Is porn toxic?

Topic by Artboy99

Artboy99

Home Forums MGTOW Central Is porn toxic?

This topic contains 60 replies, has 36 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 1 year, 10 months ago.

Viewing 61 post (of 61 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #775056

    Anonymous
    0

    Nope. It’s a tool for abating hormones. It’s the single best tool for staying monk if you can’t afford a doll.

    Agreed. “Toxicity” as an analogy works better for birth control pills than porn. If anything, porn is the antidote to the Pill…porn is the opposite of toxic. The Pill is toxic because it gave hypergamic broads a way to avoid the cost risk of sex, and a license to give out free sex samples to Chads world wide. As a result, with aid from Welfare and Divorce Rape Court, and a 40 yr financialized debt-driven retail economy, broads became promiscuous riders of the c~~~ carousel, and divorce rapists.

    Viewed economically, porn functions as a technically inferior yet serviceable substitute for real broads, who now represent a large financial risk to men. Broads who spend too long Alpha f~~~ing, and hit the Wall, look desperately for Beta Bucks to be Dads because they can’t get an Alpha Cad to commit. However, the betas and former alphas have gotten smart and know marriage is like buying a timeshare condo in downtown Riyadh. Not only is it too expensive, it’s too risky to your (mental) health.

    So there is a now a standoff that the causes a population loss to the human species. A Sex Cold War that drains resources and lowers population to be sure, but what is the alternative in the current technological state?…all men getting divorce raped? Broads taking over manufacturing? That’s the equivalent of a nuclear hot war…mutually assured destruction.

    No, the Sex Cold War is here to stay unless a true nuclear war renders the world a smattering of tribes…only then will men re-assert dominance, but only until the broads get the Pill back. Maybe the only peaceful way things get back to prosperity is promiscuous broads eventually get de-selected by generations of childlessness. If MGTOW’s hold the strike for generations, broads will have to capitulate and sign a legal innovation which amounts to Enforceable Pre-nups, ie, by strong Supreme Court precedent. Short of that, the human population will decline, and maybe it should if a Socialist Matriarchy is the best we can come up with.

Viewing 61 post (of 61 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.