Man assaulted by Girlfriend until………(video inside)

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Notice soon as he loses his cool and attacks back she gets help,but for the first 100 punches no one does anything.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Always remember, abusive trollops deserve equal rights……and lefts!

LOL!!!

[Anonymous 17]

If it’s just his girlfriend he should have banned her out of his life forever after her first signs of aggressive behavior, because it only gets worse. Some women are dangerously aggressive and those attacks need a quick response to protect innocent people, but in this case it seems to start with minor slaps or punches. Unacceptable behavior but it’s better to dump her and walk away than to return the aggression excessively. This woman will never be a good wife or mother so what’s the use.

[Anonymous 1]

They look like a couple of drunken morons.

[Anonymous 42]

I counted 23 strikes on him before he did the WRONG THING!
Technically assaults the other women attempting to grab her phone (tampering with evidence).

Five hard blows to her head like that is aggravated assault with intent to cause bodily harm, border-lining attempted murder, had her brain swelled and she died, absolutely 1st degree murder.

The moment anger and strife come over a woman always always always always always always always always immediately immediately immediately immediately WALK AWAY (keeping your eyes on her for self protection so she doesn’t stab you in the back).

Zuberi Tau, I have to disagree, equal rights and lefts is a great hashtag for a misogynistic Neanderthal living in a cave, exactly how feminists want to paint us, but you and I are different than that, we’re above that, we’re convincing the young ones to chill out on ALL THE BULLS~~~ and to calmly and collectively s~~~ can it, then walk the f~~~ away never to return.

Equal rights,,,, and lefts has disgusted since I first saw it written on a poster of a woman with a black eye, TURNS. MY. STOMACH.

Loosing your f~~~ing cool like that can land you in Bubba’s ass f~~~ing prison!
Men have to discipline themselves to be absolutely respected! He f~~~ed himself in the ass by allowing 23 blows of disrespect!

That stripper that attacked me with a red stiletto was aiming to do me harm and my only actions from my training was to remain calm blocking the aggressive while backing up to maintain the upper hand. When she fell off the bar onto a stool I could have kicked in her face. I chose wisely by putting as much distance between us by leaving never to return. It wasn’t until the next day that I started to realize how wrong it could have gone and in how many different ways.

That dissension to flee just may have save my life…

[RhettParticipant 637]

Poor man needs MGTOW.COM in his life. It would’ve been a short video if at all had any of us been that guy.

Single guys come home, look at what’s in the fridge, and go to bed. Married guys come home, look at what’s in bed, and go to the fridge.......But the best representative of MGTOW is…………… an empty chair,.

[Anonymous 42]

The feminists editors at U-tube will leave a video like that up, while taking down videos of female on male violence.

They’re masters at making men look bad and women look good, they’ll even cheat, scam, and outright lie…

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

He used excessive force. A bitchslap here and there and a push to get her on the ground would’ve been enough, but I understand why he snapped at some point. I’ve seen the vid om the mgtow worldwide facebookpage and one guy said he heard Russian, so we might need Russki to translate for us.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I watched this several times, and it p~~~ed me off a little more each time. But once that anger wore off a little, I analyzed this video this way: It is pretty clear to me that her intent was to cause him as much pain as she possibly could. Her intent was to do as much harm as she was physically capable of doing. However else you look at this, that’s how the video begins. Whatever their disagreement was, it was verbal until she made the decision for it to become physical. And when she made that decision, she carried it out with all the malice that she possibly could. Whatever we can say about his behavior, that was her behavior. She owns that.

It’s also clear from the video that she is an adult, which means that she is both in control of, and responsible for her own behavior. She has no weapon, and no physical shield. And when he (finally) swung back at her, she was unprepared for either defense or escape. Why? She made that decision with malice and carried it out with all the harm she was physically capable of inflicting… on a person also in control of his own behavior and clearly capable of causing her similar or greater harm… based only on the assumption that some unseen force protected her. What is that unseen force that she relied on with such enormous confidence?

She would not go into the forrest and do that to a bear or a wolf expecting that unseen force to protect her. She would not do that to another adult female relying on that unseen force to protect her. She wouldn’t do it to an electrical transformer, or to a barbed wire fence, or to a cactus, or to an oncoming train, or to an open flame with that expectation of unseen protection. She might do that to a child, but never in public. The majority of child abuse is committed by women, but they generally don’t do it in public. They know that unseen protection does not apply in public when they abuse a child. It does not apply to abuse of any of those other things either, SO THEY DON’T DO IT.

