest that any other principle determines your responsibilities is a violation of your liberty and your sovereignty. Violating your liberty and your sovereignty is what tyrants do.

Children don’t ask to be born, with the exception of “sperm jacking” the contributing DNA originators are responsible for the end result of their interaction, condoms, abstinence and a vasectomy are real world options.

I agree. Even if you did not intend to get her pregnant, if you have sex with a woman and a child is born, that’s your child and your responsibility, unless maybe as you say, you were jacked. What kind of a man could abandon his own child?

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[HydroParticipant 164]

Wraith wrote:

with the exception of “sperm jacking” the contributing DNA originators are responsible for the end result of their interaction

Not true.

Exhibit #1: sperm donors. The very same legal system that you apparently defer to and have adopted your ethical stance in this topic from have passed numerous laws establishing the principle that being the “DNA originator” is NOT the guiding principle at all. The aforementioned laws establish the legal standard that a sperm donor is not obligated in any way to act in the capacity of a father or to provide financial support to a woman who has a child using his contributing DNA.

Exhibit #2: Any woman who gets pregnant or has a child is clearly a “contributing DNA originator. But once again, the very same legal system has established the principle that she is not responsible for the end result of her interactions. She can have an abortion or she can just drop off the baby at any fire station with no questions asked and no obligations or responsibilities on her whatsoever.

[HydroParticipant 164]

Hermit wrote:

if you have sex with a woman and a child is born, that’s your child and your responsibility

see Exhibit #2 above. As I pointed out, a woman is given the legal right to have sex with anyone she wants, and without any obligations or financial responsibilities on her whatsoever. That’s the established legal principle. So are you advocating for one set of laws for women with all rights and no responsibilities, and a totally different set of laws for men with no rights only responsibilities?

[WraithParticipant 97]

Hydro wrote:

Exhibit #1: sperm donors. The very same legal system that you apparently defer to and have adopted your ethical stance in this topic from have passed numerous laws establishing the principle that being the “DNA originator” is NOT the guiding principle at all. The aforementioned laws establish the legal standard that a sperm donor is not obligated in any way to act in the capacity of a father or to provide financial support to a woman who has a child using his contributing DNA.

It is a moral standpoint… people should take responsibility for their actions pure and simple, if you don’t want offspring, get the snip, use condoms religiously OR abstain, there is quite a difference from donating DNA material to a sperm bank and having sexual intercourse with a woman.

I agree it is unfair that at the point of coitus men lose all rights to their genetic material that however doesn’t change the fact that everyone IS responsible for their actions.

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

Thoughts??

It’s not a man’s child anymore, neither is the family, that’s all been destroyed by gynocentrism. Men have no reproductive rights whatsoever, in spite the genetic material being half his.

I don’t blame them for abandoning the woman’s child, that’s the way the chips fall for rearranging every facet of society while not including men. Just like Rudolph the red nose rain-deer, we’ve been excluded from all the rain-deer games!

I threw away the woman so I’m not forced by law and order to throw away the family and children that subsequently cum with them, surrendering them to the hive-state by full force of the law.

My only reproductive rights are to not participate.

This society is ATROCIOUS beyond comprehension!

[HydroParticipant 164]

Wraith wrote:

It is a moral standpoint

OK, now we’re getting somewhere. Since you say your position is based on morals, I think it’s only reasonable for you to describe this morals system of yours. What are its foundations and tenets? What rights do humans have in your morality system? How are those rights derived? In your morality system are human rights endowed by nature/God (as stated in the Declaration of Independence)? Are these human rights unalienable?

Or, alternatively in your morality system are human rights something that can simply be awarded to an individual or a selected group? In your morality system can human rights be denied to an individual or a selected group? And in your morality who does the awarding or denying of human rights? Is it an individual (such as a dictator) or a group of humans (such as a government)?

Wraith wrote:

people should take responsibility for their actions pure and simple

I’m not buying that you actually believe that. In Exhibit #2 I laid out the evidence where people have sex which results in a child being born, and with the full knowledge and approval of the current legal system these people have no responsibility for their actions whatsoever, financial or otherwise. They can simply drop the newborn child off at a fire station permanently washing there hands of any responsibility.

You did not address this at all. You conveniently ignored it which leads me to believe that you agree with it. Which, if true, leads me to believe you’re full of s~~~ when you claim you believe that “people should take responsibility for their actions pure and simple.”

