I love how women think they contribute to man's "success"

[Anonymous 42]

EscapedMentalPatient wrote:

For assuming that you are a woman, or for attempting to silence you, I apologize to you. On these point alone. I don’t stand behind or support your remarks, I’ll be crystal clear on that, for my own sake. It was unfair of me to pounce on you, DukeToga. It won’t happen again.

F~~~ that Willy, Tioga, I say toss each other on the grille and see what the smoke smells like, fish or meat! If it’s fish it goes from the grille into the fire, If its’ meat, we all eat!

It’s better to smoke a little meat, rather than eat fish!

Keep the forging hammers pounding out the truth! F~~~ whoever’s hand gets flattened now and then.

We’re not politically correct boot lickers, this is philosophical FIGHT CLUB! Reek of any kind of feminism here and it’s black eye for sure!

 

[Anonymous 5]

EscapedMentalPatient wrote:

DukeToga wrote:

Not the place for comment like that I get caught up in the moment but I don’t feel that my statement falls far from the tree of human nature. If so you feel a “post” was a little too unorthodox. Well than s~~~ am sorry I fouled your eyes.

Very obviously, the fault here is mine, DukeToga. I am not a moderator at this place, and I shouldn’t behave as such. I shouldn’t act on a principle of my own, while projecting it on to another person.

Looking back, I’m completely out of line on this point. No one assigned me such a role, and my assuming it in any capacity is an insult to the fellows of this site, yourself included.

For assuming that you are a woman, or for attempting to silence you, I apologize to you. On these point alone.

I don’t stand behind or support your remarks, I’ll be crystal clear on that, for my own sake.

It was unfair of me to pounce on you, DukeToga.

It won’t happen again.

Hey I can’t explain to you how I felt after I read that and more over what idiot I am for saying those things (I learned a lesson). I have read your post’s before.. – Man it felt like utter hell hearing that from you (A respected member/teacher) I really did believe what you said for a moment cause never really taken anything to heart outside of my Job or outside of this site. More over I needed that – This isn’t just a website. I hope that we can be progressively friendly to each other in the coming months.

Duke.

[EscapedMentalPatientParticipant 1489]

Anonymous wrote:

Hey I can’t explain to you how I felt after I read that and more over what idiot I am for saying those things (I learned a lesson). I have read your post’s before.. – Man it felt like utter hell hearing that from you (A respected member/teacher) I really did believe what you said for a moment cause never really taken anything to heart outside of my Job or outside of this site. More over I needed that – This isn’t just a website. I hope that we can be progressively friendly to each other in the coming months.

Duke.

I’ve learned a lesson too, Duke. I shouldn’t be chiming in and potentially ruining a place to go for yourself, or for other guys in this particular oasis. A very much needed place, where we can display our respective thoughts. I hold no ill will against you at all Duke; again, this was an instance of me speaking about something which I shouldn’t have. I’m sure we’ll get along just fine.

Lately, this has everything to do with me, and nothing to do with anyone else. There are times when I need to do less talking and more reading/listening. I’ve not been focusing on my work enough the past while, and that’s something which is probably leading me astray and getting me a little on edge. I’ve been pretty negative about a lot of stuff. And I’ve got other things going on that aren’t exactly peachy at the moment, like many of us.

That being said, I need a break, and time to reflect. We all need this every now and again! I need to channel my energy into work at the moment, but will definitely be around to read from time to time!

Cheers brothers.

[endgameBlocked 26]

Y

Canadian SportsFan wrote:

A female friend just posted this tripe to FB. I’m looking at the men I know in my life who were successful and got married. Funny thing, they were ALL successful (financially) before marriage.

