I Hope 2008 Election Repeats Itself With Hillary

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9548]

I want Hillary to lose and if 2016 is anything like 2008, Hillary will lose the male vote, because she has a nagging voice. I linked a Marc Rudov video of Hillary losing to Obama for her nagging voice and pray she loses to Trump for the same reason, on top of the constant lying, calling Trump supporters “derelicts” last Friday, the email scandal, her being a bitch to everyone, and hating half of Americans.

Here’s the Rudov video:

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

Hillary for prison 2016!

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9548]

More for Hillary for the firing squad 2016.

If and when Trump gets elected, I hope he comes down harder on her than a ton of bricks!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Here’s what I don’t understand. She was issued a subpoena to provide all of her emails. AFTER the subpoena, she erased 30,000 emails. Isn’t that obstruction of justice?

If a suspected mob boss was issued a subpoena for all of his emails and then erased 30,000 of them I’m pretty sure they would add obstruction of justice to the charges and win that one in a slam dunk. It would also be offered up as proof that he was doing something wrong. So what is different in her case?

Plus she stole the primary. It’s all documented. Sarah Wasserman Schultz had to resign from being in charge of the DNC. And then Hillary hired her the next day. Why doesn’t Trump bash her for that? I’d be on that issue every day. And for those brothers who aren’t in the US, the Democratic and Republican parties are NOT part of our government, they are private entities. So a private entity stole the primary vote for the DNC, and yet Schultz is not going to jail. Someone should sue them. Oh wait, someone was going to but was gunned down in the streets of Washington DC………

Unfortunately Trump isn’t the greatest candidate either. If he was, he’d be up by 20 points. If you want to know just how bad your candidate is, look across the isle to see who they are tied with……

Order the good wine

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

@ TaxGuy,

TaxGuy wrote:

AFTER the subpoena, she erased 30,000 emails. Isn’t that obstruction of justice?

I have read a lot of your posts. You understand it. Just us, as in not you or I.

[Anonymous 3]

Trump’s the best candidate since Reagan if you want at least a step towards a return to the real America. Everything flows from immigration: law enforcement, wage stagnation, education, etc. He’s the only one that’s spoken on it truthfully since last October.

Yeah, I’m a huge Trump guy. If he loses, you Americans are in for a civil war.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

5 Point Spurgeonist wrote:

Trump’s the best candidate since Reagan if you want at least a step towards a return to the real America. Everything flows from immigration: law enforcement, wage stagnation, education, etc. He’s the only one that’s spoken on it truthfully since last October.

Yeah, I’m a huge Trump guy. If he loses, you Americans are in for a civil war.

Here’s the thing about Trump though. He doesn’t even have the support of his own party. It will be very difficult for him to get any laws passed that are even remotely out of the mainstream. I don’t even know if Congress will fund the wall, even if he has a Republican House and Senate.

Order the good wine

[Anonymous 42]

We may not have to worry about Hellery’s voice anymore, she’s been diagnosed with pneumonia!

[TuneoutParticipant]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

More for Hillary for the firing squad 2016.

If and when Trump gets elected, I hope he comes down harder on her than a ton of bricks!

Hate to be a naysayer but since Nixon was

pardoned for something much worse don’t get your hopes

up for Hillary.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

“In regard to propaganda the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or the propaganda might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies – the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.”
~Aldous Huxley

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Tuneout wrote:

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

More for Hillary for the firing squad 2016.

If and when Trump gets elected, I hope he comes down harder on her than a ton of bricks!

Hate to be a naysayer but since Nixon was

pardoned for something much worse don’t get your hopes

up for Hillary.

Nixon’s team broke into the Watergate Hotel and stole the Democratic playbook for how they would TRY to win the election. If there is any connection between her and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, they STOLE the primary. And then she hired Schultz the next day after she was found out.

