ISIS wants Donald Trump to attack them.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Hi guys.

I’m glad that Trump got elected. I’m still sad that my main man Ron Paul retired before ever getting in … but Donald Trump is pretty close … but he’s not close enough.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/11/10/extremists-celebrate-donald-trump-election-win/93580822/

Dear Donald Trump: Your war against ISIS is exactly what ISIS wants. It feeds them and their radicalism. Don’t try to fix the war machine. Just turn it off and pull the plug.

In my previous posts, I said “If Hillary gets elected, we need to drop out of the military and protest the war machine.” With Trump in power, this is still very important.

Trump is going to dismantle most of the war machine … but now we need to finish it off with direct, grassroots action.

Ron Paul was extremely intelligent but he never got elected because he lacked charisma. Ron Paul is old, boring and nerdy. That’s why nobody listened to him despite his genius. Trump has charisma. That’s how he got elected. Now that Trump has secured his position of power, he needs to cool his jets and think more.

Maybe you love Trump and maybe you hate him. Either way, do not get sucked into this conflict unless you want to see another sequel to the Bush administration.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

I think he should join forces with Russia, in order to carpet bomb the Daesh.

I agree that he should use the war machine with great care and consideration, but allowing the Daesh to roam FREE? Off the table. The Daesh needs to be terminated.

After that, not only US armed forces shoudl be kept more “lean” (and meaner), but also NATO forces, since close cooperation with Russia, less assests to waste in futile wars and less “allied” (should I say money sink holes) armed forces presence in American-backed countries, like japan and many others, are the order of the day.

Russia is not a threat. Not anymore.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

On a more profound note. The same people that funded Hillary Clinton Etc are the ones funding Isis. Isis appears to be in lockstep with the feminist movement. So I don’t understand what your point is. Sounds a little fishy Tumi

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

TattooDave wrote:

So I don’t understand what your point is. Sounds a little fishy Tumi

I think he is a more left-leaning brother.

That is maybe why he thinks that Trump should leave the Daesh alone.

But, leaving them alone could an WILL backfire. So, no qarters should be cut for the goat f~~~ers. Let’s bomb the crap out of them, and after the job is done, go back home.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Bombing them will only radicalize more Muslims. It’s like chopping the heads off a hydra.

The key to defeating radical Islam is this: Defense, Not Offense

In the past, I have supported Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration. I stand by that.

We tried blowing them up under Bush and Obama. This only led to greater troubles. We need end offensive tactics. Instead, we need to rely on hardcore defensive tactics.

This transition will be hard becasue Lockheed Martin and big oil benefit from constant war, but defense will be better for the American people.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

Uintatherium wrote:

Bombing them will only radicalize more Muslims. It’s like chopping the heads off a hydra.

The key to defeating radical Islam is this: Defense, Not Offense

In the past, I have supported Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration. I stand by that.

We tried blowing them up under Bush and Obama. This only led to greater troubles. We need end offensive tactics. Instead, we need to rely on hardcore defensive tactics.

This transition will be hard becasue Lockheed Martin and big oil benefit from constant war, but defense will be better for the American people.

Yep, defense is ALWAYS better, brother. But, a preemptive strike sometimes is the best defense of it all. I don’t know if you are a GI, or if you are on other branches, but the thing is: It is WAY harder to fight an irregular war (and by irregular I mean not “common” wars, with two armies in an open battlefield). Irregular wars are f~~~ed up, because it is f~~~ing hard to tell who is a threat and who is not. Those goat f~~~ers can go into hiding, drop their weapons at a garbage bin, and pass as a “law abiding citizen” in a heart beat, just to shoot you in the back after you checked them, like the Green Weenie learned in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The ban is just a start, but after the ban is in place, that will p~~~ them off, way more. Obama bombed the s~~~ out of Assad, not DAESH. Obama WAS FUNDING THE DAESH, NOT FIGHTING THEM. Putin is the one bombing the crap out of them, and I am damn sure that Trump should (and will) do the same.

Thre is no way to defend against them. Look at how many things were put in action, like the Patriot Act under Obama’s, and not even a single s~~~ has been averted in his administration…

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

The Patriot Act solved nothing because Obama let too many foreigners in.

Letting foreigners into the country is one thing. Letting p~~~ed-off foreigners in is another thing … especially if they are p~~~ed at America.

9/11 happened because we provoked Middle Eastern people and then let them into the country. All of this could have been avoided if they had been kept out of the country. Bombing them was a waste of time and the situation was made worse.

I know why we are really bombing them: Lockheed Martin wanted it that way. They literally make money selling weapons of war. War has become a business. That’s the real reason why it seems continuous.

That brings me to the Republican establishment. They hate Trump because he isn’t as militaristic as the other Republicans. Lockheed Martin and Halliburton are shaking in their boots.

Additionally, many big businesses are terrified of Trump’s immigration policy. These big businesses want more employees, even if some of them are dangerous. Notice how most people who die in terrorist attacks are in the middle or lower class. That’s because the super-rich can afford safe neighborhoods. They never have to face the beast that they lobbied for.

The Patriot Act failed at defending America because it wasn’t even a defensive maneuver. It was a mere power grab. Cutting off the immigration is a real defensive maneuver.

Trump has a lot of integrity. He is a step in the right direction, but he still isn’t perfect.

Another Thing: I found someone else who is happy about Trump’s victory.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Dayak_Kanayatn.jpg

Tell Me: What has Israel ever done for us?

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[BeerParticipant 11832]

The problem with modern American wars is we aren’t actually fighting for anything. We go over, beat some people up, try to set them up with a puppet democracy, then spend more money building their country back up than we spent smashing it.

If we are going to go to war we should go in and take the place over and take all their natural resources and profit off it. Otherwise, we are better off just carpet bombing them and saying listen f~~~ers, if you hit us again, we’ll carpet bomb you again, have a nice life and don’t f~~~ with us, but what we are doing now is just stupid.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Beer wrote:

The problem with modern American wars is we aren’t actually fighting for anything. We go over, beat some people up, try to set them up with a puppet democracy, then spend more money building their country back up than we spent smashing it.

If we are going to go to war we should go in and take the place over and take all their natural resources and profit off it. Otherwise, we are better off just carpet bombing them and saying listen f~~~ers, if you hit us again, we’ll carpet bomb you again, have a nice life and don’t f~~~ with us, but what we are doing now is just stupid.

We don’t need their natural resources. We have more than enough Uranium.

In Western countries (especially Canada and Australia) there is enough uranium to keep us going for centuries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_uranium_production

There is no good reason for us attack the Middle East … at all. It’s none of our business. We just need to wall ourselves off until they promise to calm the f~~~ down. How long will that take? Who cares? I can wait.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[Anonymous 24]

Yea, I am not cool with any of these wars as well, also, a big Ron Paul guy…

We keep arming these f~~~ers over and over then going in and killing em all after they have served their purpose. Clearly one big f~~~ing racket, on my dime, f~~~ off. Play defense instead of favorites over there. We just create more terrorism by f~~~ing around nonstop, then export if via refugees into the E.U.? Yea, as if that doesn’t sound like a recipe for disaster. What it really sounds like is a recipe for eternal war…. Israel will be just fine, also, let them pay for all this s~~~, not us. War for the reasons we have been waging them is the very definition of Fascism. Big government and even bigger Military f~~~ing around everywhere for currency protection (Libya) and oil interests (entire Mid-East) is a f~~~ing joke. Leave other countries alone, it is just that simple. The U.S. could be a virtual UTOPIA for all citizens if we had spent the money from war on building up the country instead. We are talking Trillions of dollars here…

[Author]

Posts