The concept of a women starting a relationship with a man who exhibits all the qualities she wants, but lives check to check, is essentially extinct, or exceedingly rare. Truth today is, more women are employed than men. Employment for males is more sporadic for the majority of population. Females have been forced to choose the right partner, or take the easy settle, and this mating context is new for females. Problem is, males are supposed to choose, and women are supposed to explore or decline. The traditional partnering context still exists, but at a reduced percentage compared to past generations.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Anonymous wrote:

what idiot I am for saying those things (I learned a lesson)

…said no woman ever anywhere.

And that, right there, is how we know the Duke isn’t female.

[LowKeyParticipant 702]

endgame wrote:

Truth today is, more women are employed than men.

Any Source regarding this?

endgame wrote:

Problem is, males are supposed to choose, and women are supposed to explore or decline. The traditional partnering context still exists, but at a reduced percentage compared to past generations.

This used to be the case but considering how the feminazis out there tries to strip men out of their manliness and not to mention the whackjobs, one can not just put all the blame to men.

The damage of extreme feminist ideas on men is significant and its only when men starts to take up responsibilities for their lives thats only when men can mitigate the damage that are being done upon them.

Don't let defeat, defeat you; Let defeat be your greatest teacher.

[timbannisterParticipant 8]

You are correct. All the eviden ce is women do not contribute to great successes but are very often the cause of failure by men who were stupid and unenlightened enough to associate with them?.

Can we look at the facts. Virtually everything that has ever been invented throughout history of Planet earth has been invented by a male without any involvement with a women. Every idea that has been founded and become successful throughout the history of the world has been founded by a male. The most successful men in history who achieved that success did so by not having any involvement with women. The Islamic religion for example was founded by a man called Mohamed without any help from any women and that religion is still run exclusively by males today, women being treated as inferior species. So that Faith seems to be very MGTOW orientated? That example today is followed by all the factions of Islam including the Shia, the Sunni and ISIS are all MGTOW?

Moses did not have any women alongside him when he led the Israelites out of Egypt. The guy that started Christianity called Jesus never had any women in his team He called “disciples” He seems to have understood that involvement with a woman or women leads you to fail in your life, so Jesus was surely a very much MGTOW type of person too? His successors have mostly continued on that line like in Roman Catholicism today the Pope is always male.No females have ever been allowed in that job? RC priests are male so supporting that hypothesis, But today we hear the Church of England have allowed women to become Bishops for first time ever, and I will have a bet with anybody that signifies the forthcoming failure of that denomination?

The founder of Buddhism a guy named Siddhartha Gautama did have involvement with women and i n his early life then he was a complete FAILURE. Then he took the decision to leave her and go his own way and then he became successful in eventually finding enlightenment? So is not a key component of finding enlightenment not allowing women to influence you in your life?

[CatsPawParticipant 423]

Actually this is very true: A man is so tired of his wife that he would rather stay at work than go home.
Due to that, he becomes more successful.

That’s why I live alone and if I ever have a woman, we will have 2 homes:
One for each, the one who wants to come to the other ones home does, and does not tell the other how they should live, paint their walls or spend more on this or less on that.

[LowKeyParticipant 702]

CatsPaw wrote:

Actually this is very true: A man is so tired of his wife that he would rather stay at work than go home.
Due to that, he becomes more successful.

That’s why I live alone and if I ever have a woman, we will have 2 homes:
One for each, the one who wants to come to the other ones home does, and does not tell the other how they should live, paint their walls or spend more on this or less on that.

The tricky part is finding a woman who is ok with that, its already hard enough to find a woman that wont infringe on a man’s freedom

Don't let defeat, defeat you; Let defeat be your greatest teacher.

[aeragoanParticipant 1186]

But,they don’t remember there are more unsuccessful man than successful ones,who are married to these women…and what about successful gays???…..Jesus,Tesla not even married….women are just like delusional retarted kids…

[Sam RavenParticipant 181]

Desperation and fear from a cumdumpster eager to prove she still has value.

The proper response to this pollution on facebook would be: if they were useful to men they wouldn’t have to post this s~~~.

[Author]

Posts