I’d say what she did was worse than Watergate. There is this feeling 40 years later that Watergate was the worst scandal ever. We still don’t know if the White House played any part in the IRS denying tax exempt status to right wing groups while fast tracking left wing groups. But if there was, then Obama stole the election 4 years ago. Again, IF he did it, it was MUCH worse than Watergate.

Oh yeah, no one died because of Watergate either….

Order the good wine

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9548]

By the way, Hillary called Trump supporters “deplorable” who are racists, sexist, xenophobic, and Islam phobic. Yeah, that’s just what you want to do while running for president, hating half the country you’re suppose to be leading into the future. I hope Trump comes after her for that one. You don’t insult half the country and expect it to go well.

Like I needed another reason to hate that horrible woman!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[HitmanParticipant]

i hear the fix is in for her..
we’ll see..
i hope not.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22522]

TaxGuy wrote:

It will be very difficult for him to get any laws passed that are even remotely out of the mainstream.

Ah. But, without Congress, he can still undo Executive Orders of previous administrations, redo regulations, and enforce laws which are already on the books, but are being ignored. While a president cannot change the law, the president does control how regulations are conducted and how laws are enforced. And those are very important points.

For example. How a situation is conducted can be the difference between a swat team breaking into your home in the middle of the night, with guns drawn on you. Or, the police in regular uniforms, during the day, knocking on the door of your home, and presenting you with a warrant.

Those are big differences.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

TaxGuy wrote:

It will be very difficult for him to get any laws passed that are even remotely out of the mainstream.

Ah. But, without Congress, he can still undo Executive Orders of previous administrations, redo regulations, and enforce laws which are already on the books, but are being ignored. While a president cannot change the law, the president does control how regulations are conducted and how laws are enforced. And those are very important points.

For example. How a situation is conducted can be the difference between a swat team breaking into your home in the middle of the night, with guns drawn on you. Or, the police in regular uniforms, during the day, knocking on the door of your home, and presenting you with a warrant.

Those are big differences.

You are right, and those are big differences. Plus the Supreme Court nominees that will likely come up in the next 4 years.

There are many things that a President can do on their own. I am only pointing out that he is not a dictator. He cannot declare war on another country. And he can only sign a law that Congress has passed. He doesn’t have 100% say in what happens. AND he has p~~~ed off many in his own party.

One thing is for sure: It’s going to be an interesting 4 years.

Order the good wine

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

If Hillary loses, she’ll blame it on Bill (for failing to get more voters).

For it’s a man’s job to make his wife “happy.”

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Anonymous 3]

TaxGuy wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

TaxGuy wrote:

It will be very difficult for him to get any laws passed that are even remotely out of the mainstream.

Ah. But, without Congress, he can still undo Executive Orders of previous administrations, redo regulations, and enforce laws which are already on the books, but are being ignored. While a president cannot change the law, the president does control how regulations are conducted and how laws are enforced. And those are very important points.

For example. How a situation is conducted can be the difference between a swat team breaking into your home in the middle of the night, with guns drawn on you. Or, the police in regular uniforms, during the day, knocking on the door of your home, and presenting you with a warrant.

Those are big differences.

You are right, and those are big differences. Plus the Supreme Court nominees that will likely come up in the next 4 years.

There are many things that a President can do on their own. I am only pointing out that he is not a dictator. He cannot declare war on another country. And he can only sign a law that Congress has passed. He doesn’t have 100% say in what happens. AND he has p~~~ed off many in his own party.

One thing is for sure: It’s going to be an interesting 4 years.

Why would you want laws passed that are out of the mainstream? There should be fewer, MUCH fewer, laws passed in western society. We are where we are because of the sheer number of laws passed yearly.

“And he has p~~~ed off many in his own party” Indeed, opposing illegal immigration tends to have that effect on those that wish to stagnate wages by importing the lowest class of brown people they can find. First it was letting women work and now it’s importing others “to do what everyday Americans won’t do”. Evidently, that’s every IT job, doctors, taxi drivers and gardeners.

[Author]

Posts