Interview with author of a book: "Single by Choice" – hamster galore

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Found this gem. This bitch explains away why marriage rates are dropping from a woman’s perspective and how it’s a liberating accomplishment for women.
You can almost hear the wheel squeaking as you read it.
It also jumps at you how brainwashed these women are – believing that being just like a man is somehow liberating and empowering.

Link

Here is the author (who by the way is married)

Some excerpts that made me cringe the most:

“The choice not to marry isn’t necessarily a conscious rejection of marriage,” Traister tells Fresh Air’s Terry Gross. “It is [about] the ability to live singly if an appealing marriage option doesn’t come along.”

– so in her mind it’s not because women are trash to whom normal men stopped proposing to, it’s because men are unappealing and broke pieces of trash these days

“Women are living independently, but we don’t yet have the social and economic policies behind us to support that independence.”

Really, bitch? you don’t have those yet?

When I say “the choice to not marry,” that doesn’t always translate into “I am a woman and I am deciding that I am not going to get married,” or “I am rejecting marriage.” The choice to not marry can also mean: “I would really like to marry or to fall in love or to meet someone, but I haven’t met someone who I feel is going to improve on the life that I am building and making on my own.”

…or it means that you are hypergamous bitch who hit the wall, but the prince charming is nowhere to be found

On how her experience of getting married differed from her mother’s

I was 35 years old. I had just published or was about to publish my first book, which was about women in the 2008 election. I had a career that I was extremely committed to, that was at its most robust point at that time. I had just given up the apartment that I had rented and where I had lived by myself for five blissful years of living by myself in a relatively small studio apartment; and I was so keenly aware of how different this transition in my life — from being a single person to a married person — was for me than, I believe, it had been for my mother.

My mother also had a thriving career. She got a Ph.D. and was an English professor and was one of the first four women hired by her English department. But she had been married to my father at 21, days after she graduated from college. Marriage had marked the beginning of her adult life, and she had done all of the professional development, the making of friends, the building of the social circles, within the institution of marriage, while married to my father. They’re still married; they’ve had a very happy marriage. But marriage was something I was doing well into my adult life. It felt that it meant something different to me

She pities her mother for marrying early and staying married. I pity the fool who married this broad at 35.

There is other stuff in there, but I just can’t do read this article any longer – my head hurts

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[GrumpyParticipant]

I find it remarkable that a woman can straight faced say/promote that she “chose to be single” when no man wants her to begin with.
I guess when your options are
1. single
2. single with a cat
3. single with a bird
4. single because no other living organism can stand being around you.

You can choose #1.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[experiencedParticipant]

Single by numerous choices, of men, to not get near her.

She was mentally constipated,
got confused
and took Imodium.

How the f~~~ do you “support” “independence” ??
She’s an ox moron.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[NotMyProblemParticipant 965]

Russky wrote:

“Women are living independently, but we don’t yet have the social and economic policies behind us to support that independence.”

That’s rich…

As usual, women want to be strong & independent… except Men should pay for it…

Durrrr

Not my property... Not my problem

[Anonymous 3]

If women actually believed the bulls~~~ they spewed, they’d be the biggest supporters of MGTOW. Instead they try to take the site down and try to harass MGTOW back onto the plantation.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

Yeah! I read a similar article about the reasons women were marrying less today than in previous generations. Took hamstering to an altogether new level. It too took the same slant. Good men were just not to be found any more because women now had better education, better earning power, could have and raise kids without a man. Men were slugs and if a good one wasn’t in the picture so be it. They refused to admit that maybe, just maybe, the women didn’t have a choice because men were just not proposing any more. If Mr. Right didn’t come along women would’t shed a tear. Life with cats was just as good.

But you go on blogs like Reddit Forever Alone Women, and the desperation and fear of women is palpable, knowing that men are walking away from women, commitment and marriage in droves. Men now know the risks (infidelity, paternity fraud, divorce rape, domestic violence, and the list goes on) and the biggest boon to men turns out to be a feminist desire; No Fault Divorce.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

I know way more women that loathe being single than men. For all my single male friends, family members, and coworkers who are male, its just like eh, I’ll date if I stumble upon something worthy but until then I’ll just enjoy hobbies, hanging out with the guys, going on trips, etc.

Women that fall into those same categories…all they f~~~ing do is monkey branch because they can’t stand the thought of being single. If they aren’t monkey branching from “relationships” that rarely last more than 6 months, they are just getting pumped and dumped by Chads and slutting it up to the max. Usually at some point between 28 and 32 they become absolutely rabid for marriage and babies, and if they have not become successful in that mission by mid 30s they have a “whoops” baby. Funny how they didn’t get pregnant by accident and decide to keep it when they were riding the carousel hard at 23, but at 33, after they’ve met the wall of course, they get knocked up by accident to the first dumbass with a good job who will blow a load in em.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I chose the firing squad. I chose the bullets. I chose the guns.

