Hillary Plays The Woman Card.

[HitmanParticipant]

So..how many times did Hillary play the woman card tonight?
Damn, I couldn’t get to see the entire debate but during the first half she was pushing the woman issue so f~~~ing hard it started to actually hurt.
She is a “nasty woman “..
I’m so glad Trump said that to her. .
Thoughts. ?

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Notice who plays the woman and race card over and over and over and over and over…

Kinda funny democrats accuse republicans of being racist/sexist so much when its the democrats who so consistently race bait and play the woman card for votes.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I thought it was particularly poignant for her to express her concern about kids, cry about toddlers and guns and then 30 seconds later reaffirm her support for murdering the unborn. Yeah that makes sense.

[HitmanParticipant]

Damn good point there Pete. .
Likewise to you to beer..

[HitmanParticipant]

Spot on redpillbible!

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Hillary luades the Roe Wade decision and I can assure you it is one of the goofiest decisions ever penned. Don’t bother to go read the whole thing since just about every justice wrote an opinion and its long winded—-I’ll give you the short and sweet on it.

Our Supremes “found” the right to have an abortion by (and I’m not making this up REALLY) “detecting emanations from a penumbra of rights…” What the hell does that mean? I was an attorney and I don’t have any idea—no one does.

Nor did I EVER understand how Griswald V Conn was precedent for Roe. Griswald involved a guy being denied access to rubbers under Conn law–which was overruled by the Supremes based upon his newly discovered right of privacy. FINE But that case was about access to contraception—abortion DOES NOT—why because contraception HAS ALREADY OCCURRED! So logically how does a case about contraception morph into precedent for a case about destroying what was conceived?

I made this argument 30 years ago in law school and was shouted down…laughed at but no one ever made a logical cogent argument about my logic.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

PistolPete wrote:

Hillary luades the Roe Wade decision and I can assure you it is one of the goofiest decisions ever penned. Don’t bother to go read the whole thing since just about every justice wrote an opinion and its long winded—-I’ll give you the short and sweet on it.

Our Supremes “found” the right to have an abortion by (and I’m not making this up REALLY) “detecting emanations from a penumbra of rights…” What the hell does that mean? I was an attorney and I don’t have any idea—no one does.

Nor did I EVER understand how Griswald V Conn was precedent for Roe. Griswald involved a guy being denied access to rubbers under Conn law–which was overruled by the Supremes based upon his newly discovered right of privacy. FINE But that case was about access to contraception—abortion DOES NOT—why because contraception HAS ALREADY OCCURRED! So logically how does a case about contraception morph into precedent for a case about destroying what was conceived?

I made this argument 30 years ago in law school and was shouted down…laughed at but no one ever made a logical cogent argument about my logic.

sounds like they’re saying abortion is a form of contraception, but I would say it isn’t. Contraception is to prevent conception, as you said. The pregnancy has already happened by the time the abortion roles around.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Exactly my point—you get it because you are thinking logically and rationally. To them abortion is a form of contraception which is illogical since the presence of the baby means conception HAS occurred. OH I CAN STILL HEAR EVERYONE IN THE HALL LAUGHING ME OUT OF THE PLACE. It was terrible.

[HitmanParticipant]

I ain’t laughing at you brother.
Great info!

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Hitman wrote:

I ain’t laughing at you brother

Thanks man–after all these years that really does mean a lot to me.

[HitmanParticipant]

Well Pete, thanks. .those douche bags that laughed instead of using logic were wrong!

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Both looked tired, serious and upset. Like maybe they were exchanging words prior to the debate.

Both did fine, but damn that woman was using every “think of the children” phrase in the book. It actually got as bad as “Fact check” in the second debate. Like seriously get over it already, we get you are trying to use subliminal messaging. Misdirected on the Clinton Foundation as well was pretty bad.

Trump also let the dude give way more time to her over him. He kept f~~~ing interrupting his allotted time. He also didn’t pounce.

I’d say no clear winner.

[BeeParticipant 700]

A man with Hillary’s exact same circumstances wouldn’t stand a chance. Hillary is going to win because she is a woman. The media love it. They already have their 10 minute video montages edited about this historic event. Nixon had to resign over 7 minutes of audio tape.

[TuneoutParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Exactly my point—you get it because you are thinking logically and rationally. To them abortion is a form of contraception which is illogical since the presence of the baby means conception HAS occurred. OH I CAN STILL HEAR EVERYONE IN THE HALL LAUGHING ME OUT OF THE PLACE. It was terrible.

I’ll bet it was more nervous laughter-like trying to bring up Mem’s issues in a gender studies class-
because no one has the b~~~~ to handle that hot potato,
esp Gov’ts and the courts.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9550]

With all the problems going on in the world and she brings up toddlers and children with guns as if that’s a big national problem that needs solving. I need a job, and a way of living my life without so many barriers; the last thing I care about is toddlers handling guns as a way to abolish the 2nd Amendment. Here’s the solution; parents be responsible and put your gun somewhere you’re kid can’t get to. Just that simple!

Seriously I’m sick of hearing about woman and kids in this election cycle as if that’s the only group of people that matter.

By the way Hillary, you’re a nasty woman.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[LurchParticipant 3866]

PistolPete wrote:

cry about toddlers and guns

Any parent irresponsible enough to have loaded firearms lying around, in reach of toddlers, seriously shouldn’t have children in the first place.

Hillary is just using “Think of the children!” bulls~~~, to give herself license to take our guns, disarm the population so we can’t fight back when the UN arrives to “re-educate” the US population into mindless drones.

It’s 1984 meets the Nazi regime!

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

Here’s the solution; parents be responsible and put your gun somewhere you’re kid can’t get to. Just that simple!

Its what scares me about the democrat’s platform…so much of it should just be common sense that it shouldn’t be an issue. For example, rather than implement a bunch of new gun laws of which the criminals and the stupid are not going to abide by anyhow, why not have fewer gun laws with harsher punishments? Punish the stupid and the criminals, the ones who are causing the problems, not all of us. But as we all know, democrats don’t believe in the idea that YOU f~~~ed up, now YOU pay the consequences, they’d rather we all sink together in the name of “equality.”

[Anonymous 0]

She played every card she could when she realized she was not doing too hot. How illogical can some one be? Toddlers and guns killing tens of thousands a year? Get bent Hitlery you emotional fear mongering c~~~.

[Author]

Posts