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

My problem is all the people trying to make their children my responsibility. Especially every April 15th.

If I wanted to pay for children, I would have had some of my own. So why the f~~~ am I responsible for everyone else’s?

[HydroParticipant 164]

@sidecar
women believe that because they have a womb they are the gatekeepers of the human race, that they have the unfettered right to reproduce, and that s~~~ting out their womb turds is some notable accomplishment.

women use what influence and power they have – voting, sexual, appeal for protection – to manipulate the manginas running most governments to cater to women’s reproduction whims, with the result being that governments impose taxes on men to pay for women and their children.

[HermitParticipant]

Hydro wrote:

Hermit wrote:

if you have sex with a woman and a child is born, that’s your child and your responsibility

see Exhibit #2 above. As I pointed out, a woman is given the legal right to have sex with anyone she wants, and without any obligations or financial responsibilities on her whatsoever. That’s the established legal principle. So are you advocating for one set of laws for women with all rights and no responsibilities, and a totally different set of laws for men with no rights only responsibilities?

I’m saying, as Wraith stated, that morally the man and woman should accept the responsibility for the child which came about as a direct result of their actions.

Hydro wrote:

Wraith wrote:

It is a moral standpoint

Wraith wrote:

people should take responsibility for their actions pure and simple

I’m not buying that you actually believe that. In Exhibit #2 I laid out the evidence where people have sex which results in a child being born, and with the full knowledge and approval of the current legal system these people have no responsibility for their actions whatsoever, financial or otherwise. They can simply drop the newborn child off at a fire station permanently washing there hands of any responsibility.

You did not address this at all. You conveniently ignored it which leads me to believe that you agree with it. Which, if true, leads me to believe you’re full of s~~~ when you claim you believe that “people should take responsibility for their actions pure and simple.”

People should do a lot of things that they do not.

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Anonymous wrote:

This is the epitome of what we talk about here on this site. Men putting pussy above anything else.

Disagree with you however it is not on the idea of men putting pussy before everything else but the legal climate behind it.

When it comes to children men have no f~~~ing choice in this society as we cannot force women to abort the baby without going to prison and the semen goes from c~~~ to c~~~ it is all over when it comes to fathers rights. So if i have fatherhood forced down my throat why would i create the kid the priority of my life even thou i have no choice in the matter?

Why should i support the kid i had no choice in over getting drunk, high, f~~~ing, smoking and most importantly of all completing my own personal mission in life? If i had any choice i could say i want an abortion whether it be finanicial or literal thereby i am the one responsible but i do not have a choice so if a woman gets pregnant by me i am f~~~ed in that manner (the f~~~ing government will hound my ass for at least 18 years if not possibly more if she decides to collect on it).

If i have the choice i am responsible if i do not have the choice i am not responsible and the only choice id have is sexual position.

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, your child is your responsibility. That’s why its YOUR child.

Biologically if proven with a test the child is created with my genetic material but it is not my choice whether or not to have the child. If it was my choice then id be responsible since it is my child but since i am not i am not responsible for it.

Wraith wrote:

condoms, abstinence and a vasectomy are real world options.

Condoms suck but better then nothing, abstinence is religious bulls~~~ which does not work and i am not getting surgery on my genitals. You are forgetting female birth control exists and i will just demand prove (not their word) that the bitch is on birth control before f~~~ing her or i will simply not raise the kid in the slightest (if the law comes after me then f~~~ them as i have no goddamn money).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[HydroParticipant 164]

Hermit wrote:

I’m saying, as Wraith stated, that morally the man and woman should accept the responsibility for the child which came about as a direct result of their actions.

Sex is not consent to parenthood. Conception is not irreversible. The reality is that, after conception has occurred, a woman has multiple options by which she may alter and influence the course of events. She may (1) carry to term and raise the child, (2) carry to term and put the child up for adoption, (3) give custody to the father, (4) abort prior to birth, (5) drop the newborn of at a hospital or fire station. Conception itself creates no obligation for her to choose any of these paths. Any option she does choose if of her own free will.

Likewise, conception itself creates no obligation for a man to pay for any of these choices which are completely beyond his control. Any decision after that point is beyond his control, thus no responsibility can be attributed to the man. Biology is not fair. Only women can become pregnant. This means women get all the control and bear all the responsibility for their decisions. The man has no power to choose. Those without power (no choice) cannot be morally responsible.

[Author]

Posts