Men Identifying as Polyamorous to Avoid Commitment

[AFTParticipant 2726]

743 roadmaster wrote:

“In the past six months alone, four men I’ve dated have used this as a way of masking their attempts to shirk commitment, and tried to pressure me into agreeing to an arrangement I had no interest in.”

So you expect a monogamous commitment when you’re out being stuffed full of infinite c~~~s, it’s like that poster in the archives:

/poster/trust/

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

Why the hell would I want or need to identify as polyamorous (a total win for the woman as it allows her to have free access to all the c~~~ she wants while the beta cuck picks over the scraps) when I have a far more effective option available for avoiding “commitment”.

I identify as poor.

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

Hahaha brilliant find!. I like how gyow is ‘pathetic’ and they try to shame us or call us women haters, these guys are playing the pua game but they’re hiding behind left tactics to pump and dump. I love it when women lose unearned value, they do nothing to contribute and when their natural powers are gone such as this or the wall, they bitch bitch bitch.
They hate MGTOW because we don’t want to be slaves to women and when these guys say they love women so much they want them all, they moan as well lol.
Looking forward to more news like this, men adapting, surviving and thriving just as always. We fought and died in countless bloodshed wars, we will win the gender wars by leaving the battlefield.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Branched offParticipant 11011]

BritGHOW wrote:

Why the hell would I want or need to identify as polyamorous (a total win for the woman as it allows her to have free access to all the c~~~ she wants while the beta cuck picks over the scraps) when I have a far more effective option available for avoiding “commitment”.

Great insight there. Thanks. Polyamory is just the evolution of the c~~~ carousel. If you want to ride the carousel and if you want to be a pony on that carousel it is a useful tool as it cuts the crap. Its a very blue pilled thing though.

If I wanted to “shame” a modern western woman (Which frankly I can’t be bothered to do). I would not say I wanted a polyamourous relationship. I would say “You are a c~~~ stuffed slut, I can see why men are only offering you part time commitment but personally I think you are used goods damaged beyond sale value, prove me wrong if you like, I would respect you for it, but I think you are not fit for a man’s love”

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Red KnightParticipant 720]

“In the past six months alone, four men I’ve dated have used this as a way of masking their attempts to shirk commitment, and tried to pressure me into agreeing to an arrangement I had no interest in.”

4 guys in 6 months, eh? Out of how many?

Formerly MoneyOverBitches

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

How about men identifying as “don’t give a f~~~” to avoid bulls~~~ in general?

I was at a bar last night having drinks with a couple of guy friends. I picked up my phone to look up a point we’d been discussing and just as I unlocked it, I got a text message from a girl of a topless picture of herself she’d just taken.

My rsponse: “Slow night, huh?”

She sent a few more pictures and I ignored them, looked up the info I wanted and put my phone away.

Whatever she was after, I don’t give a f~~~. Simple.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Polyamory… hmmmm.

Might be fun having blond, redhead, brunette and Asian females all in the same bed.

The most I’ve had at the same time is 2 women, and I’ve done that 6 or 7 times in the past, be fun to have more than 2 women for a change.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

BritGHOW wrote:

Why the hell would I want or need to identify as polyamorous (a total win for the woman as it allows her to have free access to all the c~~~ she wants while the beta cuck picks over the scraps) when I have a far more effective option available for avoiding “commitment”.

I identify as poor.

It only works in the mans favour if he doesn’t enter into a relationship at any costs.

The guys doing this have a few women on rotation as f~~~ buddies anyway, so if one woman decides to leave, they couldn’t give a f~~~ because they haven’t put all their eggs into one basket.

The worst scenario for the man is to become Polyamorous when they are in a relationship. Then it just becomes cuckoldry under a different name.

[narwhalParticipant]

So basically, she is ok with poly, but not for her. She is ok with guys who want to date around, but not for her. However, she is p~~~ed because guys are claiming poly when the want to date around. Did she realize that it’s the same result for her…a no go?

I agree though, the whole is dumb. I have no interested in shaming a woman by pretending to be more progressive then her. I don’t care. And I really don’t have an interest in dating more than one woman at a time. In the vast majority of cases, one is too many.

Ok. Then do it.

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

Here is what is so stupid about this article… A man either wants commitment or he does not. It seems the polyamorous types are being honest about what commitment they are into (none) so the questions becomes what would tis bitch prefer? For them to lie and say they want commitment when they do not? That it would be better for me to lie to a woman, say I want to marry her and then walk away? That would be her preference? Her complaint doesn’t even make sense.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

I avoid commitment by being an asshole, driving a burned out pinto and asking her to give me money.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

“There is a clear difference between a polyamorous person saying they’re polyamorous on the first date, and a guy who just doesn’t want to settle down using it as a shield to hide behind.”

Yeah, there’s a difference: the female idea of “polyamorous” is:

I have access to multiple wallets

The male idea of “polyamorous” is:

I’m gonna f~~~ing multiple women without having to commit

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Just find another gem
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/metoo-consent-dating-campaign-sexism-marital-rape-sexual-assault-a8180966.html

Consent doesn’t end with dating – husbands have to ask their wives for sex too

Yeah, kiss my ass: I have 5 fleshlights and I’m not going to sign another marriage contract, you can go to hell.
Nor even my son isn’t going to sign a marriage contract. NEVER.
Game over.
You may ask consent to yourself, c~~~.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Yeah, there’s a difference: the female idea of “polyamorous” is:

I have access to multiple wallets

The male idea of “polyamorous” is:

I’m gonna f~~~ing multiple women without having to commit

That is it!!
Whoring by the numbers.
10 c~~~s at 5% at of their income or 2 c~~~s at 100% of their income.
It’s just economics.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

FrostByte wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Yeah, there’s a difference: the female idea of “polyamorous” is:

I have access to multiple wallets

The male idea of “polyamorous” is:

I’m gonna f~~~ing multiple women without having to commit

That is it!!
Whoring by the numbers.
10 c~~~s at 5% at of their income or 2 c~~~s at 100% of their income.
It’s just economics.

The last relationship I had, it ended late August/early september 2016, was with a woman, postal clerk, who also had sex with the female director of her post office.
The correct name for that isn’t “polyamory”, it’s “hypergamy”: she was f~~~ing both me and her boss, the differences between a standard cuck and me were just only:
1- her boss was a woman, so she was open about it, knowing that a man isn’t going to be jealous of a woman (at a point she actually even alleged that the threesomes ww had were exclusively her merit: that was quite offensive for me).
2- I didn’t commit, I gave her nothing, I actually left her when she insisted to begin a cohabitation with me (in my house, of course, she owns a house but it’s smaller than mine)

Question: who is the new deputy director of the local post office, right now?
Answer: my ex, due she still please her director.
Difference being that now she keeps out of the thing her new man.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts