"I don't hate men, but I'm still waiting for one who doesn't suck."

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

I genuinely believe that the frustration this woman feels toward men is equal in magnitude to the frustration that most guys here, including myself, feel toward women.

However, I do know that there are plenty—s~~~loads, even—of genuine, kind, caring men, who are looking for a woman who will appreciate and reciprocate those feelings. But whenever they make themselves vulnerable, they’re told they’re regarded as just friends, and then the woman has her heart broken by some “man who sucks.”

And then when the author says s~~~ like:

I think they are better as friends. Guys are a lot easier to deal with as buddies.

Is there any wonder? When she treats the men she actually gets along with as just friends, is it any wonder that her romantic partners are all jerks?

YOU GET THE BEHAVIOR YOU REWARD

You don’t like men who are emotionally distant, who treat you poorly? STOP SLEEPING WITH MEN WHO ARE EMOTIONALLY DISTANT AND WHO TREAT YOU POORLY

But no, nothing will ever change, because those guys whom she actually likes don’t give the her the ‘gina tingles.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[experiencedParticipant]

Upon awakening the thought occurred that I now see KM has addressed; these women and their articles will do more to advance mgtow than they will ever realize.

Strong / independent / truly perfect with no need to change…
And That’s Why No Man In His Right Mind Is Interested In You.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Keymaster wrote:

Execration wrote:

Her Problem, Its in the title

Give her 25 years. She’ll figure it out. Or not. Just give her 25 years. ?

Meister wrote:

People keep on posting links to articles on women blogs like that on these forums.

The C~~~ington post, Daily Mail, Telegraph etc. are some of the best creators of MGTOW material, and they do ALL the work. Take for example “Women are happy when their husbands are upset”.

A man can type that out here and say “bitch is constantly starting drama and Im getting sick of it”, but it sure elevates it to more than just “a personal opinion” when you can link to that s~~~ and there’s an explanation and science behind it.

Meister wrote:

This is some seriously retarded s~~~.
You have to either be a woman or a f~~~ing moron to read this garbage.

…. or a very smart man. You would actually have to be a retarded moron to sign a marriage contract after reading that. Or that.

Meister wrote:

Why do you read “elite daily”?

It’s like asking “why do you breathe polluted air, or eat packaged foods with carcinogens in it?” You can’t swing a dick without knocking over 5 female op-ed pieces shoved in your face. Even GQ (apparently a “men”‘s magazine) has a fat feminist cultural writer who writes for Jezebel.

I thought GQ was womens magazine.

Dailymail and telegraph are not as bad as huffingtonpost or some of these other links.

Imo there is no worth in reading this garbage. And discussing it is even worse.

Monk

[MancloudParticipant 61]

Meister wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

Execration wrote:

Her Problem, Its in the title

Give her 25 years. She’ll figure it out. Or not. Just give her 25 years.

Meister wrote:

People keep on posting links to articles on women blogs like that on these forums.

The C~~~ington post, Daily Mail, Telegraph etc. are some of the best creators of MGTOW material, and they do ALL the work. Take for example “Women are happy when their husbands are upset”.

A man can type that out here and say “bitch is constantly starting drama and Im getting sick of it”, but it sure elevates it to more than just “a personal opinion” when you can link to that s~~~ and there’s an explanation and science behind it.

Meister wrote:

This is some seriously retarded s~~~.
You have to either be a woman or a f~~~ing moron to read this garbage.

…. or a very smart man. You would actually have to be a retarded moron to sign a marriage contract after reading that. Or that.

Meister wrote:

Why do you read “elite daily”?

It’s like asking “why do you breathe polluted air, or eat packaged foods with carcinogens in it?” You can’t swing a dick without knocking over 5 female op-ed pieces shoved in your face. Even GQ (apparently a “men”‘s magazine) has a fat feminist cultural writer who writes for Jezebel.

I thought GQ was womens magazine.

Dailymail and telegraph are not as bad as huffingtonpost or some of these other links.

Imo there is no worth in reading this garbage. And discussing it is even worse.

Nobody’s keeping you here, you act like you were forced to read this. Seems like you knew that this website was full of sh*t but read the article anyway. And now you’re acting all bitter and aggressive because this article is retarded. See where I’m going? When you go watch a movie and it sucks, you don’t go yelling to the guy that sold you pop-corn.
Take your bitterness elsewhere would ya?

[JVBParticipant]

Whinge whinge whine whine…….well darling I’m waiting on a women that does suck and does it proper.

Peace is > piece.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Meister wrote:

I thought GQ was womens magazine.

You did?

GQ stands for “Gentleman’s Quarterly”.

“W” (women), “O” (Oprah), and “Vogue” are women’s magazines.

Meister wrote:

Imo there is no worth in reading this garbage. And discussing it is even worse.

Oh but there is. Because they may write it over there, but it’s intended and addressed to men.

It does a guy good to read that crap, before he finds himself writing monthly checks to a single mom who spent the last 15-20 years making s~~~ty choices.

And here’s a man’s reply to that.

Not even the women who write it know it’s crap:
“I don’t hate men, but I’m still waiting for one who doesn’t suck.”

But as long as you know it’s crap, that’s what counts.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 0]

Something that hasn’t been mentioned yet and especially by the little princess.
The common denominator in all her relationships has been her. Maybe the princess is doing it wrong??
Next up, my second favourite quote:
Lions do not care about the opinions of sheep.

[narwhalParticipant]

I found the article to be even more empty then usual. I mean, I get she’s frustrated with men, but did she even give a decent hint as to why? There is absolutely nothing constructive going on here. Nothing to be gained. You can’t even give a counter argument, because there is nothing a substance actually said.

This reads more like a diary entry then an opinion piece to be honest.

Ok. Then do it.

[experiencedParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

I found the article to be even more empty then usual. I mean, I get she’s frustrated with men, but did she even give a decent hint as to why? There is absolutely nothing constructive going on here. Nothing to be gained. You can’t even give a counter argument, because there is nothing a substance actually said.

This reads more like a diary entry then an opinion piece to be honest.

Precisely!
It’s a “Let’s cry over spilled milk party”, held at “the pity pantry”.
“Self pity is a luxury none can afford” . . . . . . apparently laydeez didn’t get the word on this, to their chagrin and our delight.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

The article is really about, “men dont care and i have no idea why.”

Which is why she hates him.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Mancloud wrote:

Meister wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

Execration wrote:

Her Problem, Its in the title

Give her 25 years. She’ll figure it out. Or not. Just give her 25 years.

Meister wrote:

People keep on posting links to articles on women blogs like that on these forums.

The C~~~ington post, Daily Mail, Telegraph etc. are some of the best creators of MGTOW material, and they do ALL the work. Take for example “Women are happy when their husbands are upset”.

A man can type that out here and say “bitch is constantly starting drama and Im getting sick of it”, but it sure elevates it to more than just “a personal opinion” when you can link to that s~~~ and there’s an explanation and science behind it.

Meister wrote:

This is some seriously retarded s~~~.
You have to either be a woman or a f~~~ing moron to read this garbage.

…. or a very smart man. You would actually have to be a retarded moron to sign a marriage contract after reading that. Or that.

Meister wrote:

Why do you read “elite daily”?

It’s like asking “why do you breathe polluted air, or eat packaged foods with carcinogens in it?” You can’t swing a dick without knocking over 5 female op-ed pieces shoved in your face. Even GQ (apparently a “men”‘s magazine) has a fat feminist cultural writer who writes for Jezebel.

I thought GQ was womens magazine.

Dailymail and telegraph are not as bad as huffingtonpost or some of these other links.

Imo there is no worth in reading this garbage. And discussing it is even worse.

Nobody’s keeping you here, you act like you were forced to read this. Seems like you knew that this website was full of sh*t but read the article anyway. And now you’re acting all bitter and aggressive because this article is retarded. See where I’m going? When you go watch a movie and it sucks, you don’t go yelling to the guy that sold you pop-corn.
Take your bitterness elsewhere would ya?

No.
Didn’t read it.

Monk

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Keymaster wrote:

Meister wrote:

I thought GQ was womens magazine.

You did?

GQ stands for “Gentleman’s Quarterly”.

“W” (women), “O” (Oprah), and “Vogue” are women’s magazines.

Meister wrote:

Imo there is no worth in reading this garbage. And discussing it is even worse.

Oh but there is. Because they may write it over there, but it’s intended and addressed to men.

It does a guy good to read that crap, before he finds himself writing monthly checks to a single mom who spent the last 15-20 years making s~~~ty choices.

And here’s a man’s reply to that.

Not even the women who write it know it’s crap:
“I don’t hate men, but I’m still waiting for one who doesn’t suck.”

But as long as you know it’s crap, that’s what counts.

Never read GQ or any magazines for that matter.

I understand your intentions of warning men and sharing stories about women is a good way to do this.

I still think reading anything on women blogs is not recommended.
It’s poison for the mind.

Monk

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

“Someday, maybe one will treat me the way I deserve.”

Read more: http://elitedaily.com/dating/waiting-for-men-hate-suck/1761327/?xid=single-term-widget
Follow us on Instagram | Elite Daily on Facebook

You’re wish is my command—here is a hand grenade with the pin pulled—that is what you deserve.

[,Participant 1301]

“I reserve the Right and Responsibility to ensure that YOU think I suck, my dahrling.”
<Its my favorite c~~~ repellent>

with joy/without hate

[Author]

Posts