Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Milo is done.
This topic contains 43 replies, has 29 voices, and was last updated by
Keymaster 2 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
This, nuff said, lol…
InRedPillWeTrust wrote:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/8a/04/02/8a0402ea23174b0c28b71c004dd7337b.jpg
They got him. Holy f~~~.Indeed….one of ‘them’…Well we already knew he was Jewish so…….
And it’s not antisemitic to state the obvious fact that Jews do actually rule the world.
Right.
Just peeking quickly at wikipedia, there are a number of states where one can marry at age 14 with parental permission (since minors can’t legally enter contract). So I suppose the MSM is stating that this is wrong, too? I’m sure there’s going to be a rush to change these laws any second now.
My culture – Jewish – says you’re an adult at 13. Our cousins – the Arabs – marry even younger. One of Mohammed’s wives was either nine or ten when she married. Marriageable age typically in a culture relates most closely to mortality ages as well as familial wealth, although not always the way one might think.
11 and 12 y/o midshipmen used to lead charges across crowded line-of-battle ships in the Napoleonic Wars. I myself see much of what’s wrong with our society, along with the whole snowflake thing, as delayed adolescence. Part of that is a parasitic attempt to commoditize education; part of it is to reduce the power of the young; part of it is to keep people out of the overcrowded labor force for as long as possible.
From my read, Milo was definitely taken at least partially out of context, and had a fairly defensible position. I’m very surprised that he resigned from Breitbart, and not at all surprised that Simon & Schuster (sp?) cut him loose.
I’m a little confused as to the condemnation here. While I myself have zero desire for a child bride, as I find “adult” women stupid and juvenile enough, I’m not sure why anyone would be particularly bothered by this, particularly on this web site. No, rational men don’t usually want to date teenagers, because teenagers are idiots. But lots of countries on the planet have zero problems with this, Western civilization had zero problems with this until fantastically recently, and every single major religion have no – and I mean NO – prohibition against marrying anyone who’s reached menarche.
The left is using pedophilia to attack Milo, the same way that feminists use any number of similar bulls~~~ weapons – domestic violence charges, false rape accusations, alimony indentures, etc. – to attack men. Milo slept with older men while he was a teen, and doesn’t think that’s a big deal. Lots of girls in my high school slept with boys in their early to late teens. I didn’t have a problem with that then, and don’t particularly have a problem with it now. Some were dating college students, so I suppose statutory rape was going on. Zero s~~~s given.
Every high school in the US – and I mean every is constantly aware of technical statutory rapes continually going on, all the time. This often happens in particular when girls at age 17 are dating men of age 19. Larger spreads also occur.
No, I’m defending Milo completely on this, and trashing the 21st century creepy focus on “pedophilia” from people who’ve never read a history book. Marriage ages are generally raised when there are lots and lots of unmarried older women who don’t want competition. That’s what’s been happening in the States for the past thirty or forty years.
This is why increasing cultures around the world basically feel the West can go f~~~ itself. Can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but . . . it’s completely f~~~ing Eurocentric – and historically illiterate – to take the position on “pedophilia” that current feminists like to take.
Honestly, what bothers me the most about this is the lack of people defending Milo. What cowards. What cravens. F~~~ the 21st century West. F~~~ it. If this is the best conservatism has to offer – abandoning one of it’s most stalwart champions – then the West is f~~~ing doomed. What absolute goddamn cowardice. One comment, one chat, taken clearly out of context, expurgiated (sp?), edited, abridged, and this man’s career is over? Even if one completely disagreed with Milo (and I don’t) – one, single comment ruins a man’s career?
No, f~~~ the West. Muslims around the world are laughing at the West’s defenders of Islam scourging someone based on their acceptance of Muslim (and Jewish, and Earth’s) normal ages of consent. F~~~ the West. If the right won’t defend Milo, then I am just f~~~ing done. Let Fukushima kill everyone; let a superflu spread, let the scattered wings of Michael loose their viral contents on this hypocritical, evil world. Milo is getting screwed because he had the b~~~~ to fight feminism and leftism for several years in a way no one else would – that’s it.
If everyone must believe all things correctly at all times, and never ever ever say anything wrong, ever, then the West is f~~~ing finished, and good goddamn riddance.
"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."
Self publish and throw it up on Amazon. Ivanka’s perfume is #1 on amazon after the corporate fascists dropped it.
there are a number of states where one can marry at age 14
This is a valid point and must be bolded for emphasis because western countries have the highest age of consent. And even in western countries – where the age of consent is 18 – you still get pregnant teens. Like Sarah Palin’s pregnant underage daughter for example.
So when -18 teen has sex with anyone of their choice, it’s acceptable and even legal across the world. We also know this by the Charlotte Rampling’s movie “Heading South” which is about American women in their 40s, 50s, 60s and beyond endorsing sex tourism and having sex with Jamaican teenage boys because these women are – QUOTE – “looking for love wherever they can find it”.
The New York Times wrote about the droves of women at the theaters who als made comments like “I WAS HOPING TO SEE MORE SEX!!!!”
Does that make her a “pedophile”?
Of course not. She’s just “looking for love wherever she can find it”.It’s just not legal in certain states and countries.
They are just GARGANTUAN hypocrites.Left this in another thread on the topic and dropping it here too…..
I didn’t listen to / follow Milo much. I tried, but whenever I saw those chaotic campus videos with all the noise , shouting , and conflict, I promptly turn them off. I just don’t like that kind of behavior, feminists screaming into a camera etc… But I did watch him for about 15 minutes with Bill Maher – just a couple of days ago.
He’s clearly a shock-jock and admits to it being a prime motivator.
I also saw the video of George Takei laughing and “joking” (on Howard Stern) about how he was jerked off by an older man when he was 13 which wasn’t taken seriously as “abuse”, so I don’t really see the difference here. Except, when you’re trying to “do the right thing” and lead by example, you MUST remain consistent.
So resigning was the right thing to do to preserve Brietbart’s integrity.
Apart from Milo……
It seems to be everywhere that “comedians” (i.e Schumer) and celebrities want to be taken seriously on politics… and then they often turn around and say they were “just joking”. Very convenient. Either they are “just joking”, or they are NOT joking. But the moment it’s a “joke” / funny / ha ha , they can’t expect to be taken seriously anymore.
• Amy Schumer makes a declaration about moving to Canada if Trump wins
• Says she was “just joking”.
• Releases another statement expecting to be taken seriously.Please. She’s should just stick to slut jokes.
In fact, Amy “Worst Human” Schemer begins her stand up set “joking” about sleeping with her high-school crush…and how he now wants her to go to his graduation. Applause and laughter follow.
So either it’s “funny”, or it’s NOT funny.
Milo’s retraction was still a better move than other political / media personalities, who don’t even have THE B~~~~ to admit they were wrong. The BIG difference between Milo and ALL the useful idiots is that he holds integrity as a virtue.
“Integrity” is the opposite of hypocrisy. Those who hold integrity as a virtue expect hypocrites to account for their discrepancies or alter their beliefs. Milo’s integrity is important to him – more important than his “job” – hence the retraction and resignation was the only right thing to do. It rewards more than any $250K book deal.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