I chose to be exicuted.

The logic is astounding.

My body my .. BANG

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

“Women are living independently, but we don’t yet have the social and economic policies behind us to support that independence.”

Oh for f~~~’s sake.

If it needs to be supported, then IT’S NOT INDEPENDENCE!

Is feminism’s complete failure to comprehend the meaning of words like “independent” and “equality” intentional? Or are they really that stupid?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

By independent – they mean independent from any particular man. To achieve that they depend on the state instead.
By equality – they mean equal outcomes.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[RoyDalParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

If it needs to be supported, then IT’S NOT INDEPENDENCE!

How true that is. Oh yes, how true!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

If women actually believed the bulls~~~ they spewed, they’d be the biggest supporters of MGTOW. Instead they try to take the site down and try to harass MGTOW back onto the plantation.

Great point from Phoenix.

sidecar wrote:

If it needs to be supported, then IT’S NOT INDEPENDENCE!

Explaining that to a woman would be like trying to teach a duck how to buy low & sell high.

—-

On what she means by “single by choice”

Woman LOVE to pretend to be “single by choice” or unmarried by choice, but they are lying frauds, because women don’t choose. They typically wait and expect to be chosen.

Sorry bitch but that’s not one thing you get to “choose”.
( Lay down before you hurt yourself. Amateur. )

• Women can “choose” when sex happens
• Women can “choose” to work – or not work.
• Women can “choose” to have children – or not have children.
• Women can “choose” to be whores – or not.

What you don’t get to do is pretend you’re “unmarried by choice”. You’re already unmarried by nature and you don’t need to do a f~~~ing thing to die unmarried. You will always be unmarried unless a man chooses you. SINCE YOU DON’T PROPOSE AND MAKE MEN OFFERS THEY CAN’T REFUSE…. THE IDEA THAT YOU’RE “SINGLE BY CHOICE” IS BULLS~~~.

Since you can’t be “married by choice”…..
you can therefore not be “single by choice”.

You are single by default. And that’s the way you will die. Women can’t even be “single by choice” for a f~~~ing day. They ALWAYS monkeys branch from one man to the next – if they can. If they are fat fugly, they can’t. But that’s not by choice. They always would if they could.

Her hamster is the size of an Elephant.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

sidecar wrote:

“Women are living independently, but we don’t yet have the social and economic policies behind us to support that independence.”

Oh for f~~~’s sake.

If it needs to be supported, then IT’S NOT INDEPENDENCE!

Is feminism’s complete failure to comprehend the meaning of words like “independent” and “equality” intentional? Or are they really that stupid?

That’s one of the biggest flaws with this whole “strong, independent woman” perspective. If you need the government or a family or a friend or a husband or wife to help you in your ordeals, you aren’t independent. You aren’t strong. You’re lazy. The bar got set lower just for you, and you require assistance, someone to hold your f~~~ing hand. There is no such thing as a “strong, independent” anything anymore, in my honest opinion.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

*Trying hard to be super positive and not gie a f~~~ at the same time*..

So women are becoming independent. Great!! Good fr them.

In the article, some Susan said something about ‘a dry period where women woud never marry’ <- won’t this actually help our cause? I don’t see anything wrong with that, do you people?

One of the problems of the society is that it gives a lot of f~~~s for women. And I’m not even speaking literally.

Don’t you need to hold me. I can climb up this mountain by myself. I don’t need your help

Oh, and make sure you tie my lifeline tight; real tight so that I don’t fall down. What? You can’t? BE A MAN and help me.

Help me so that I could brag about how I don’t need your help.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Varun wrote:

In the article, some Susan said something about ‘a dry period where women woud never marry’

I would ask Susan, how’s that a problem?. Men have been running from the altar since the beginning of time. Women fail a cost/benefit analysis in marriages and relationships and they act like not marrying is some kind of loss.

Ladies, you can’t take value away when you never had any.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

The brainless cow missed out on marriage and childbearing but somehow, that’s the way she planed it?
She would rather deny reality then admit that she’s a loser with no future.

[Dunn GoofdParticipant 119]

I think the problem lies here is that these women do not see freedom as a feat of survival but as a feeling, something about the moment.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I thinks it’s great. Females don’t what to get married anymore.

All men are saved.

Just stay away from my taxes.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I agree. When women don’t want to get married and want to go to work and do their own thing – men get liberated, not women.
The side effect of that, though,- is the ever growing nanny state and boys indoctrinated into straight gynocentrism by single mothers

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Keymaster wrote:

Explaining that to a woman would be like trying to teach a duck how to buy low & sell high.

Don’t I know it. That’s never in doubt.

The question is whether or not this is intentional on her part, or simply because, like a duck, she has a brain the size of a walnut.

[Author]

Posts