Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Is living with a woman a form of sexual deviancy?
This topic contains 18 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by
sidecar 2 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
The title is pretty telling.
I just add some considerations:
When a man and a woman live together (marriage contract or palimony hidden contract / cohabitation) the level of testosterone of the man drops (and the level of testosterone of the woman increase): this is, clearly, bad for men’s health.
Even if his sexual desire drops (due dropping level of testosterone) the man isn’t going to get all the sex he wants, it’s always less than expected / desired, usually much less.
Women cannot, generally, consent to sex with men: too often sex with an “adult” (over 21, but still treated as a child in most courts) woman isn’t so different from pedophilia – “women and children”, all such things, you know…
Lack of regular sexual release cause cancer to the prostate, prostate cancer isn’t exactly healthy.
I stop here, looking foward for more thoughts from you all.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Nop, just a form of selft destruction.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
Nop, just a form of selft destruction.
That’s right, it’s a form of masochism extremized to the point of self-destruction.
Still a sexual deviancy, “sexual” due living with a woman is supposed to have a sexual basis.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Living with a woman is a form of self delusion and self imposed imprisonment.
The only sexual ‘deviancy’ that exists is a man convincing himself that Pumpkin is monogamous when he actually knows that she is cheating and banging other guys.
No, living with a woman is just legal suicide.
Frank V.
Woman stabs boyfriend = no jail. She’s “too bright for jail”.
Man grabs breasts during “consensual” (*) sex with a woman = jailed, putted on sex offenders registry.
Both were bright students in medicine.
We’re talking about such two so different human beings living together: how it cannot be a deviancy for the man?
(*) “consensual” with quotation marks because women cannot truly consent to sex with men.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Order of sexual deviancy if you define deviancy as being those that interfere with every day functioning. Domestic violence is certainly a measure of dysfunction or deviancy in a relationship.
If we believe this then the order of deviancy of living together based on domestic violence altercations is.
Gay male couple < Hetero couple < gay female couple
The more females the more deviancy.
And two women living together is double deviancy as the rates of domestic violence in lesbian couples is orders of magnitude more than heterosexual or gay male partners.
Gay male partners are the least deviant form of living together as there are less conflicts as measured by cases of domestic violence.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Order of sexual deviancy if you define deviancy as being those that interfere with every day functioning. Domestic violence is certainly a measure of dysfunction or deviancy in a relationship.
If we believe this then the order of deviancy of living together based on domestic violence altercations is.
Gay male couple < Hetero couple < gay female couple
The more females the more deviancy.
And two women living together is double deviancy as the rates of domestic violence in lesbian couples is orders of magnitude more than heterosexual or gay male partners.
Gay male partners are the least deviant form of living together as there are less conflicts as measured by cases of domestic violence.
I agree with your reasoning, but heterosexual men cannot become gay (just like gays cannot become heterosexual), so bringing up gay couples seems rather pointless.
Definition of sexual deviancy, medical definition:
https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sexual+deviancysexual deviancy Sexual excitement to the point of erection and/or orgasm, when the object of that excitement is considered abnormal in the context of the learned societal norms (paraphilia).
Types
Exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism, pedophilia, sexual masochism, sexual sadism, transvestic fetishism, voyeurism, paraphilia, “not otherwise specified”.Naturally, societal norms tell us that a man living with a woman is normal and healthy…but…note the bolded types.
Women are closer to children when it comes to responsibility under the law and within the courts (pussy pass, sentencing gap, even openly gendered laws in some countries – including UK/Israel/India: women cannot rape men), women have much less responsibility than men (and asking them the same level of responsibility is “misogyny”), “women and children”, such things = something something pedophilia in the strong desire to live with a woman.
Masochism = no need to explain why living with a woman is rooted in being a masochist for a man.
Voyeurism = not sure about that, but how would you call the desire of sleep next to a body you’re strongly attracted to, while knowing that you’re going to NOT get sexual release 5-in-7 nights (on average, it’s even worse for many men within marriage contract) even if that’s hurting your health (increase the risk of prostate cancer and lowers your level of testosterone)? Masochism, that’s sure, but there’s even an heavy hint of voyeurism.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
You are correct, I was using the wrong definition. I was describing such severe sexual problems that occur in relationships that leads to dysfunction of the relationship, thus a real problem.
Like drug use. Generally not a problem until it affects your job, family and health.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
EricL,
The physiological cause of a man’s testosterone dropping after getting married is due to him thinking he does not have to compete anymore since he feels like he secured a mate/pussy.
A woman’s testosterone increases because to her the game has only just begun and she continues to keep any and all potentially better options open. (Hypergamy)

Anonymous12In the eyes of the law if the man and woman are living as husband and wife (ie it is a sexual/romantic relationship) then she can screw him over when they break up. That is how it works down here anyway.
So living with a woman in that respect is just like marriage whether you are married or not.
Sexual deviancy? I don’t think so, just a poor choice. Married or otherwise.
In the eyes of the law if the man and woman are living as husband and wife (ie it is a sexual/romantic relationship) then she can screw him over when they break up. That is how it works down here anyway.
So living with a woman in that respect is just like marriage whether you are married or not.
Sexual deviancy? I don’t think so, just a poor choice. Married or otherwise.
I call it sexual deviancy because the rationale for most men, when they get into a palimony hidden contract or they sign a marriage contract is: “I’m going to have a regular sexual life, I’m going to have sex almost all days”.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

Anonymous12In the eyes of the law if the man and woman are living as husband and wife (ie it is a sexual/romantic relationship) then she can screw him over when they break up. That is how it works down here anyway.
So living with a woman in that respect is just like marriage whether you are married or not.
Sexual deviancy? I don’t think so, just a poor choice. Married or otherwise.
I call it sexual deviancy because the rationale for most men, when they get into a palimony hidden contract or they sign a marriage contract is: “I’m going to have a regular sexual life, I’m going to have sex almost all days”.
That is the traditional idea though. Man takes care of woman so they can raise a family, work on farm/family business, become wealthy. And yes he gets to have sex. They take care of each other.
Modern thinking has made all of that seem perverse or deviant but it is actually the way it worked for centuries.
In the eyes of the law if the man and woman are living as husband and wife (ie it is a sexual/romantic relationship) then she can screw him over when they break up. That is how it works down here anyway.
So living with a woman in that respect is just like marriage whether you are married or not.
Sexual deviancy? I don’t think so, just a poor choice. Married or otherwise.
I call it sexual deviancy because the rationale for most men, when they get into a palimony hidden contract or they sign a marriage contract is: “I’m going to have a regular sexual life, I’m going to have sex almost all days”.
That is the traditional idea though. Man takes care of woman so they can raise a family, work on farm/family business, become wealthy. And yes he gets to have sex. They take care of each other.
Modern thinking has made all of that seem perverse or deviant but it is actually the way it worked for centuries.
My point is that it doesn’t “seem” perverse in actual society, my point is that IT’S ACTUALLY perverse in actual society.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
In our natural state, males would have more than one female.
Monogamy only comes in with urbanisation.Its asking for a prison sentence
What people call "love" is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed. It hits hard, then it slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage. Your parents are gonna do it. Break the cycle. Rise above. Focus on science.
Is poking yourself in the eye with a blunt stick a form of sexual deviancy?
Is poking yourself in the eye with a blunt stick a form of sexual deviancy?
Sure, if you do it to achieve the goal to have a regular sexual life (the main reason why so many men sign a marriage contract or enter in a palimony hidden contract / cohabitation)
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Sure, if you do it to achieve the goal to have a regular sexual life
How, exactly, would poking yourself in the eye with a blunt stick help you achieve a regular sexual life?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
