Home › Forums › Political Corner › How can Trump ban violent videogames to save lives?
This topic contains 25 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by 
IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) 1 year, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Trump came to drain the swamp, and to fix things. He said he is the only one could. He has put out the call to stop violence in videogames, in order to save lives:
Video game violence & glorification must be stopped—it is creating monsters!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 17, 2012
So, how can Trump go about banning violent videogame so no other kids have to die? I am seeing it to be very difficult, because the videogame lobby won’t allow for it, nor will videogame retailers. There is too much at state. With Net Neutrality being done away with, with the FCC, and data on the Net being treated differently, couldn’t the government then impose a punishing tax on any videogames that are violent to make them so expensive, so that they aren’t affordable? You could then also use this money to pay for the guns to arm school teachers and pay them to be competent enough to do headshots against attackers who come into classrooms.
So, how can Trump ban violent videogames to save lives?
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
He can’t.
"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K
Look at the date of the post. December 17, 2012. In addition, the context surrounding the statement is not given.
With Net Neutrality being done away with, with the FCC, and data on the Net being treated differently,
Whoa, let’s get something straight here. “Net Neutrality” was the Obama administration plan TO CENSOR the internet. By throwing out “Net Neutrality” the Trump Administration has taken a step towards preventing censorship.
You could then also use this money to pay for the guns to arm school teachers and pay them to be competent enough to do headshots against attackers who come into classrooms.
A few days ago, President Trump suggested paying teachers to carry weapons: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-22/trump-proposes-bonus-teachers-who-carry-guns
Look at the date of the post. December 17, 2012. In addition, the context surrounding the statement is not given.
With Net Neutrality being done away with, with the FCC, and data on the Net being treated differently,
Whoa, let’s get something straight here. “Net Neutrality” was the Obama administration plan TO CENSOR the internet. By throwing out “Net Neutrality” the Trump Administration has taken a step towards preventing censorship.
You could then also use this money to pay for the guns to arm school teachers and pay them to be competent enough to do headshots against attackers who come into classrooms.
A few days ago, President Trump suggested paying teachers to carry weapons: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-22/trump-proposes-bonus-teachers-who-carry-guns
Where you getting the money to pay them to do this? School districts are strapped for cash, as is. You want to used tax credits to do so, that the government gets even less tax revenue, or pass money around somewhere else?
Trump suggests. Trump suggests a lot of things. Issues is one of what can be done. Trump said that violent videogames make monsters, so the issue is violent videogames.
Again, with my proposal, where you end up being able to treat data differently, you can tax the data of violent videogames to pay for the guns for teacher. Net neutrality requires all data being treated the same, which prevents ability to favor certain data, or charge more for it. Net neutrality says that internet providers treat data the way electric companies treat electricity.
So, where is the money coming from to pay to arm teachers, or pay them more? Are there any specific details, or is it is just a bunch of pointless pandering that sounds nice, and doesn’t come to pass?
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
Anonymous7School districts are strapped for cas
Public schools are a joke and a money pit.
I have worked on software for schools, believe me, most teachers (not all, most) do not spend mental resources on how to educate. They worry more about the Union, Union contract and how to turn defective girls (boys) into girls.You hate Trump, ok.
{edit: using the economics of public schools was a poor choice. You should endeavor todo better in your s~~~ tests}Where you getting the money to pay them to do this? School districts are strapped for cash, as is.
No, school districts get plenty of money. The problem is the school administrators squander the money they get on political correct policies and other actions.
Trump said that violent videogames make monsters, so the issue is violent videogames.
That statement was made over five years ago. I rank this at the same level as the “grab by the pussy” accusation. The statement is taken out of context.
Again, with my proposal, where you end up being able to treat data differently, you can tax the data of violent videogames to pay for the guns for teacher.
How about instead we tax the advertising money used to pay for soap operas and day time talk shows, which feminist SJWs love, to pay for this.
Since the corporations pander to the SJW crowds, the SJWs need to be taxed on the products they like.
Net neutrality requires all data being treated the same,
That is the claim, but the fine details, and whom was behind “Net Neutrality” say otherwise.
So, where is the money coming from to pay to arm teachers, or pay them more?
I answered your question.
Are there any specific details, or is it is just a bunch of pointless pandering that sounds nice, and doesn’t come to pass?
That is pretty much what the democrats excel at. Pandering and demonizing, but do not take any actions to help the people they pander to. You notice that DACA has been completely dropped by the democrats. In a few weeks, gun control will be dropped for something else.
