Is Bachelor Tax looming in the future?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

First: in Italy THERE WAS bachelor tax. And it has been proposed again, recently, at local level

A bachelor tax was levied in Italy from 1927 until the fall of Mussolini in Rome in 1943.

In a speech given by Benito Mussolini on May 26, 1927, the tax is referenced to have garnered 40 to 50 million lira, but that the purpose of the tax was a race-based pronatalist policy:

Let us be quite clear: what are 40 million Italians compared to 90 million Germans and 200 million Slavs? What are 40 million Italians compared to 40 million Frenchmen, plus 90 million inhabitants of their colonies, or 46 million Englishmen plus 450 million people who live in their colonies?

[7]

By 1936, Italian bachelors paid nearly double their normal income tax rate.[19]

In 1999, the mayor of Vastogirardi, Italy proposed to reinstitute a bachelor tax locally.

Read that article: 50 unmarried men and 20 unmarried women.

The taxation had been impossible to enforce because unmarried women complained.

A bachelor tax will be one of the things pushed by the alliance feminists-tradcons in the near future, just afater criminalization of men who purchase sex from sex workers, and also strict limitations on pornography.
A bachelor tax is almost impossible to enforce, not because it’s “uncostitutional”: being uncostitutional is quite easy to bypass in a gynocentric society.
A bachelor tax is impossible to enforce because:
* It’s very likely to hit even unmarried women.
* Cohabitations would be necessarly excluded.
* Gay marriage and gay cohabitation is perfectly legal.
* HOW ABOUT DIVORCED MEN (and women)? It’s a very complicated issue: a divorced man paying bachelor tax would, for sure, cut alimonies to his ex wife, and she would have to pay the bachelor tax, too, while having less alimony 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

We already have a man tax in Obama care. Under the old system it was recognized that women use up 80% of health care visits so women were charged a bit more than men for health insurance.

If you listen to Hitlary’s ads and in the debate she said that she was going to have men and women pay the same amount.

That’s men subsidizing women’s consumption of health care dollars. A tax…directed by Obama/Hitlary…that transfers health care dollars from men to women.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

MrMe wrote:

I will work minimum hours, as few as possible. Just enough hours to pay for my house and food and activities… I want to be in the lowest tax bracket possible.

You are best off just crushing all the hours you can for a few years and then living off investment income. You can make almost 40k in capital gains before you have to pay any taxes, plus you add the standard deduction on top of that…you could literally end up with 45k a year and pay absolutely 0 taxes on it. No income tax just because the brackets are different than for payroll, and since its not payroll you won’t have to pay medicare or ss taxes. You’ll pay more in taxes while working but over the course of your life you’ll have to work less hours and you’ll end up paying less taxes.

I got plenty of coworkers and friends that think I’m nuts when I tell them I could retire comfortably making 40k a year in dividends, like that isn’t enough money, but that is about 3300 a month after “taxes”(that I wouldn’t be paying). It would probably work out to about the same as a guy making 55k a year punching a clock for his money paying taxes, and 55k is more than a lot of working people make yet they all seem to get by.

Veritech Ace wrote:

Dude Wake UP! There already is a bachelor tax in America. It’s why single there is one tax table for single people and another for married people, and of course the single person tax rate is higher.

Plus the extra tax benefits of having children. Single guys don’t get any benefit from this, but couples and single moms most certainly do. We know the deal, they won’t come out and say its a bachelor tax, we’re going to tax bachelors more, instead they tax us all more then reimburse the non-bachelors…big f~~~ing deal, its effectively the same thing.

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

I would just pay the tax. Cheaper and more serene than getting married.

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

We already have a man tax in Obama care. Under the old system it was recognized that women use up 80% of health care visits so women were charged a bit more than men for health insurance.

If you listen to Hitlary’s ads and in the debate she said that she was going to have men and women pay the same amount.

That’s men subsidizing women’s consumption of health care dollars. A tax…directed by Obama/Hitlary…that transfers health care dollars from men to women.

There are even worse man taxes, like various insurances charging more on men, and so on.
But those aren’t the bachelor tax: the bachelor tax have to be very clear, because its purpose is forcing men to marry.
Obamacare hurts married and unmarried men equally – also by hurting married men Obamacare hurts even their wives, because less money married men have then less money they wives have.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts