How it should be, King and Queen.

[PokeParticipant 10]

Disclaimer: I found this piece on http://www.kindredkreators.org/role1.php. I do not embrace their teachings as they come from the a point of view that I do not favor. It is Kindred Kreators which is a religious ministry that follows the Northern Way. It is a religion of vision, power, and effort.

King: Ruler for Justice

The primary duty of a good king is to be a ruler. Being a “ruler” means two things. He must be the “ruler” who makes the “rules” those in his circle will be expected to live by. This makes him the “authority,” which comes from the root word of being the “author” and originator of the “rules.” However, as an authority, he must also be the “ruler” or “measuring stick” that conduct is measured by in his circle. In other words, he must be the standard or model of his rules by which everyone in his circle, including himself, will be judged as good. Therefore, whatever rules you come up with as a ruler of your circle, you must be sure to live by those same rules or you will experience inner and outer conflict with “good,” that is, conflict with “god.” We have all felt the offense at some time of being required to, “Do as I say, but don’t do as I do.” No honor can come from that rule, no honor from that kind of ruler, let alone to that kind of a ruler.

A Ruler’s rules must be “just,” in order for justice and peace to exist without conflict with good. “No justice” equals “no peace.” Which is the same as saying, to the degree there is no justice is the same degree there will be no peace, no harmony and “frith” within your circle or within your soul. “Just” means fair and balanced like Odin. As any parent knows, the first thing a child will raise “hue and cry” over is not being treated “fair.” It is the same for our own souls. Our own souls will cry out if we do not treat ourselves with fairness and balance.

Queen: Advocate of Mercy

The above points are true for a queen as well. However, a queen in relationship to a king need not be a mere female version of a king or duplicate his efforts. She can complement the king’s rules by providing the balance of mercy that a king needs for true justice.

“Rules” are mental, created in the head guided by reason. “Mercy” is emotional, inspired in the heart, guided by care. The king is the “head” of the kingdom, but the queen is the “heart” of the kingdom. Just as the husband has the role of being the head of the home, the woman has the role of being the heart of the home. The head needs the order of rules to maintain control. However, the head also needs the feelings of the heart to maintain life. Justice without mercy becomes cruel and heartless. Mercy without justice becomes permissive and chaotic. Both extremes are destructive. Therefore, they need each other for constructive life giving balance.

However, I do agree with the writing above concerning the King and Queen which is how each man’s circle of influence should be. We are so far from this ideal. Your thoughts please.

[QcummerParticipant 652]

me thinks they ‘should’ write for Disney

[GrumpyParticipant]

Ironic how the King is still the Protector and Provider

Those days are long gone. Anyhow in my jaundiced view, the “rulers” always have a significant other vying to usurp power in various ways. Popular opinion, not just governance, seems to win most times.

Traditionalism just isn’t worth it. But what the f~~~ do I know

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Cipher HighwindParticipant 1144]

I am not familiar with how tags work on here, but maybe if I put “bulls~~~” in the “Tags:” field below, it will be added to the list of tags above the original post.

Let’s find out.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Not every man wishes to be king of everything.

Spare me the fanciful eurocentric hog s~~~.

 

[PokeParticipant 10]

Hey Grumpy, men must be strong because we are the stronger of the sexes. We have to be because when the woman is down because of her menstrual period and when she is also down for the count of 9 months of having a child and then as she should be down for at least a minimum of two years of teaching the child, the man has to handle all other issues surrounding his home, community, state, and nation of which he is capable of doing objectively and without emotion. Those days are not gone. Those men are in a majority but all is not lost. We have to fight the institutions that have mangina, blue pill men governing them. That is where the women hang out and nag and bitch at men till the cows come home. Never give up. We go our own way because we will no longer be a part of the vaginal feminazi complex of emotions. Good idea, I will take all my toys too.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Observe the way women say things like “I want a man who knows how to treat me like a queen”.

We’ve all hear that. A thousand times.
It’s practically saturated in a woman’s psyche – expecting to be: “treated like a queen”.

But she’s not actually looking for a “king” to respect, admire and look up to.
She is expecting a man to be her subject.

She is looking to be worshipped like a queen as if a man were a commoner. Where it gets problematic for her…. is when she is forced to realize that only a KING decides who will be queen. She does not. And, whenever a KING was displeased, it was “off with her head”. Suddenly, exactly the same woman will have a very big problem with being “treated like a queen”. A King doesn’t bow down or consider his queen object of worship. Point this out to a woman and she starts to get very nervous. It’s one of those “be careful what you wish for” moments. You may eventually get it.

Consider the game of Chess. Most people think it’s came of regal strategy and nobility.
But it’s just >>> MARRIAGE.

The queen can move in any direction across the board as far as she wants, toppling any player in her path.
The King can only move one…… small…… square at a time. Virtually powerless.

“I want to be treated like a Queen!!”.

“Great! I will be the King. Now if you fail to please me, your head will roll. How’s that sound?”

She will never wish for it again.

The laughter from the audience is a dead giveaway as to what the universal understanding of “marriage” actually is:

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Trust me, it’s a lot more fun going off to be a bandit in the hills.

[PokeParticipant 10]

Exactly! That’s exactly what the piece says. Off with her head if she doesn’t tow the line. But and this is a big but… We as the kings have to act and behave like the kings we are supposed to be and not take the Queen’s bulls~~~. She can offer her advice about mercy, but it is still the King who makes the ultimate decision about EVERYTHING!!! Don’t miss the point of the kings responsibility. It is to listen to his counsel which includes his Queen, but to BE KING and make his final decision based on his knowledge and professional counsel (not yes men either) and not her nagging or wishes.