Anonymous54When we were kids, some wanted to ban the Three Stooges, cause they would make us violent.
Its all Moe Howards fault! Hahah
Enviourment makes kids violent. How many virtual enemies some 8 y/o black boy from a ghetto had killed before made his first victim on the streets? I doubt he even plays much in video games. So Mr. Trump wrote non-sense. Tell him I need him to discuss it! 🙂
Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)
Anonymous7When we were kids, some wanted to ban the Three Stooges, cause they would make us violent.
F~~~ing Genius.
How about instead we tax the advertising money used to pay for soap operas and day time talk shows, which feminist SJWs love, to pay for this.
Since the corporations pander to the SJW crowds, the SJWs need to be taxed on the products they like.☆☆☆☆
Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s who’d turn their guns against a male student because ” I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to get violent and put my life in danger” Domestic-Violence type of arguments that would get them a pussy pass and allow them to gun down boys!
One solution is Access Control. Reduce school entrances to ONE entry double door and ONE exit door.
Post a couple military armed veterans there. Put them to work, I’m sure they’d love to be of service again.Plus, make students carry their books without backpacks or see-through backpacks.
Also, students with mental illness should not go to school but be taught at home by a tutor until it is safe to let the student return to school approved by a psychologist.
Finally, a mandatory students/teachers/parents conference should be organised every Friday where ALL issues of bullying would be addressed in the open with the bullies being called out and the victims of bullying heard.
If this problem is to be correctly tackled and surmounted then a LOT needs to change.
Americans need to recognize that their very way of life is directly contributing to the problem.
Blame and pretty words won’t do, never have, never will.Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!
Anonymous54I lived for Saturday mornings!!!
Every Generation blames violence on some form of pop culture.Mental Illness will allways exist.
Sports are a healthy outlet for Young Mens aggression.
Being taught how to stand up to bullies.
How to endure Defeat.
Thats what Dads and healthy Male role models are for.
Anonymous7Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s
I cannot disagree. Arming teachers would be a good idea except for the teacher part.
How about arming non teacher staff. The janitors come to mind.
BTW I’m not dissin janitors, I was one.
Anonymous54Good Idea with the Janitors.
For all the kiddie puke they have to clean up, allow them some Manly Status and purpose.Libtard females and guns?
Not a good idea…..Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s who’d turn their guns against a male student because ” I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to get violent and put my life in danger” Domestic-Violence type of arguments that would get them a pussy pass and allow them to gun down boys!
That is the genius of the plan. Eventually, boys will refuse to go to school on the grounds they fear for their lives from the “teachers” and civilization breaks.
Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s who’d turn their guns against a male student because ” I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to get violent and put my life in danger” Domestic-Violence type of arguments that would get them a pussy pass and allow them to gun down boys!
It’s simple: just arm the male teachers. Unfortunately, that’s just too sensible to fly.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
They can take, “God of War” from my cold dead hands. I like my video games bloody.
Back off Barbie!
Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s who’d turn their guns against a male student because ” I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to get violent and put my life in danger” Domestic-Violence type of arguments that would get them a pussy pass and allow them to gun down boys!
It’s simple: just arm the male teachers. Unfortunately, that’s just too sensible to fly.
What male teachers? ALL two of ’em?
Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!Arming teachers is a mistake in my opinion. We know that most of those teachers are weemins, useless t~~~s who’d turn their guns against a male student because ” I was in fear for my life, I thought he was going to get violent and put my life in danger” Domestic-Violence type of arguments that would get them a pussy pass and allow them to gun down boys!
That is the genius of the plan. Eventually, boys will refuse to go to school on the grounds they fear for their lives from the “teachers” and civilization breaks.
Civilization is already broken.
Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!(I Go My Own Way) wrote:
Where you getting the money to pay them to do this? School districts are strapped for cash, as is.Lets get the community involved. The cheerleaders can hold a car wash. We could conscript an army of little girls to sling cookies door to door. Moms could hold a bake sale. Perhaps the local sports teams could wear a certain color or maybe a ribbon of some sort, as an awareness booster and we could ask for donations at half time. A red bucket outside businesses could help.
And what about our local businesses, the car dealership and grocery store chain are usually good for a few charity donations to the local high school. Maybe people could start taking a knee at some event somewhere to bring attention to the cause. Public service announcements with cute kids asking….do you want me to die……Jimmy Kimmel could his bit.
I think if we all pulled together we could get this gun buying program funded. Look what we did for breast cancer.
How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.
The supreme court might take some issue with that.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
