Hundreds Of Women Now Selling Nudes To Raise Money For Australia’s Bushfires.

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

Just like the PETA BS.
Narcissistic virtue signalling.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Just to go full circle on this topic for a minute. Let’s say that a bunch of guys donate and get naked pictures of some thot. And she does well with it and ends up with like $100k. What are the chances that she actually donates that money to the cause? Because I’m thinking once her bank account is full she’s going to come to the revelation that she just found a new way to cash in on her looks. Pretty soon she’ll be pledging to donate money for every cause on earth and pocket the money.

Call me cynical but I don’t believe for one second that Australia would see a dime of that money unless she’s going to take the cash and buy a first class ticket to hang out on the beach there.

She just opened up a new marketing ploy as a way to sell porn. AND pocket the money. I call bulls~~~ on the whole thing.

Order the good wine

[MATRIXParticipant 2340]

^^^THIS!

There is NO wisdom in signing a contract with someone who benefits from breaking it.

[HermitParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

Just to go full circle on this topic for a minute. Let’s say that a bunch of guys donate and get naked pictures of some thot. And she does well with it and ends up with like $100k. What are the chances that she actually donates that money to the cause? Because I’m thinking once her bank account is full she’s going to come to the revelation that she just found a new way to cash in on her looks. Pretty soon she’ll be pledging to donate money for every cause on earth and pocket the money.
Call me cynical but I don’t believe for one second that Australia would see a dime of that money unless she’s going to take the cash and buy a first class ticket to hang out on the beach there.
She just opened up a new marketing ploy as a way to sell porn. AND pocket the money. I call bulls~~~ on the whole thing.

The way I read it in the article, your money goes directly to the fundraiser, not the female and you show her proof that you donated to the fundraiser and she sends you a picture for every $10.00 you donated. However, I could be mistaken.

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Hermit wrote:

The way I read it in the article, your money goes directly to the fundraiser, not the female and you show her proof that you donated to the fundraiser and she sends you a picture for every $10.00 you donated. However, I could be mistaken.

Maybe they are being genuine this time. But it wouldn’t take much work for those links to all filter back to a fake charity page and the money hits her bank account. The hamster wheel has to be spinning about how well this worked.

A drug dealer always gives you the first one for free. For a reason.

Order the good wine

[HermitParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

Hermit wrote:

The way I read it in the article, your money goes directly to the fundraiser, not the female and you show her proof that you donated to the fundraiser and she sends you a picture for every $10.00 you donated. However, I could be mistaken.

Maybe they are being genuine this time. But it wouldn’t take much work for those links to all filter back to a fake charity page and the money hits her bank account. The hamster wheel has to be spinning about how well this worked.
A drug dealer always gives you the first one for free. For a reason.

Oh I’m not saying it isn’t a scam. I was just pointing out that the article reads as though it is legitimate.

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Hermit wrote:

The way I read it in the article, your money goes directly to the fundraiser, not the female and you show her proof that you donated to the fundraiser and she sends you a picture for every $10.00 you donated. However, I could be mistaken.

At first glance, the presented article does indeed give the impression that this is perhaps the case.
Please note MY wording/phrasing, as I too could be mistaken in my impression of the article’s premise.

“CHARITY” is no longer “charity”, it is a big TAX FREE business. Does this particular charity issue tax receipts for the pornography it acts as a selling agent of?
There are hundreds if not thousands of “charities” that do not disperse a single solitary penny to the actual poster child cause at the heart of said charity effort. Others disperse pennies on the dollar, there is not a single solitary charity in which 100%, or 90%, or even 50% of the “donated” funds actually go to the implied cause, the “support” takes up the money first.
The funds are used to finance the administration of said “charitable cause”, meaning that they have to pay their costs, then employees before a single cent is forwarded to its primary purpose. Any real volunteer is just a sucker that works for them for free, because the “admin” is definitely logging the hours in a wages earned
It is all “tax free” that suckers pay to them for whatever reason.

As an example of the scam .
The fire fighters and equipment Canada sends over are paid, insured, housed and fed (paid for) by the Canadian Government, under aid to the civil power legislation clauses. The Canadian taxpayer fund this, and is a sign of compassion, largess, and “community” on behalf of Canadian citizens whether they agree or not.
Also note it is repayment for the firefighters from Australia, that came to fight forest fires in Canada.
I believe other western nations do the same.

The ones who volunteer on their own dime are not (this is true charity)

I wont pay a dime to see a nude tart with a bitchy face regardless of the cause du jour

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10907]

And I am sure every penny these bitches collect will go to help out the crisis situation.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Author]

Posts