John Cena DOESN'T Want Kids and Doesn't Want a Wife,,,Sounds MGTOW To Me

[experiencedParticipant]

ForeverDone wrote:

Murph wrote:

OldBill wrote:

They always think they can change you. Deep down in their rotten little hearts, they believe it is their duty to change you for you own good.

For women, it’s a game. That is why manginas are such a turnoff, among other things. With manginas, the game is already won, but with a guy who acts like a prick, the game is fun. The whole challenge is to see if she can break him and turn him into a cuck. And the best part is that if he allows himself to be broken, she will immediately lose all respect for him and either divorce him or start banging chads on the side.

You know which group of men that I have seen never get divorced and whose wives are most loyal to them? Abusive men with money. Seriously, these men basically give women the best of both worlds. They have the resources that women desire, but they also don’t allow themselves to be controlled by women, and they aren’t afraid to put a woman in her place when she crosses the line, and women respect them for it. It sounds really f~~~ed up, but it’s true. I know if I ever got married, I’d be destined to end up in divorce court because I’m not an abusive prick.

The issue is, for many men, divorce and the trauma that they must go through just to undo a mistake is life changing. We do not look at the world or women the same way. To go down that aisle again is just too frightful. Not only do you have to pay lawyers a kings ransom, but possibly give another person some of your assets when they’ve done nothing for it? Only a fool would do the same mistake twice. I mean, if you hit yourself on the head with a hammer, would you continue to do it in order to see if it still would hurt? Of course not. This is why he had second thoughts. I believe he still loves her. However, he loves himself even more. Do you think she’d be there if he lost everything or was unable to work and earn all that money? I do not think so. I do not know any woman nowadays that would. My ex-wife was a doc., and she left me for dead when I was in living hell. Proof in point, fvck em, don’t marry em or procreate with them. That pvssy is like a Venus fly trap.

this

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

OldBill wrote:

ForeverDone wrote:

Perhaps, but as long as you don’t impregnate or co-habitate and just fornicate, then all should be okay

You missed the recent thread about the Arizona man who spent two years and several thousand dollars fighting a paternity claim made by a California woman who picked his name out of the phone book, didn’t you?

Also while you correctly note that your VAR “condom” is legal in New York, you don’t understand that it’s only currently legal. Laws change and expecting them to change in ways advantageous to men is a denial of reality.

If you truly need access to their holes, go right ahead. Just be aware of the risks and don’t ever downplay the same.

That’s his problem. He lived in Cali. Plus, I am in amazing control of my body. Always have a condom, pull out before ejaculating and then cleaning up and taking my boys with me. Kind of hard to be in that position, as DNA would clear things up pretty quick. VARs being outlawed in NY, it’s possible, but highly doubtful.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

Nikki is on the defensive now. LOL. Can’t make this sh!t up.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/why-nikki-bella-broke-off-210044661.html

[KevinStylesParticipant 2580]

Wrestlers are on the road 300 days a year. Sounds like a wise decision to me to not have kids when you live that kind of lifestyle. His kids would essentially grow up without a dad around much and if he doesn’t want his kids brought up that way then cool for him for holding firm on not bringing any into this world.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

KevinStyles wrote:

Wrestlers are on the road 300 days a year. Sounds like a wise decision to me to not have kids when you live that kind of lifestyle. His kids would essentially grow up without a dad around much and if he doesn’t want his kids brought up that way then cool for him for holding firm on not bringing any into this world.

She wants kids, so SHE can sit home and retire, and milk him for the few years he has left in the business while also living off her and her sister’s clothing line. She was hoping to buckle him down and he’s all about making that $$$.

[OldBillParticipant]

ForeverDone wrote:

That’s his problem. He lived in Cali.

Wrong.

He lived in Arizona. She lived in California. She picked his name out of a phone book because he lived in Arizona thus making it harder to contest her claim.

We get it. You’re in perfect control at all times and no one can ever get one over on you. Nothing bad will ever happen to you. Your condoms will always work, none of the whores you become involved with will ever make the One Phone Call, and your VAR devices will always get you out of trouble before it happens.

Pixies make the flowers grow too.

There’s no problem with taking risks. No problem IF you honestly assess those risks and then take honest steps to mitigate them. Condoms aren’t 100% effective, your devices do not record 100% of your life, and women can turn on you in a heartbeat.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

ForeverDone wrote:

OldBill wrote:

ForeverDone wrote:

Perhaps, but as long as you don’t impregnate or co-habitate and just fornicate, then all should be okay

You missed the recent thread about the Arizona man who spent two years and several thousand dollars fighting a paternity claim made by a California woman who picked his name out of the phone book, didn’t you?

