Manginas versus PUA?

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

what’s the difference between manginas and PUAs?

what do mgtows think about PUAs? For example Roosh V is a very popular PUA.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[HitmanParticipant]

hope this helps , and i may be a bit off but i think its this ;
mangina ; a real pussy who serves women they don’t even know.bows and scrapes before the princess’ ..and theyr’e ALL princess’ to him.
PUA ; pussy hunter , main goal is getting laid, top priority to look good, exercise ,be fit and healthy is NOT for himself , but to pick up chicks.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Manginas: “pussy worshippers” … blindly believing whatever the femsteppos tell them is right; entitled to a life of servitude, in return for a few ‘benefits’ that they might or moght not get.

PUAs: Slightly intelligent beings who know the real agenda of women, and thus exploit them and obtain their ‘benefits’ from them; but are not enslaved like the manginas are.

I think the primary difference b/n MGTOWs and PUAs is that PUAs exploit the current situation and get what they want, they don’t wish to ‘abstain’ from getting the ‘good stuff’; they think they ‘deserve’ their share of pleasure and go about it. Whereas MGTOWs are totally fine with not being able to ‘score’. We believe our time is way too precious to waste on chasing skirts. A PUA can becme a MGTOW but a MGTOW can never become a PUA (of course, with exceptions that I don’t realy know..I still have a lot to learn).

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Both manginas and PUAs have this in common: They subordinate themselves to the whims of women.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

they’re both clowns.

PUA is a happy clown
and
mangina is a sad clown

but together they make a decent act

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

Manginas are those sad male arse holes who hang around wimins groups and identify as feminists. These are proper blue pill beta males who wrongly believe that talking the feminazi talk and walking the feminazi walk will get them laid. It won’t and never will, their feminazi masters actually dispise them.

A PUA claims to be red pill, yet some openly claim to “love” wimin. They employ a system of psycological tricks and stratagies to get to sleep with wimin. This system is called “game”. A PUA will claim to be succesful with wimin, however this success is defined by how many wimin they have f~~~ed, ie how acceptable he is to wimin.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Just got the graphic of Obama checking out the girl’s ass titled “MGTOW means never having to say you’re sorry.”

Good timing.

I still like to fancy myself a bit of a PUA occasionally when the itch strikes and I want to get some strange.

The difference is I don’t let women waste my time and they sure as hell aren’t the focus of my life. If a chick doesn’t approach me or respond to small talk Im out of there.

If we go out, we go dutch, or something similar like where I pick up dinner and she picks up the entertainment.

In both cases, it’s food I want to eat and entertainment I want to see/do or no deal.

FWIW, if it weren’t for PUA I never would have found MGTOW. Even if I had found it, I wouldn’t have responded to it if not for the side of women I learned about from PUA. PUA introduced me to hypergamy, and taught my how to use that to control and manipulate women. Since I like to mess with people’s heads (only those that REALLY deserve it though), this was a great way to do that AND get laid. Win – win.

Understand I don’t consider myself that great of a PUA even when I was full on into it. And I never got along with any of the “sleaze professional PUA” types you hear about. I’ve met a few of them and I think they were either already physically attractive and didnt have much problem attracting women to begin with, or they’re lying. Way too much false arrogance, and I can understand why many on here can’t stand them.

That said, for MGTOWs that do want to occasionally get laid, don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater. There are some great techniques in PUA that can greatly minimize the time/money investment for getting laid.

I can tell you some stories.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Roosh did a good interview with Karen Straughn over the Reggie Yates BBC show, i think it’s on her channel. He has openly stated his dislike for MGTOWs for walking away from the table but meh, he’s entitled to his opionion. For the most part, i really couldn’t care less about him one way or the other.

It does amuse me how the MSM circus goes into a complete spin over someone who is essentially a dating coach trying to teach men how to navigate through the modern pitfalls of male/female interactions. The whole game has changed completely but there seems to be an expectation for men to remain in traditional beta provider mode even when this has become a role of diminishing returns for men who aren’t in the higher earners. Somehow women think that their higher salaries equate to a higher SMV – Hampster Logic.

Single women will outright refuse to date a man who is in a lower wage bracket. So what’s a man with low provider value to do other than wage his bets on hook ups and one-night stands rather than build anything substantial.

It’s all a moot point nowadays anyway because both hook up culture and Marriage have become political and legal minefields.

[FrederickTheGreatParticipant 235]

Like most of the previous posters, I tend to focus more the similarities of PUA and manginas. PUA and manginas both make earning value in the eyes of women a big priority (if not the only priority) in their lives. They have different means but the same ends. MGTOW have a different goal that is independent of pleasing women. Our goals and the means we use to achieve them vary as much as our individuality. That is why MGTOW is the only acceptable way for the man who will not compromise himself to pursue the “what do women want” thing.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

FrederickTheGreat wrote:

Like most of the previous posters, I tend to focus more the similarities of PUA and manginas. PUA and manginas both make earning value in the eyes of women a big priority (if not the only priority) in their lives. They have different means but the same ends. MGTOW have a different goal that is independent of pleasing women. Our goals and the means we use to achieve them vary as much as our individuality. That is why MGTOW is the only acceptable way for the man who will not compromise himself to pursue the “what do women want” thing.

I agree. A feminist can still blame a PUA in the terms: “You can’t make do without us women”. MGTOWs, on the other hand, don’t give this chance to them. Independent means not dependent on anybody. PUAs are dependent on women for their pleasure, we are not. Though I won’t say it makes them look any less cooler.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Mangina’s are following the programming. I don’t blame them. they haven’t woken up yet.

PUA are just filth in my opinion.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Author]

Posts