It’s easy to find people of both genders who will say ‘she was drunk’ or ‘she was hysterical’ in an attempt to explain that her behavior was no longer within her control and therefore no longer her responsibility. But if drunk or hysterical removes her control over her own behavior, it does not transfer that control to someone else. And the people making this argument won’t even attempt to say that it does, or to identify the recipient of that responsibility. So, being female, drunk and hysterical just makes her some kind of random, unguided missile that no one is in control of, or responsible for.

My question is: if drunk/hysterical and female results in truly random behavior, why is it only men who they take a swing at? Why is it never a cactus, or a bear, or an oncoming train they take a swing at? If the behavior really was random and uncontrolled, wouldn’t every possible target get hit in relative proportion to its availability in the environment? Why is it only men?

I submit that it cannot be so repetitive if it was actually random behavior. A toddler might try to swing at an open flame or a barbed wire fence. But this is why toddlers are closely supervised and not allowed to be in control of their own behavior. Yet, by the time they are adults, they are no longer swinging at exposed electrical wires, or open flames or barbed wire fences… because they have learned. That female toddlers are still swinging at men after they have become adults is also because of something THEY HAVE LEARNED.

Did anyone else besides me notice that after 23 unanswered strikes, when this guy finally responded, she stopped swinging? After he hit back ONE time. She did not swing again. His first hit did not knock her out or incapacitate her. She could have swung at him a 24th time, but she didn’t. She chose not to. She CHOSE a different behavior, and that choice was a suspiciously very wise and very reasonable one for someone theoretically not in control of her own behavior…

Why? BECAUSE SHE LEARNED.

This video starts with a woman’s behavior demonstrating her belief that a man does not deserve the same right of physical safety or self defense as a child, and dog or even a plant. She is not a toddler unaware of or without positive control of her behavior. Her behavior is calculated, but based on an erroneous assumption about this particular man. The unseen force is what I’ll call “female privilege”. It is sometimes thought to be unlimited and almost always more reliable than it deserves based on any reason or logic. But in this particular case, it did not extend past that 23rd strike. Up to that point, it was reliable. Beyond that, it was an erroneous assumption. Once that erroneous assumption was corrected, her behavior changed immediately. (Toddlers learn quickly. Adult women learn even faster.)

I won’t argue with Mgtower’s point that the easiest thing for him might be to back away. But this is because of the enormously one sided consequences that are going to be imposed on him by a very unfair system, not because he is less worthy than a child, a dog or a plant. In the short run, Mgtower is correct.

But in the long run, when confronted with this behavior, a man’s response is going to be a learning moment for her no matter what he does. Back away without defending yourself and you have taught her that her belief that you are beneath a dog or a plant is a valid, accurate belief. Stand there and take it until she is satisfied with the harm she has chosen to cause you, and this teaches her something as well. It teaches her what you believe about yourself. Hit her back immediately and though the consequences for you will be unfairly applied, she will learn just as the woman in this video learned. She will learn from your response… no matter what your response is. You have to decide what you want to teach her about yourself.

It may be argued that his 2nd, 3rd, 4th hits were unnecessary because once her behavior changed, he had successfully corrected that erroneous belief and regained his own safety. But if his first hit had come immediately in response to hers, the correction to that erroneous belief would have been more efficient and her next 22 hits would have never occurred.

I think that if starting today, this were every man’s response to this behavior from a woman EVERY time it occurred (setting aside the unfairly applied consequences for a moment), videos of drunk/hysterical women striking men this way would get posted about as often as we see videos of drunk/hysterical women striking a cactus or an oncoming train… which is essentially never.

Everything you do (or don’t do) in your environment announces and teaches everyone in your environment something about you. You get to decide what it is that will get learned about you. With women, think carefully about what you will announce, because they learn very quickly, and they will act (or not act) on it very reliably…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[LurchParticipant 3872]

Anonymous wrote:

The moment anger and strife come over a woman always always always always always always always always immediately immediately immediately immediately WALK AWAY (keeping your eyes on her for self protection so she doesn’t stab you in the back).

Indeed. This guy is totally f~~~ed in the eyes of the law, despite having the gynocentric system stacked against him.

In the video, 5 seconds in, you see him put his hands on her arms and hold her and turn her toward him. At Common Law, an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact, is considered assault. The key phrase here is… “apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact”, which of course she is going to claim in a heartbeat.

Thus from THAT point she can claim he instigated the whole incident and she was merely “defending” her self. We know this self-defense claim is BS, but since this guy attacked her after the 23 odd blows she threw at him, he would have left marks on her, which she could further use to twist to story of assault.

He on the other hand would have no marks, because lets face it… from the punches/slaps she threw, they would do nothing against his solid frame.

Just like MG-ɹǝʍo┴ said, as soon as she threw the first punch, he should have just grabbed the car keys and walked away.

