Hillary Clinton's Reason For Losing The Election Is Now At 24!!

[Anonymous 6]

Good ol’ Hillary still in the news. She is still lost at the thought that this New York Billionaire came in as a rookie, and beat her at the game that was rigged for her to win. She had everything in her favor, except where it counted, The American People.

She had Obama, Michelle, the Media, The DNC, and $2 Billion dollars at her disposal and still could not get the job done. When historians look back at this election they will see that she truly had no real chance of winning the election. It was a change election, and she was the status quo candidate. People were tired of business as usual and Trump tapped into that anger.

This country has been moving to the right since 2012. Don’t believe me, look at the election maps from 2008 to 2016. I’ll do it for you.

Here is 2008, you’ll see that Obama soundly beat McCain and the Democrats controlled the House and the Senate.

Here is 2010, you’ll notice that this is a House Congressional map. This map is turning red slightly and this is the same year that Obamacare was signed.

Here is 2012, Romney lost an election that he should have won. You’ll notice that Obama lost some states that he has previously won. And, Obama was the first President to get LESS votes in his re-election, than he got in his 1st election. So getting less votes, losing the House and Senate, you can safely assume that even after just four years, people were already tired of him.

Here is 2014, you will see that the Republicans have soundly taken over the Senate and now hold firm control.

Here is 2016, you’ll see that this map is an almost mirror opposite of what happened eight years prior. The Democrats were soundly defeated and the country rejected the policies of Obama. If that were not so, Hillary would be our President now, But she’s NOT!!

Hillary lost this election fair and square and cannot handle it, and neither can the liberal supporters. Man, I wish I could have been a fly on the wall in the White House on election night. I bet that was a sight to see.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

How about no one trusts her.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 43]

vast right wing conspiracy

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22555]

Anonymous wrote:

vast right wing conspiracy

Remember, she was the one whom coined that term.

[joetechParticipant]

The presumption that she was going to win was ‘fake news’. Let’s add fake news to the list.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[Anonymous 6]

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9558]

Yeah, it’s everyone’s fault but hers, because she thinks it was her turn. Another sense of entitlement and playing the victim.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Aside from the fact that she was a criminal and a venomous shrew, I’ll tell you why she lost.

1) She assumed she would win.
2) The media assumed she would win and said so constantly.
3) Instead of ignoring Trump as a rational opponent would have, they missed no opportunity to make fun of him, keeping his name in the news every single day.

But most importantly:

4) They made voting for Trump “politically incorrect”, driving support for Trump underground so that it could not be readily measured and making it appear to all posters and pundits that Hillary had it in the bag.

The proper campaign for Hillary Clinton would have been:

1) Keep her voice off the airwaves and never mention the fact that she is a female or that she deserves the job.
2) Ignore Trump completely and only speak to him when spoken to directly by him (a sign of politeness).
3) Talk in broad, sweeping terms about what a New Clinton administration would look like, appropriating the “get to work” language of the near Right wherever possible.

Will Democrats learn their lesson from this? No, because they believe they can and should FIX PEOPLE and make them do the right things for the right reasons and so they have to get out there and demonize the opposition and make people feel BAD for supporting them.

Basket of deplorables, indeed. She’d have won more votes if she’d have called Trump supporters a bucket of turds, just because it sounds more honest. But no, humans are perfectible and the socialists “know” how to perfect us so they’ve got to make us get on board of our own volition, even if it kills us. Even if it kills them.

There’s political ideology for you. As close to religion as you can’t see any sunlight between them.

[Back in BlackParticipant 1732]

Also her asinine slogan “love trumps hate”. Who in their right mind would put their opponents NAME in their slogan. HA HA HA. Too funny. Love to see when an entitled c~~~ legitimately gets her comeuppance.

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.” Quote from Arthur Shopenhauer, 17th century philosopher

[Author]

Posts