Also while you correctly note that your VAR “condom” is legal in New York, you don’t understand that it’s only currently legal. Laws change and expecting them to change in ways advantageous to men is a denial of reality.

If you truly need access to their holes, go right ahead. Just be aware of the risks and don’t ever downplay the same.

That’s his problem. He lived in Cali. Plus, I am in amazing control of my body. Always have a condom, pull out before ejaculating and then cleaning up and taking my boys with me. Kind of hard to be in that position, as DNA would clear things up pretty quick. VARs being outlawed in NY, it’s possible, but highly doubtful.

What foolishness! You’ve been here too long to be this naive.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

OldBill wrote:

ForeverDone wrote:

That’s his problem. He lived in Cali.

Wrong.

He lived in Arizona. She lived in California. She picked his name out of a phone book because he lived in Arizona thus making it harder to contest her claim.

We get it. You’re in perfect control at all times and no one can ever get one over on you. Nothing bad will ever happen to you. Your condoms will always work, none of the whores you become involved with will ever make the One Phone Call, and your VAR devices will always get you out of trouble before it happens.

Pixies make the flowers grow too.

There’s no problem with taking risks. No problem IF you honestly assess those risks and then take honest steps to mitigate them. Condoms aren’t 100% effective, your devices do not record 100% of your life, and women can turn on you in a heartbeat.

Doesn’t matter. Cali laws would be with the woman, not AZ laws.

No one is perfect. However, I take adequate precautions to ensure my best chance of survival. If I was perfect, I would not had gotten married. However, again, I put in adequate insurances to protect my ass and assets in case the s~~~ hits the fan. It did, and while it was a toll on me emotionally (sadly, I’m human), financially I was protected.

That’s is the best one can do in this day and age. Always have insurance and a backup plan.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

IRuleMe wrote:

ForeverDone wrote:

OldBill wrote:

ForeverDone wrote:

Perhaps, but as long as you don’t impregnate or co-habitate and just fornicate, then all should be okay

You missed the recent thread about the Arizona man who spent two years and several thousand dollars fighting a paternity claim made by a California woman who picked his name out of the phone book, didn’t you?

Also while you correctly note that your VAR “condom” is legal in New York, you don’t understand that it’s only currently legal. Laws change and expecting them to change in ways advantageous to men is a denial of reality.

If you truly need access to their holes, go right ahead. Just be aware of the risks and don’t ever downplay the same.

That’s his problem. He lived in Cali. Plus, I am in amazing control of my body. Always have a condom, pull out before ejaculating and then cleaning up and taking my boys with me. Kind of hard to be in that position, as DNA would clear things up pretty quick. VARs being outlawed in NY, it’s possible, but highly doubtful.

What foolishness! You’ve been here too long to be this naive.

It seems pretty secure to have a condom, and even with the condom, pull out to ensure nothing drops into her love hole. What am I missing? Not raw dogging or anything. That’s pure Russian roulette. My way is pretty close to 100%.

[OldBillParticipant]

ForeverDone wrote:

Doesn’t matter. Cali laws would be with the woman, not AZ laws.

California laws did apply. That’s why he had to bring suit in a California court. He was very fortunate not only to learn of the child support claim within the period he was allowed to contest but also to have the wherewithal to contest that claim in a state other than his own.

As for condoms, what do you do with the used ones?

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

He was smart. He had her sign a 75 page agreement before she moved in.

[Anonymous 6]

Cena needs to do us all a favor and let us know what was in that 75 page contract he made her sign before she moved in. I guarantee you, he made sure he was covered on his end.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

ForeverDone wrote:

Perhaps, but as long as you don’t impregnate or co-habitate and just fornicate, then all should be okay. Also, I cannot recommend enough always have a VAR on your person if a man is going to date. Every date I ever go on I have a VAR in my pocket and I upload the recording to my digital encrypted hard drive. In New York, this is legal (one party needs to know about the recording, not both). Most 20 – 40 Y.O. do not really want to give up sex. So, at least for me, this is the safest route. As for her, she’s worth around 4 million. She should be okay.

Have you been living under a rock since last year? Ever heard about the #Meeto bulls~~~?

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Author]

Posts