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[LurchParticipant 3872]

BrainPilot wrote:

I won’t argue with Mgtower’s point that the easiest thing for him might be to back away. But this is because of the enormously one sided consequences that are going to be imposed on him by a very unfair system, not because he is less worthy than a child, a dog or a plant. In the short run, Mgtower is correct.

But in the long run, when confronted with this behavior, a man’s response is going to be a learning moment for her no matter what he does. Back away without defending yourself and you have taught her that her belief that you are beneath a dog or a plant is a valid, accurate belief. Stand there and take it until she is satisfied with the harm she has chosen to cause you, and this teaches her something as well. It teaches her what you believe about yourself. Hit her back immediately and though the consequences for you will be unfairly applied, she will learn just as the woman in this video learned. She will learn from your response… no matter what your response is. You have to decide what you want to teach her about yourself.

Good points, however at the end of the day, when a man is confronted with this situation he has two choices:

1. Take the beating and don’t escalate the situation. She learns you are a beta punching bag and the man and relationship is worse off.

2. Defend himself, teach her that he is not to be physically abused, she claims assault, he gets arrested, goes to jail, get’s a criminal record and is marked for the rest of his life as a “wife beater”.

Either way he’s f~~~ed!

The only solution… Don’t get into that situation in the first place. GO MGTOW!

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[AttonParticipant]

Society would have me believe this woman is a victim, I am never going to buy that bulls~~~ again. Honestly the only bad thing about this video is that she didn’t win a Darwin Award.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[SimpleTaterSpectator 56]

That bitch who interfered should be tried for taking the side of the criminal in this case.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

I saw this on the Metro wesite earlier.

People in the comments section and are calling them out on it – both men and women for the usual bulls~~~ spin.

I don’t condone violence, but that man took over 20 punches/hits off that woman without retaliation before something eventually pushed him over the edge. Spinning it as one-sided domestic violence is beyond pale. They’re clearly both more than capable of inflicting violence.

http://metro.co.uk/2016/06/08/boyfriend-knocks-girlfriend-to-the-ground-with-repeated-punches-5930443/

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Nerevar wrote:

He used excessive force. A bitchslap here and there and a push to get her on the ground would’ve been enough, but I understand why he snapped at some point. I’ve seen the vid om the mgtow worldwide facebookpage and one guy said he heard Russian, so we might need Russki to translate for us.

Nothing out of ordinary. Typical BS – you can pretty much guess no matter the language. It started with him saying “You only care about yourself – you don’t care about me”. This was very typical line in the arguments I had with my XW also.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

That was disturbing from beginning to end. I wonder who was videoing it? I also wonder how many times she’s hit him previously. I don’t condone any of his behaviour – not getting in her face at the start, not failing to walk away, and not punching her to the ground – but it’s fascinating to watch how she just keeps escalating and escalating, and even when he begins to hit back she doesn’t run. Its what she wanted for some sick reason, she pushed and pushed and pushed harder, then got the result she wanted. I hope it was worth it for her, it sure as hell wasn’t worth it for him as now he gets the consequences of losing it.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

I don’t want to be hitting women and going to jail for it. In any case, the guy should have defended himslef, you just don’t stand there.

If you get the punch fall onto yourself, it only aggravates the possibility of you wanting to hit her back. As I’ve learned from fighting experience, defence is key; block left, block right. Block front if you don’t want her to break your nose.. clench your fist before blocking. It helps.

In some cases, you can also put on a ‘villain’ face that might discourage the attacker from continuously attacking you. I’ve used that trick many times when I fought with my brother…. make the face: people get intimidated visually too.

Like always, prevention is better than cure. Do not travel alone with a women; and if you can’t help it, keep your camcorder or video-recording-enabled phone close by. It will save you from jail-time.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[sidecarParticipant 35859]

After she threw that first punch he should have gotten into his car and driven away, leaving her there to regret her choices.

That being said, I would acquit him were I on the jury for this case.

[RedPillBonerParticipant 541]

Where he f~~~ed up is when he wouldn’t let her leave in the car. Also running after the other lady and putting his hands on her was his second f~~~ up.

She belongs in jail as well.

[LurchParticipant 3872]

Atton wrote:

Society would have me believe this woman is a victim

… and you would be RIGHT!

You know when I said that this guy is F~~~ED no matter what he did? Well then… let the TRIAL BY MEDIA begin:

COWARDLY ATTACK ‘What the f*** did you do?’ Sick video shows man knocking his girlfriend out by repeatedly punching her in the face

With the by line of…

“Brute lashes out at petite woman after shouting ‘I love you’ in shocking daylight assault”

This guy is guilty…. why? Penis!!!

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[Author]

Posts