Japanese Economy Will Crash Faster If They Start Promoting Women Over Men

[Anonymous 2]

As we all know, the herbivore men of Japan (basically just a name for the MGTOWs of their country) have been one of the major causes for Japan’s economic crises, largely due to population decline.

One of the biggest complaints by Japanese women is that they often get overlooked for promotions at their jobs due to the companies having a preference for wanting to promote men with families. Considering Japan’s societal structure, this philosophy on the part of these companies makes sense. Men are expected to earn all of the money in families while the women stay home to raise the children. In a society such as this, the more men that aren’t bringing home enough money, the fewer families you have.

Of course, female hypergamy plays a big role as well. Women who get promoted will not want to marry men that make less than them, so it’s either choose from the smaller pool of men making high salaries (who will most likely fall in the categories of “already married” or “MGTOW”), or spend your life childless. This will only serve to cause the population crises to spiral down towards economic doom at an even faster rate.

The Japanese government has focused solely on efforts to help women in order to solve the problem, when it is men who are the ones causing the decline because they don’t want the s~~~ deal of marriage and are choosing to opt out instead. If the government is going to continue to overlook men, then their fate is sealed, and it will only be a matter of time before western nations suffer the same fate. I fully expect western nations to follow suit, because they are so blinded by gynocentrism that they won’t even see how s~~~ting on men destroys Japan.

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

Japans theory on correcting the problem so far has been introducing things such as paid maternity leave … I mean are they completely insane ? The young men saw their fathers working 80 hours a week only to hand over their paycheck to their wife. The way it was working in Japan, the wife managed all the mans money. The wives would give their husband an allowance to spend, and it was usually just enough to pay for his food at work.

Needless to say the younger generation saw it, recognized it is no kind of life worth living at all. But instead of addressing the issue the males are facing, they give the WOMAN more paid maternity leave ??? You couldn’t come up with a cartoon more bizarre.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Great analysis Murph,

For some reason, it seems that many governments focus on pleasing women and assign men to second class status.

I personally fully expect the Japanese economy to crash faster as their government favors women over men.

If I lived in Japan, I would probably be a herbivore. I don’t think I would want to give a lady my paycheck and in return receive a small allowance.

Western countries are not far behind. I wonder if we will have cities spring up that are primarily geared towards MGTOW men. (?investment opportunity)

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Artificially propping up women and pushing men down is the fastest way to commit economic suicide.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

The “Utopian Mouse Experiment” was not so off after all. I don’t think we will go extinct, but foresee chaos before reason comes back. And reason will never return if woman are dominant in society.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Antipathy wrote:

The young men saw their fathers working 80 hours a week only to hand over their paycheck to their wife.

Yep!

FrostByte wrote:

The “Utopian Mouse Experiment” was not so off after all.

The first time I heard of that landmark experiment, I thought “this is exactly like every large city I’ve ever visited!” In other words, the experiment illustrates what goes on world wide in human societies.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

FrostByte wrote:

The “Utopian Mouse Experiment” was not so off after all. I don’t think we will go extinct, but foresee chaos before reason comes back. And reason will never return if woman are dominant in society.

That experiment provided a utopia with no obstacles. Real life provides REAL obstacles. War, famine, destruction. As TFM once pointed out, a massive war will get the human race back to the same loop it always runs on. That or an age of exploration.

You take the war out of people’s lives and we only suffer a different form of suck.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

I think you’re spot on Murph. The more women use their driveler to stack the deck with promotions etc, the less ‘good men’ (ie higher earners than her) there will be by definition, and the less marriage.

And a lot of happy single male tradies who can make a motza off those overpaid single women with no man around to take care of their place.

[AttonParticipant]

I fully expect western nations to follow suit, because they are so blinded by gynocentrism that they won’t even see how s~~~ting on men destroys Japan.

Systems blinded by gynocentrism sign their own death certificates. They abandon what makes them strong and those who built them. The Japanese men have the sense to abandon the very systems that have turned against them. I hope the western men take the same path honestly Japan will be one hell of an experiment.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 3]

Big Boss wrote:

FrostByte wrote:

The “Utopian Mouse Experiment” was not so off after all. I don’t think we will go extinct, but foresee chaos before reason comes back. And reason will never return if woman are dominant in society.

That experiment provided a utopia with no obstacles. Real life provides REAL obstacles. War, famine, destruction. As TFM once pointed out, a massive war will get the human race back to the same loop it always runs on. That or an age of exploration.

