Muslims may accomplish what Hitler couldn't

[X11Spectator 4520]

500 years ago Christians were what muslim jihadists are today.

We then demoted theocracy and removed them from power and began to flourish and take over modernity.

When religion ruled the west, Muslims were actually quiet advanced societies, the our religious zealots killed them.

[OneTrueMisfitSpectator 2690]

https://carm.org/are-roman-catholics-christian

Don't care

[X11Spectator 4520]

So getting married is against Christianity???

Im sure that’s a broadly accepted doctrine…not.

[bladeParticipant]

This is really intresting

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

blade wrote:

This is really intresting

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/HsJHDxaLt1g?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Funny how it is only white “Christian” nations that are being forced to diversify. You don’t see whites growing in population in muslim (intentionally not capitalized – no respect earned) or Asian countries…
Listening to that old liberal cuck talk about a past that never existed, as if European nations were never a solid majority of white people, what a f~~~ing clueless, lying, sack of s~~~ idiot.

Thanks for posting that Blade.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

God gave everyone free will–those who reject God are at liberty to do so and I have no problem with that. I’m Catholic, but old school Catholic–the modern church is a travesty.

But all of that and the attempts at equating ALL religions is nonsense. They are not all the same. Islam has been at war with EVERYONE ever since its creation. There is no reason to believe they will ever stop. Hell they are at war and been at war with each other since the death of Mohamed. So the question of religion, or political philosophy is largely academic.

The plain fact is that western civilization has been under assault from the muslims for 1300 years. As I have said MANY times before: in order to deal with them we have three choices:

a) submit to them—and I would say to our atheist brothers that means YOU submit as well or face death
b) Contain them–exclude them from our societies for our own protection OR
c) annihilate them once and for all. (I know there is the meme–BUT NOT ALL Muslims are terrorist—my answer–maybe but the murder and terror inflicted is done in the name of islam which means if you are a musilm this is being done in YOUR NAME whether you are a terrorist or not—thus muslims who are not terrorists have an obligation to oppose murder being committed in their name OR they must be considered sympathizers and supporters and thus enemies.

[X11Spectator 4520]

I’m skeptical, if was no oil in the ME I doubt we would know Islam existed.

Give up our oil habit.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

OneTrueMisfit wrote:

1Co 7:38 So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.

Selectively quoting verses isn’t going to save you.
The verse endorses marriage contract, and says that fathers need to support THE DAUGHTERS WHO CANNOT FIND A SUITABLE HUSBAND.
It’s a verse basically promoting hypergamy.

Marriage contract is a duty for christian men.

Try to find a similar verse with HIM and not HER…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

X11 wrote:

500 years ago Christians were what muslim jihadists are today.

We then demoted theocracy and removed them from power and began to flourish and take over modernity.

When religion ruled the west, Muslims were actually quiet advanced societies, the our religious zealots killed them.

That is complete fiction.

Read up on the Ottoman Empire’s (Muslim) invasion and destruction of the Byzantine Empire (Christian) and the destruction of Constantinople. The invasion and defeat of Hungary and the killing of the Hungarian King, and the invasion and attack of Vienna.

This fiction of sweet peaceful Muslims who fell victim to the violent and evil west 500 years ago, is just that, FICTION.

They invaded and tried to conquer Europe and eventually were defeated. Hopefully history will repeat itself.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

X11 wrote:

So getting married is against Christianity???

Im sure that’s a broadly accepted doctrine…not.

Corinthians 7:38 affirms that hypergamy is good, and that if a woman doesn’t find a suitable husband then she shouldn’t be forced to marry an husband who isn’t good enough, and the father have the duty to support her.
There isn’t something similar regarding men.

Further proof that tradcons aren’t a lesser enemy compared to feminists.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[HitmanParticipant]

this is a Catholic crucifix.
it aint Ronald f~~~ing Macdonald hanging on it…
so if you actually believe Catholics are not christian,
i have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn..

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Hitman wrote:

this is a Catholic crucifix.
it aint Ronald f~~~ing Macdonald hanging on it…
so if you actually believe Catholics are not christian,
i have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn..

Are you really trying to argue with a person who alleged that a verse commanding fathers to support unmarried daughters (daughters, not sons) is a pro-MGTOW verse?
The same person who opened a thread about women being happier while being in the kitchen and not studying.
We have a lot of tradcons in mislead.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[OneTrueMisfitSpectator 2690]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Corinthians 7:38 affirms that hypergamy is good, and that if a woman doesn’t find a suitable husband then she shouldn’t be forced to marry an husband who isn’t good enough, and the father have the duty to support her.
There isn’t something similar regarding men.

Interesting interpretation there.. a false one but interesting

Context! Context! Context! Do you know what context is?

The sum of the whole discussion amounts to this — that celibacy is better than marriage, because it has more liberty, so that persons can serve God with greater freedom; but at the same time, that no necessity ought to be imposed, so as to make it unlawful for individuals to marry,

Don't care

[IRuleMeParticipant]

OneTrueMisfit wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Corinthians 7:38 affirms that hypergamy is good, and that if a woman doesn’t find a suitable husband then she shouldn’t be forced to marry an husband who isn’t good enough, and the father have the duty to support her.
There isn’t something similar regarding men.

Interesting interpretation there.. a false one but interesting

Context! Context! Context! Do you know what context is?

The sum of the whole discussion amounts to this — that celibacy is better than marriage, because it has more liberty, so that persons can serve God with greater freedom; but at the same time, that no necessity ought to be imposed, so as to make it unlawful for individuals to marry,

Hate to break it to you since I know you love the whole “context” argument, but as we’ve discussed already, the entire bible is already out of context. It was out of context before it was even printed for the masses.

Secondly.. There is no such thing as freedom when your will is to serve another. That’s not freedom at all. That’s mind slavery. You simply can’t take that out context. For a guy who talks about “context” you sure do spend a lot of time cherry picking verses that suit your argument. When frankly, (as if the bible isn’t filled with enough contradictions) one can easily throw up 10 or 15 verses that contradict yours.

Do yourself a favor. Put the book down, and pick up Mother Goose. There’s as much to be learned in that as there is the bible. And Mother Goose isn’t asking someone to bend their will and be submissive. As long as you’re living your life for someone else, esp for the judgement and service of someone else, then you are NOT free. The only master you should be serving is yourself. Anything less is slavery and there’s only one place for slaves. The plantation. Are you a MAN going your OWN way? Or a man going GOD’s way?

Cognitive Dissonance really does make people believe and do weird s~~~.

And for the record, Moses is a terrible f~~~ing navigator. Oh but he had God directing him. What does that say about God then?

Let’s be gracious and say 10 days. I’m willing to concede a month, given he had a massive caravan of people with him. Forty years wandering around like a clueless putz. That’s what Moses was.

[X11Spectator 4520]

China will save the world from muzzy take over.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

OneTrueMisfit wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Corinthians 7:38 affirms that hypergamy is good, and that if a woman doesn’t find a suitable husband then she shouldn’t be forced to marry an husband who isn’t good enough, and the father have the duty to support her.
There isn’t something similar regarding men.

Interesting interpretation there.. a false one but interesting

Context! Context! Context! Do you know what context is?

The sum of the whole discussion amounts to this — that celibacy is better than marriage, because it has more liberty, so that persons can serve God with greater freedom; but at the same time, that no necessity ought to be imposed, so as to make it unlawful for individuals to marry,

Are you a woman?
The verse says HER, not HIM.
Celibacy refers to MEN, not to women.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

X11 wrote:

China will save the world from muzzy take over.

Then tradcons will complain about the Chinese takeover.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts