Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Lewis's Law: This is why you can't respond to feminism
This topic contains 10 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by
Anonymous 4 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Lewis'_Law
Lewis’ law was first articulated by Helen Lewis on Twitter in August 2012: “Comments on any article about feminism justify feminism.”
Pretty much, you go in at all to say anything a writer said about Feminism, and it gets turned around to be an argument on why Feminism is correct. You have network of arguments so wound up in a victim complex, that you say anything against anything they push, it gets turned around against you and spun to be evidence for Feminism.
So, if you in and respond to Feminism, and articles, and put comments, it will be spun as Feminism is correct.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
Unspeak is alive and well in 2015
Orwell is god.
So, if you in and respond to Feminism, and articles, and put comments, it will be spun as Feminism is correct.
Ignoring and disengaging from it…Going Your Own Way if you will…is what many of us here do. The best weapon in many situations with women is to simply ignore it. *Nobody* likes to be ignored and it is MUCH more effective then shouting, ranting and trying to “outwit” your opponent. Stonewalling requires little to no energy or focus and so allows you to carry on your day. I reserve my wit for the good times haha!
Marriage? No thanks, i'm not ready to be THAT miserable.
Ignoring and disengaging from it…Going Your Own Way if you will…is what many of us here do. The best weapon in many situations with women is to simply ignore it. *Nobody* likes to be ignored and it is MUCH more effective then shouting, ranting and trying to “outwit” your opponent. Stonewalling requires little to no energy or focus and so allows you to carry on your day. I reserve my wit for the good times haha!
That’s my plan too. It’s been working so far. The day may come when ignoring them becomes a hate crime. If so, I hope they let me bring the dog along to the reeducation camp.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

Anonymous25Please do not feed the animals.
Starve them of attention walk away, ignore their nonsense and don’t speak to them and don’t make eye contact. Acknowledging them in any way just reinforces the behaviour. We know from cue reinforced learning, that reinforced behaviours recur. If they get attention, they will keep doing it.
“People criticize nazis, so we need to vote for nazis”
Feminist logic 101.
Arguing with these morons only serves their victim complex.
Let them die of starvation.It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.
Anything you place on the the battlefield against an opponent runs the risk of being turned into a weapon against you. Come up with the end all and be all of comebacks against someone? Well, expect it to return back in spades, or a different form.
And this is where MGTOW has an edge over others groups in the said “manosphere”. They want to fight all the time against opponents to “win”, and need to do this. What that does is create a cycle of endless oneupmanship against opponents, and really not much in improving one’s own life. I see MGTOW all about improving oneself, because the focus is there.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
This is a funny coincidence. I was going to do a post on the topic of how to talk to a feminist.
My idea was to down load the Duke Nukum sound board app and use the sound bites to respond to their s~~~.
“Hail to the king baby”. ” It hurts to be you”, “I am Duke Nukem and I am going to get the rest of you alien basters” …
The way I am looking to talk to feminists, is to end up stripping them of their gender, and treating them as human being, without a gender, and based my interaction with them based upon what they can do for me personally, to help with my life. Like, are they a good accountant or lawyer, and can they do things competently? I judge them based on their personal utility to me. I give them what they say they want, by stripping them of their group identity they claim they are arguing for. They say they want equality? I will treat them as anyone else, and approve or disapprove of them by their utility and merit.
After all, isn’t what they are wanting? They just aren’t going to get anything from me because they have a female identity. An attribute you have means squat to me personally, because an attribute doesn’t DO anything. Maybe humans who share your attribute managed to get discriminated against because of that attribute, but that doesn’t mean you get a free pass from them, nor do you speak for anyone but yourself.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
Or keep it simple, save your energy and avoid feminists as much as possible.
Marriage? No thanks, i'm not ready to be THAT miserable.

Anonymous42I pulled this from that trash heap of narcissism:
“So, you made a mistake. You gave a porny presentation at a technology conference, or you made a sexist blog post, or you organized a conference with 0.00% female speakers. And, you got called out on it. What can you do?
Don’t dig any deeper”
Can you imagine being “called out” for not having any female MGTOW speakers??? Another example of the mind f~~~ery feminism offers. Just close the door to the nuthouse, walk away, then watch peace and quite reign along with stability.
Feminism offers a man 2 “choices”; 1, allow. 2, reject.
MG-Tower’s exit!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
