Might as well start them young, I guess

[HammerdownParticipant 528]

A great bit from our collective surrogate dad, Tom Leykis. It does look long at first, but you will be able to get the meat and potatoes in this story within ten minutes.

Basically a homeless man was released after eight months in prison. He was in jail because three 11 year old girls claimed he stalked and physically attacked them. One of the girls later admitted to making the whole ordeal up. Why did they accuse him of this, you ask? Because they WERE RUNNING LATE FOR SCHOOL AND DIDN’T WANT TO GET IN TROUBLE. That’s right sports fans, as early as eleven women are learning to throw men under the bus because they don’t feel like taking responsibility for their actions.

If you have time I recommend checking out more of the video, at least the first half hour or so. Tom gets the (female) deputy district attorney overseeing the case on the air and grills her about why the names of the three 11 year olds are being withheld, since it’s now known for a fact that they are not the victims of a crime. This is a YouTube video of a phone conversation that happened thousands of kilometers away from me and I can still hear her hamster wheel spinning.

The future is cancelled, boys. Save yourselves.

[RennieParticipant]

So much for the idea that kids don’t lie about this stuff. Myth busted.

[QcummerParticipant 652]

what’s the normal procedure with people under 18 as far as releasing names?

[Anonymous 5]

Qcummer wrote:

what’s the normal procedure with people under 18 as far as releasing names?

In Canada, criminals under 18 cannot be named at all.

Victims under 18 cannot be published in any news/media without the parents and courts consent first. They are also protected.

I don’t know about the USA.

 

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

The follow-up was reported in the Chicago Tribune.

Long story short: Cops took the girls out of school in handcuffs. The first girl picked the homeless man, Eric Nordmark, out of a line-up and then coached her two friends to pick the same guy. And, of course, the mom and attorney of one of the girls insists on making it sound like the girls are the real victim EVEN AFTER they admitted to lying.

 

This s~~~ scares me, not f~~~ing joke.

[IAmTheVillainParticipant 6]

Scary. And it’s only the beginning. When a new way of doing something becomes available, the extremes need to be exhausted before you arrive at a reasonable, debatable middle ground. My middle school students, when they reach 14, something clicks in their heads, and they suddenly become little s~~~s. Most of em. The worst ones always push the limit until they push it so far that something bad happens to them, and they realise the limit. After that they can be negotiated with, and from their they become more reasonable until they become adults. This somewhat new concept of male scapegoating on this scale has got to get much worse before it gets any better.

[Elgos_GrimParticipant 254]

I think a law schould be implemented to deal with false accusals, that carries a similar sentence to the crime they were accusing someone of, that would probably get peple to think twice about this kind of bulls~~~.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Elgos_Grim wrote:

I think a law schould be implemented to deal with false accusals, that carries a similar sentence to the crime they were accusing someone of, that would probably get peple to think twice about this kind of bulls~~~.

I believe it would.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Same thing happened at the Salem witch trials. Ditto the “child molestation” panic in the 1980s in the US.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[JasonParticipant 282]

@elgos_grim I agree wholeheartedly! When running the risk of getting jailtime equivalent to the purported crime, people would definitely start thinking twice about making up false allegations!

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[Author]

Posts