You take the war out of people’s lives and we only suffer a different form of suck.

War depending on when in the economic cycle either bankrupts and destroys a civilization or jump starts it. There is plenty of theory on economic cycles, you can read a quick bit here for the specific cycles I’m referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kondratiev_wave

Anyway, the only way war will help is if somehow enough of the male population gets slaughtered or the oligarchs somehow get slaughtered. Male value rises when there are less men, I guess you can think of it as scarcity so it would make sense. When there are few men, men’s labor has high value because it can’t just be taken for granted. When there are lots of men, it’s easy just to exploit them and take their resources to give to women and oligarchs.

I don’t think it’s worth worrying about though. Personally I know I’ll be dead before any of this stuff really happens. And even if I wasn’t, it doesn’t matter too much anymore. It may be a bigger problem for younger men, but society sucks for younger men anyway so they should also not care.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

The Japanese economic model is based entirely on the concept of limitless growth. Governments, banks, and other such scammers like this model because it’s very easy for them to skim off the top without anyone really noticing. The wealth they misappropriate is readily covered by the expanding economy. The problem is that limitless growth is an impossibility, so inevitably it leads to boom and bust economic cycles. This should be obvious to anyone who thinks about it.

When times are good, governments happily claim a larger slice of the pie, but when times are bad, governments do not tighten their own belts, and instead go into debt, counting on the next boom to cover that debt on top of the additional spending they plan. So effectively you get a boom and bust economic cycle ever increasingly failing to support an unlimitedly expanding government. It should be obvious that this is also eventually impossible. There always comes a time when a boom is incapable of covering the debt from the previous bust, the government goes into permanent debt accrual, and soon enough everything collapses. This effect is only magnified in contained economies like you get in island nations like Japan. But it’s happening everywhere.

The working alternative to unsustainable “limitless” growth is a steady state economic model. Governments etc. hate this type of economy because it severely limits what they can abscond with for their own purposes. So we tend to see people themselves adopt this model instead of governments, isolating their own, individual economics from the boom bust cycles of the whole economy. This is effectively what the herbivores in japan are doing, adopting sustainable personal economics wherein they generate enough wealth to support themselves but little more, and certainly not any grand surpluses or undisciplined consumption to drive “limitless” growth.

The more they unplug from the “limitless” growth economic model, more badly every attempt to force growth will fail. That is what we are seeing in Japan. And we are watching it fail.

But that is not our problem. And it’s not the herbivore’s problem either.

[TuneoutParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

The working alternative to unsustainable “limitless” growth is a steady state economic model. Governments etc. hate this type of economy because it severely limits what they can abscond with for their own purposes. So we tend to see people themselves adopt this model instead of governments, isolating their own, individual economics from the boom bust cycles of the whole economy. This is effectively what the herbivores in japan are doing, adopting sustainable personal economics wherein they generate enough wealth to support themselves but little more, and certainly not any grand surpluses or undisciplined consumption to drive “limitless” growth.

Very good observation brother,and I’d add that this model is not just restricted to Japan but used by
most !st world and emerging nations. They are all
living on borrowed time and speculation,which we’ve
already seen has disastrous results(crash of 2008)
Like you stated the smart people don’t buy into the
‘debt is good’ message of new car,new house,wife,kids
ect.
Instead we see some making wise investments,having zero
debt and living within or below their means.
Thats the difference when the money is yours,you are more likely to be careful with it,however if it is just
taxpayer dollars , well who cares?
You can bet the politicians don’t handle their personal finances like the country’s.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

The birth rate in the US is already declining. The second paragraph of the article says that women higher up on the corporate ladder don’t have kids. Translation: They won’t marry down. Good post Murph

http://www.market~~~ch.com/story/americas-falling-fertility-rate-explained-in-four-charts-2015-08-18

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

All attempts to promote women in Japanese economy are failing. Even bribing them with large incentives are not working. Economic studies in Japan are showing that the peak of 7% was reached by bribing the snowflakes followed by a steep drop down to about 3% of their women taking up the deal of the century.

The just don’t want to do it. Not the long hours or the responsibility.

Zero Tolerance

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Tuneout wrote:

Very good observation brother,and I’d add that this model is not just restricted to Japan but used by most !st world and emerging nations.

Definitely. The U.S. is one of the worst offenders. It’s just that, as I pointed out, insular economies (literally insular in the case of Japan) accelerate the cancerous process of “limitless” growth leading to systemic collapse.

[Author]

Posts