Life is a roulette and a child is the ball.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

I had a conversation with a few women about children (including my own mother!) and I came to the conclusion that women have no the f~~~ing idea what they breed children for! They just breed! So what’s about men?

I heared and read some the MGTOW brothers here about why you should not have children. Briefly my personal opinion.
– Not to step in the s~~~ like the alimony and child support, – agreed.
– Family, especially a two-parent family, holds back the man, – agreed.
– Overpopulation which leads to a starvation, – bulls~~~. Most arable lands are not used, especially in Russia.

Now I want us to make clear of what a child is? Is a child the path to a kind of immortality? As it’s said “Our immortality is in our children”. Or perhaps a child is a merely successor for our property.

My point of view is that a child (in the most cases) it’s an embodiment of the adult “don’t give a f~~~”. Why did adults conceive a baby? Just because they wanted! That’s all! They realy do not give a f~~~ of what after will be. They have not even a single thought that they DO create a new living being, the new personality, that didn’t exist until the moment. It was not starving, not feeling, not suffering. Moreover, since the birth, the child should live through the next 70-80 years!

Briefly for the “Why you should not have children”

– Do you understand that you force your children to take a part in a roulette game? (by making a baby you make a bet, and drop the ball once your baby is born.) No one knows will your child rise or fall. It doesn’t depend on you directly.
– So are you ready to soften its blow, to teach how to live?
– Are you ready to support your child with money in case of it unsuccess in handling its living? That were you who pushed it into this world!

So, these my thoughts. Hope it’s not too messy. Women don’t understand my point. And you?

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

You’re not having a child. You’re having an adult. The “childhood” represents a short span of the offspring’s life.

: I’m having a baby. Yay for me. Pay attention to me. Buy me things I don’t need.
GHOW: You’re having an adult. Make me a sandwich.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Solo MAN’S Wisdom wrote:

You’re not having a child. You’re having an adult. The “childhood” represents a short span of the offspring’s life.

I heard a different saying. “When I was a child I didn’t understand why adults can’t reach an agreement with each other. Then I grew up and realize that there is no such thing as an adult”.lol

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Having rebuilt several engines, one of them (top end) while on the side of the highway, I have a hard time fathoming why anyone would want to restore old cars as a hobby. The wrench slips and you cut your hand. Oil comes pouring out from somewhere you didn’t expect and gets on your face/eyes. Bolts that break off. Why the f~~~ would anyone want to put themselves through that?

Yet we all totally get it when someone says they love restoring old cars. Completely understand.

So it is with children. The care for them in infancy is little more than basic animal husbandry. Sure there’s some nights where you get woken up for a while, but working in IT, I’m quite used to that. When a server wakes up and “cries” there can be any number of causes. When your child does it, there’s usually only about 3 things it could be, all of which are fairly easy to remedy.

I stayed at home to take care of my kid for her first year. Just burned up my savings, did a few odd jobs. TOTALLY WORTH IT.

Like restoring cars, parenthood isn’t for everyone, but there’s one overwhelming reason I’m seriously considering doing it again myself: It was actually a LOT of fun.

Plus I got a great kid out of it.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Anonymous 3]

People want to “make” kids into something.
It wont work.
Kids are people. You cannot “make” people, you just give them tools to be the best they can be.

That is why I have a negative experience with my kids. My psycho wife expects them to be something they are not. Then she shames them for not being it.
And being from the “nurturing” gender, she destroys their self-esteem in the process.

What does the “nurturing” gender, knowing kids learn responsibility and accountability by doing things themselves, succeeding or failing by their own hand?
Simple, avoid giving them autonomy and shelter them from their mistakes.

Thats how you make snowflakes…

So, what did I do?

I promised my unborn child, while his pregnant mother was throwing me a glass of water publicly, that I would endure everything until he was 12. I said I would do it for him.

That was the most idiotic decision I ever made. Right there I gave my wife permission to do everything. I made myself the rug she steps over.

To endure abuse is not heroic, it is not saintly, it will not get you to heaven.

How can it? The result is the destruction of yourself and your kids. I AM AN ACCOMPLICE BY OMISSION.

No. Kids are not clay that we mold into some kind of legacy monument. Our legacy, if any, is the tools and teachings we provide to another human being.
And Biggvs_dickvs is right. Its is not for everybody.

[Anonymous 3]

I just read a quote that explains everything about kids:

Divorce laws favor the female in every respect, disincentives hard work, drives a wedge between fathers and children, and indeed, makes the entire family unit and even the relationship between a father and son completely at the will of the wife and mother.

Completely at the will of the wife and mother…

The father either hold out or gets out.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

Pregnancy rates would drop by about 80% and their would be a massive increase in men getting vasectomies if:

Public (taxpayer funded) education grades K-12 did not exist and parent’s had to actually pay the $11-14k a year (depending on the area/state average) for their kids to get an education.

&

If when someone had a kid, instead of government subsidized student loans, Pell Grants and financial aid paying for the kid, turned adult at 18 years old for college – – The government initiated a tax on parent’s to fund their kids college. Imposed and collected, just like the Social Security tax, as a percentage of income.

And the list goes on.

Once something (having kids) is subsidized and enough of it is paid for by the state: The true costs are not calculated or considered by the breeding parties involved and the decision is made with less thought.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Anonymous wrote:

My psycho wife expects them to be something they are not. Then she shames them for not being it.

By the way, here is another reason why people want children. They merely wish to have the second try, to be back via the children.

One more example is a one of my great-grandfathers. He was born in 1901 and lived through four wars (Russo-Japanese, World War I, the Civil War and World War II). In case he could be asked if he wants to be born in that time, what his answer would be, how do you think? Of course not kinda “Hell, yeah!”

Figuratively saying, a woman’s vagina is the gate to the most merciless field test where we all going to die. In the same time, it is a man who initiates the test, and of course he doesn’t ask a child if it wants to be born. Besause parenthood is

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

actually a LOT of fun.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[Author]

Posts