[PokeParticipant 10]

Me thinks your testosterone requires you be king of your realm of influence. “Realm of influence” is the key phrase here. Whether your realm of influence is in the gutter or over a marriage, city, state, nation, or country, you have some type of influence even if it is of only yourself.

[GrumpyParticipant]

The only thing I can be a King of is myself. Quite frankly I do not need, nor desire a Queen in any aspect of my life. A f~~~ now and then does not warrant the title of Queen.

Poke wrote:

the man has to handle all other issues surrounding his home, community, state, and nation of which he is capable of doing objectively and without emotion

I got a t-shirt, scars inside and out, and several medals attesting that I have already fulfilled my rights, duties, and obligations regarding handling that, none of which were granted for just being in the area. So I refuse to stand in the front line again while manginas, white knights, and women reap the rewards.

Poke wrote:

We have to fight the institutions that have mangina, blue pill men governing them.

Right… off you go then. I’d rather learn to play the piano

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

The only king & queen that I know …. that works well … is the seat on a motorcycle.

You can’t live with or marry The Borg.

Just as with ‘love’ ….. in this day and age …. it’s fairytale bunkum.

[GrumpyParticipant]

LOL

taking a knee on this one

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

sidecar wrote:

Trust me, it’s a lot more fun going off to be a bandit in the hills.

I’d rather be a Ronin.

Live by the sword and not have to answer to no one, especially trollops.

[Gen.OivanParticipant 88]

Keymaster wrote:

Observe the way women say things like “I want a man who knows how to treat me like a queen”. We’ve all hear that. A thousand times. It’s practically saturated in a woman’s psyche – expecting to be: “treated like a queen”. But she’s not actually looking for a “king” to respect, admire and look up to. She is expecting a man to be her subject. She is looking to be worshipped like a queen as if a man were a commoner. Where it gets problematic for her…. is when she is forced to realize that only a KING decides who will be queen. She does not. And, whenever a KING was displeased, it was “off with her head”. Suddenly, exactly the same woman will have a very big problem with being “treated like a queen”. A King doesn’t bow down or consider his queen object of worship. Point this out to a woman and she starts to get very nervous. It’s one of those “be careful what you wish for” moments. You may eventually get it. Consider the game of Chess. Most people think it’s came of regal strategy and nobility. But it’s just >>> MARRIAGE. The queen can move in any direction across the board as far as she wants, toppling any player in her path. The King can only move one…… small…… square at a time. Virtually powerless. “I want to be treated like a Queen!!”. “Great! I will be the King. Now if you fail to please me, your head will roll. How’s that sound?” She will never wish for it again.

 

Yes and the reason women believe they want to be treated as queens is because of media and movies, they believe the lie of Disney and every other movie studio where the king is some bumbling fool and the queen is the one running the kingdom. The sad part is people cram this s~~~ in their brains as if it was the undeniable truth and how kingdom’s were actually run. There is a reason it is called a “Kingdom” and not a “Queendom”.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Gen.Oivan wrote:

Yes and the reason women believe they want to be treated as queens is because of media and movies, they believe the lie of Disney

This Disney brainwashing became apparent to me when I saw Disney’s “Aladdin” in the early 90s. (Jasmine is a total bitch, by the way). I thought it was strange when Aladdin was gushing at the mere SIGHT of her in the marketplace…. and he was suffering from a sort of “approach anxiety”. Tripping over himself and his own words unable to put a coherent sentence together.

And then of course feeling a need to acquire his “prince” status to win the female. It was the first time I saw a Disney film through Red-Pill glasses and I was actually p~~~ed off through the movie. I actually made direct/mental parallels to women in my personal life to cartoon princesses. They really were identical in attitude, expected men to worship them and crawl through s~~~ for her affections, take her on a magic carpet ride to entertain her – all while behaving like a spoilt bitch.

After that movie, the whole prince / princess / king / queen totally made sense.
AND it came at a time when I noticed a marked change in female attitudes and behavior.

Disney is EXTREMELY clever in their subtle imagery. If you’re not careful you can let it seep into your psyche. It’s simply not natural for a man to fall apart in the presence of a female the way Aladdin did. But little boys see that s~~~ and actually BELIEVE a “pretty girl” should make them nervous.

There are so many TV shows and movies where a guy sees an attractive girl and he needs “support”:
“UH gosh…. what do I SAY to her?”….. and “whoa dude you totally crashed and burned , man!!!!”

No he didn’t “crash and burn”. She just said “no I don’t want to dance with you”.
Hardly “crashing and burning”. They allow female rejection to equal “crashing and burning”.

The worst part is how it over-inflates female value to outrageous proportions.
Disney is why a fat and frumpy 6 from Idaho thinks she’s an LA 10.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 14]

Do you guys know why the most powerful piece in Chess is the Queen?

Let me tell you the real story then. It isn’t. In fact there never was a piece called Queen in Chess because Queens were went to the battlefield.

You see Chess originated in India around 6th century AD. That ancient form of Indian chess still exists and its hard as hell. In that original form of Chess the piece that stood beside a King was called Mantri or the Minister. Then the game spread to the Middle East and eventually Europe and there some genius mistranslated Mantri the Indian word for Minister to Maharani the Indian term for Queen. And the rest is history.

I have seen so many feminist quote that women are meant to be powerful because of in Chess, the Quess is the most powerful and Chess is a game of intellectuals and the most accurate representation of life, in a game. Just each and every one of their ludicrous theories this too is based on a gross misapprehension.

[experiencedParticipant]

ILiveAgain said, “You can’t live with or marry The Borg”

 

NABALT:

  ow

 

 Ernest Borg? Nein.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Author]

Posts