Marriage is more beneficial for men

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

HAHA, look what the Telegraph Tards are feeding down blue pill throat:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11668417/Marriage-is-more-beneficial-for-men-than-women-study-shows.html

Sorry bitches, but marriage is at an all time low, and nothing you do will stop it from declining. Plus i daresay that marriage is not beneficial for men, not financially, not in health. Just the stress alone would kill me in 2 years.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Landmark research by University College London, the London School of Economics and The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

If they had spent 0.1% of their time looking up the word beneficial they might have come up with a different conclusion.

Look into my crystal ball, I can tell that next year new “research” will show that men paying vaginamony are much happier than men who have never been married. And men who lost more than 50% in divorce live much longer than men who only lost 49%. Men who allow their wives to ride the c~~~ carousel and paying child support for children who are not biologically related to them will never get ill and will outlive the sun.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

To keep the lie going, they have to keep lying.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Well, the article got at least a glimpse of it right:

““Surprisingly, those men who divorced in their late 30s and did not subsequently remarry, were less likely to suffer from conditions related to diabetes in early middle age compared to those who were married.””

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Correlation does not mean causation. Married men living longer is not because marriage has magical health benefits. It does not. Women tend to choose healthier mates and wealthier mates. These are men who will already live longer and can afford to eat right, better health care and/or health insurance. Men who commit suicide after divorce are counted as single, which is bulls~~~. There is no direct proof that marriage improves health and life expectancy.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Here is a question regarding the MGTOWsphere. Is there really opposition to marriage or to divorce? What I see in a lot of complaints is how much a guy gets ripped off by the divorce process. That is where a lot of men going MGTOW have had. The rest is over nagging in relationships, and denied what you really want to do., but the rest is on the divorce laws.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[sidecarParticipant 35851]

Then why is male life expectancy increasing to catch up with female life expectancy while the marriage rate is collapsing?

[MalfunctionNeedInputParticipant 257]

Where was the proof backed up by their research. I read a bunch of baseless claims…Smells like bulls~~~ after all I’ve seen.

Also, why am I healthier now than I was before divorce and feel better about myself, eat better and less….hmmm. Although I’m just one man.

The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity. --Einstein

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

“Numerous studies have found that married people have better health than unmarried people,” added Dr George Ploubidis.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

lol

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[AttonParticipant]

Lol they should tell that to the men who are paying a million dollars a year of vagina support.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[RoyDalParticipant]

uchibenkei wrote:

Correlation does not mean causation. Married men living longer is not because marriage has magical health benefits. It does not. Women tend to choose healthier mates and wealthier mates. These are men who will already live longer and can afford to eat right, better health care and/or health insurance. Men who commit suicide after divorce are counted as single, which is bulls~~~. There is no direct proof that marriage improves health and life expectancy.

Yep, that is the way I see it too.

MalfunctionNeedInput wrote:

Where was the proof backed up by their research. I read a bunch of baseless claims…Smells like bulls~~~ after all I’ve seen.

What research? The journalist was told to write something to make their advertisers happy. That is all.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[WallyParticipant]

I love articles like this! Men can see it for what it is, but look at the comments and the men discussing MGTOW, that’s how I found out about MGTOW and that I was not alone.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

In this era the word of “study says’, ‘scienticifly proven’, and more of logical word are not true anymore if that involves a thing about woman.

Feminism, destroy everything since the first wave.

[AscendedParticipant 698]

Video games are also triggering amok runs.

Riiight.

"We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Author = t~~~

Comments = MGTOW nukes

Times are changing ‘ladies’.

Fuck this planet.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10917]

Article was written by a c~~~.
Everything that women say is a lie.
Credibility of an article written by a c~~~ is ZERO.

Marriage is more beneficial for men?
Same pig but with a new outfit and different lipstick.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

The problem is you can’t study the effects if marriage without including the effects of divorce. If you included the 50% of men destroyed by marriage the outcome would be different.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[AFTParticipant 2726]

The only opportunity marriage gives a man is to get divorced and therefore financially raped.

@ richardhutnik, I see it the same way, it’s not marriage nor relationships that are the problem, it’s the laws governing them.

But you can’t seperate the two, while the laws are so misandrist, women have become absolutely toxic, and besides marriage is between you and the state.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

This is priceless!

Notice that the research was done by the LONDON blah, LONDON blah blah, and the LONDON blah blah blah, but was published by the AMERICAN journal of public health. There’s got to be a good reason that the research wasn’t published by anyone in the UK, and that’s because it’s untouchable!

Notwithstanding that, cherry picking data and then making baseless statements, is an awesome way to make things sound good, and I quote:

“Single women do not suffer the same negative health effects as unmarried men.” Comparing apples with oranges here: a single person is one not in a relationship, an unmarried person is one who IS in a relationship, possibly even engaged to be married, but as yet unmarried.
In fact, middle aged women who had never married had virtually the same chance of developing metabolic syndrome – a combination of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity – as married women Massive age range difference here – middle age women are between 40-49, married women can be aged 20-99. Again, comparing apples with oranges.
“Not marrying or cohabiting is less detrimental among woman than men,” This statement is disingenuous, as the results for women use the study sample (57 yrs) but the only results used for men are in a separate study looking at men and women aged 60-79 in 1991! That’s OLD age, and almost 25 years prior! Apples? Oranges? Oh, wait, patriarchy.
The team analysed information on more than 10,000 people born in England, Scotland and Wales in the same week of spring 1958. so, a pretty narrow age range, and all of them 57 years old, which, according to the same paper, the Telegraph, is right at the very end middle age, which ends at 58!
And although they showed slightly higher levels of a biomarker which signifies an increased risk of breathing problems, it was far lower than the risk of illness for unmarried men. The same was true of a biomarker for heart problems which was raised 14 per cent in men but was barely noticeable in women. heart disease affects 1 in 6 men (17%), and 1 in 10 women (10%), so that’s actually a 70% increase. A 14% increase sounds much better!
“The bottom line is that married parents are far more likely to stay together, independent of age or education” [than whom???? not specified.]
A major study in 2011 found that being married lowered the risk of premature death by 15 per cent. that’s a nice way of saying that suicide (“premature death”) increases AFTER marriage ends.
From the article itself: Differences between our findings and those of previous studies could be attributable to self-reporting bias
The study, and the article (which actually doesn’t even reference the real study), do not say anything about suicides, depression and financial rape of men.

Is it really a surprise that NO professional journals in the UK would touch this study?

[Author]

Posts